I am going to give her a pass for having sex with the underage boy for now. Rose challenged Democrat power with her struggle with Weinstein assaulting her.
It is so sad when women who feel violated... and have a judge rule that yes they were violated get put through the ringer like this.
By Democrat rules she is untouchable. But she challenges their power and just look at the way they treat her. Look at who does NOT come to her defense.
Rose and I will never play golf together or see eye to eye on much. But it is hard to watch "her people" burn her for being consistent with her #metoo beliefs. Yes I know about the underage guy she slept with.
It is tough to see somebody live their life by a very lose sense of "principles" only to be betrayed so publicly. Look at how savage they attack her vs say Candice Owens.
For the record I would put Candice on a pedestal way above rose... but wow what did Rose do to deserve such a savage and public beating?
Candice is all class and gets attacked for her beliefs. Rose is... skanky at best but man look at how she is attacked. Rose is ideologically on the same page with her attackers on every issue other than the sexual assault of women.
It is amazing to me how a person like Candice who shares none of the beliefs of her attackers is treated compared to Rose. Rose is a democrat socialist getting roasted harder than a born free American free woman.
The attacks on Rose tell us what is more threatening. The answer shocks me.
I am confused I thought Candice had a lot of support from Trump supporters? I know the left hates her but she also has lots of fans. Rose is totally isolated on both spectrum's now.
You nailed it. Candice should get stronger attacks because she opposes everything the left stands for.
Rose is totally isolated and is a victim with a judges order proving it. Look at the way these lefties attack the ideologically aligned but far more vulnerable Rose.
Only weak pussies would gang up on a rape victim. This isn't about ideology it is about isolating victims they can destroy.
That weak idiot who is commenting on McGowans post is a gullible fool. The accusations were in the 90's. Larry King episode in the 90's. The neighbors communication with Reade in the 90's. Her dads book, which she supposedly copied came out in 2010. He's a dimwit. 😂
I agree with the spirit of your response, but corroborate is the wrong word.
Her dad's book, her mom's call in to CNN and her original accusation all have the same source: her. Just like the Yahoo article about the Steele dossier did not corroborate the contents of the dossier because Steele was Yahoo's source as well. You need a second source to corroborate in this context.
"Validates" is what you are looking for, I think. Since it shows her story never changed, it lends a bit more credence. Even that seems too strong of a word
i read the actual paragraph from the dad's novel, it doesn't sound like anything connected to the daughter's incident. It just sounds like a generic raunchy love sequence, like the most common type of romance scene. "He shoves her against the wall, opened her legs." If i were to be asked to come up with a generic spicy sex sequence, that would be it.
Easy manipulated ? Hahahahahahaha says the soy boy who's probably wearing a mask, jerks off to pornhub and thinks there are more than 2 genders.. fucking sheep. And I am the sheep dog, I am free thinker like most MAGA folks . Am I right.
Our movement may not be perfect, trump has flaws, but we don't pretend that we're perfect. These people think that the world is black or white; good vs. evil they can't think outside of the box because if they leave the box they will be treated like Rose here.
she seems like a tortured soul and i dont say that lightly
Right, she's a legit victim, not like 90% of those frauds that tried to use the movement for fame and politics. You can see it in her eyes.
I am going to give her a pass for having sex with the underage boy for now. Rose challenged Democrat power with her struggle with Weinstein assaulting her.
It is so sad when women who feel violated... and have a judge rule that yes they were violated get put through the ringer like this.
By Democrat rules she is untouchable. But she challenges their power and just look at the way they treat her. Look at who does NOT come to her defense.
It is both shocking and telling.
You are right and I am wrong:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/27/arts/rose-mcgowan-asia-argento-jimmy-bennett.html
I appreciate the correction. I will have to google celebrity gossip before I post as I don't follow those losers closely.
The chick who had sex with the underage boy was the other founder of MeToo
This fiend is telling her that she has 2 choices, who does that? An abusive man who beats women, that's who.
I can't help but think the majority of people amplifying the Biden defense are all Russian and Chinese.
I'm starting to think that too
They don't realize Americans eventually will recognize bullshit and their propaganda techniques won't work forever here
Rose and I will never play golf together or see eye to eye on much. But it is hard to watch "her people" burn her for being consistent with her #metoo beliefs. Yes I know about the underage guy she slept with.
It is tough to see somebody live their life by a very lose sense of "principles" only to be betrayed so publicly. Look at how savage they attack her vs say Candice Owens.
For the record I would put Candice on a pedestal way above rose... but wow what did Rose do to deserve such a savage and public beating?
What happened with Candice? Because she's a Trump supporter?
Candice is all class and gets attacked for her beliefs. Rose is... skanky at best but man look at how she is attacked. Rose is ideologically on the same page with her attackers on every issue other than the sexual assault of women.
It is amazing to me how a person like Candice who shares none of the beliefs of her attackers is treated compared to Rose. Rose is a democrat socialist getting roasted harder than a born free American free woman.
The attacks on Rose tell us what is more threatening. The answer shocks me.
I am confused I thought Candice had a lot of support from Trump supporters? I know the left hates her but she also has lots of fans. Rose is totally isolated on both spectrum's now.
You nailed it. Candice should get stronger attacks because she opposes everything the left stands for.
Rose is totally isolated and is a victim with a judges order proving it. Look at the way these lefties attack the ideologically aligned but far more vulnerable Rose.
Only weak pussies would gang up on a rape victim. This isn't about ideology it is about isolating victims they can destroy.
It is as shocking as it is depraved.
Having faced persecution ans isolation for speaking out in Utah church - FOR THINGS EVERYBODY KNOWS AND AGREES ON -
I respect Rose for what she faces. They aren't just threats. I think she is redpilling and waking up.
It took time for all of us.
That weak idiot who is commenting on McGowans post is a gullible fool. The accusations were in the 90's. Larry King episode in the 90's. The neighbors communication with Reade in the 90's. Her dads book, which she supposedly copied came out in 2010. He's a dimwit. 😂
her dad's book corroborates here story further, or am i misssing something here. Here dad would have been inspired by her
I agree with the spirit of your response, but corroborate is the wrong word.
Her dad's book, her mom's call in to CNN and her original accusation all have the same source: her. Just like the Yahoo article about the Steele dossier did not corroborate the contents of the dossier because Steele was Yahoo's source as well. You need a second source to corroborate in this context.
"Validates" is what you are looking for, I think. Since it shows her story never changed, it lends a bit more credence. Even that seems too strong of a word
I'm tired and rambling. Carry on.
i read the actual paragraph from the dad's novel, it doesn't sound like anything connected to the daughter's incident. It just sounds like a generic raunchy love sequence, like the most common type of romance scene. "He shoves her against the wall, opened her legs." If i were to be asked to come up with a generic spicy sex sequence, that would be it.
The guy was trying to say she got her story from the book when the book didn't come out until years after she reported the assault.
Easy manipulated ? Hahahahahahaha says the soy boy who's probably wearing a mask, jerks off to pornhub and thinks there are more than 2 genders.. fucking sheep. And I am the sheep dog, I am free thinker like most MAGA folks . Am I right.
Our movement may not be perfect, trump has flaws, but we don't pretend that we're perfect. These people think that the world is black or white; good vs. evil they can't think outside of the box because if they leave the box they will be treated like Rose here.
sean is a huge shill/troll. Do not bother. He thinks because reade's father wrote a fictional love scene in a book, that all sex assault is fake.
what's this page 37 thing
Sounds like “Sean” is a material witness, since he is so sure about the incident.
I bet Sean's got a real big brain. Super high IQ on that one.
Would classify him as a potential material witness who needs to be deposed.
What is this crap “page 37 of her dad’s book”?
You don't even need to roll through Sean's history to know he had at least a dozen tweets backing the Kavanaugh hoax.
Who the fuck is Sean and why should Rose care what he thinks?
Rose McGowan needs to respond to some unverified nutcake on Twitter.
ANSWER ME YOU WHORE. HOW DARE YOU IGNORE ME I HAVE A BEARD.
Anyways I mean Rose is fucking nuts too but people in Twitter are fucking hilariously oversure of their own importance.
Dumb and dumber