230
Comments (13)
sorted by:
15
SpaceRussian 15 points ago +15 / -0

Given he also believes in population control. I really don’t think we want his vaccines.

5
K-Harbour 5 points ago +5 / -0
  1. Has anyone considered the risk of a worldwide deployment of a new vaccine that has undiscovered side effects?

Such as:

  1. generation skipping infertility?
  2. morbidity of certain races or bloodlines?
  3. deimmunization from some other disease?

Our current FDA and public health community do not yet have expertise or competency to identify or address these risks.

4
K-Harbour 4 points ago +4 / -0

PS — as a matter of global health policy, all new drugs should be automatically banned from universal deployment.

5
Pres_Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Snopes Fact Check "This is kind of false. Bill Gates himself did not literally paralyze half a million children by his bare hands."

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
1
chambleepede 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agreed... at best, I think it is a murky mix of "unclear."

1
powershellder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Natural News usually links to the actual studies though.

Read the sources and evaluate; don’t be like the liberals who ignore things just because they come from Fox News.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Nationalist2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like the answer to all questions, "it depends".

If you're a globalist the answer is a resounding YES.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-9
dabicsta -9 points ago +2 / -11

Vaccines are good. Don't be stupid.

4
Pepega 4 points ago +5 / -1

vaccines when used for deceases that are actually terrible and have tons of studies and testing done to adequately prove they are safe for mass consumption are good...

So most are not haha

2
FudgyFudgeBots 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell that to the children who developed intessuception after getting a rotavirus vaccine ...you know...the one that was pulled from the market.