44
posted ago by BRIMTHELAD ago by BRIMTHELAD +44 / -0

" In his opinion on the case, Murray wrote that "individual constitutional rights are not absolute and are subject to a balancing with the countervailing state interest," concluding that "issuing injunctive relief would not serve the public interest."[9]"

https://ballotpedia.org/Christopher_Murray

Am I wrong, or does the decision this judge made go against the actual constitutional writing? Michigan needs to know this judge is also up for re-election come Nov. 2020

Comments (5)
sorted by:
7
CovfefeNegro 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is one of 'our' greater problems...the courts in various places are corrupt, yes.

At some point either the Feds or We the People have to act, not just sue and vote but act.

https://kekpe.pe/i/5eab05783bd8a.png

4
BRIMTHELAD [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hoping Mr. Barr sticks to the warning he gave and takes them out.

5
Butthurt 5 points ago +5 / -0

“No right is absolute” it’s just another way of saying “you will never be free”

3
Count_Dyscalculia 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no..."Unless" in the Constitution.

1
TrumpSteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Appeal. He will get fucking crushed higher up.