" In his opinion on the case, Murray wrote that "individual constitutional rights are not absolute and are subject to a balancing with the countervailing state interest," concluding that "issuing injunctive relief would not serve the public interest."[9]"
https://ballotpedia.org/Christopher_Murray
Am I wrong, or does the decision this judge made go against the actual constitutional writing? Michigan needs to know this judge is also up for re-election come Nov. 2020
“No right is absolute” it’s just another way of saying “you will never be free”