3196
Comments (263)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
145
SquiggyMcPepe 145 points ago +145 / -0

They banned it because they know once enough prominent people start saying to go back to work and ignore your dictator govs unlawful orders that its over and they can't have that. This virus is their last chance to destroy the country before the elections.

49
deleted 49 points ago +50 / -1
18
Evei 18 points ago +19 / -1

Then we need to start removing people first.

3
Data 3 points ago +4 / -1

Time to stack bodies.

2
luke21 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got shadow banned about a year and a half ago. I would start new accounts and see how long until they caught me and I got the chains. Was usually about a week. But sometimes they programmed the month for thirty days instead of 31. So I got my tweets seen and a couple of follows for a whole day. I finally left their tyranny for good. They really suck.

-43
SquiggyMcPepe -43 points ago +9 / -52

But the thing is she isn't being silenced. She has her own web site and plenty of reach through conservative media. The only thing twitter did by banning her is give her even more credibility.

48
nutup_orshutup 48 points ago +48 / -0

She absolutely is being silenced. Millions of twitizens won’t see a conservative black female because of this.

Just because she has other platforms does not mean she was not silenced on twitter and it must take away at least some of her reach.

And, twitter is fascist for doing this. If they can do this to her, imagine how many thousands or millions of us they are doing it to.

-14
SquiggyMcPepe -14 points ago +6 / -20

I'm not defending twitter I'm simply saying that at this point they are irrelevant. Candice has plenty of reach across multiple platforms. I mean if she is being silenced then why are we talking about it and sharing it? Twitter banning Candice only makes her stronger.

27
Farmerbob1 27 points ago +27 / -0

This is a dangerous stance to take. Accepting 'just a little' political censorship starts you down a very slippery slope.

4
SquiggyMcPepe 4 points ago +9 / -5

But who is accepting it? Right now its trending across the internet and are we not having a merry time discussing it? Her tweet is getting more exposure now than it ever would if twitter had simply left her alone? Think pedes, think!

21
kono_hito_wa 21 points ago +23 / -2

Separate but equal.

11
bigdickhangsright 11 points ago +11 / -0

Twitter throwing conservatives to the back of the bus -- nay! Twitter throwing conservatives off the fucking bus - yay!

-4
SquiggyMcPepe -4 points ago +7 / -11

Fuck off with your insinuation. She is getting more exposure now than if twitter hadn't banned her and you can bet she will be making the rounds of every major conservative show and be featured in countless online rags. Fuck twitter they are irrelevant at this point.

9
FAQ-REDDIT 9 points ago +9 / -0

Correction... banning GIVES credibility. Fuck twatter, they are ZERO authority on giving anything, except a place for free speech. If law enforcement / laws are not broken then they are in violation of the Constitution 1st amendment.

3
KuzoKevin [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

To us, banning gives credibility, but we are not the entirety of the electorate. Twitter has shut down an opinion that tells people to open businesses and go back to work. AOC, meanwhile, is telling people to go on strike. On Twitter, right now, only one voice is being heard.

1
SquiggyMcPepe 1 point ago +4 / -3

I agree. Right now her name is trending across the internet in spite of twitter banning her and that tweet is getting way more exposure as a result.

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
0
SquiggyMcPepe 0 points ago +5 / -5

We have a viable government and media. We just have to take it back from the moloch worshiping pedo's who infiltrated it.

17
tombombadil 17 points ago +17 / -0

Elon Musk should tweet out the exact same thing. Watch how they don’t ban him. Then he can accuse twitter of racism.

9
SquiggyMcPepe 9 points ago +10 / -1

I think she will be back shortly. She is getting a shit ton of exposure over it and twitter is getting far more negative feedback than positive.

3
tombombadil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Negative as in negative towards Twitter or negative towards her?

4
SquiggyMcPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Towards twitter. Not the blue checks of course they have no choice but to back twitter without hesitation but everyone else is piling on the comments sections of any online stuff covering it like crazy. Disqus and dissenter are also two very useful tools to gauge public awareness and reach. Also clarified my previous post.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
No_Fun_Allowed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, the left likely don't know or even care about the actual threat level of the virus, but they do know it is their current best chance to seize absolute power.

1
side_o_beef 1 point ago +1 / -0

In that case they fucked up by putting it out a year early. Did they think people would sit in their house for a whole year and wait?

3
SquiggyMcPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

The D's had no part in spreading the virus. That was all china trying to wreck the worlds economies before they themselves go under. They Will Pay. As to the D's that corrupt mayor of chicago said never let a crisis go to waste and the D's followed it to a T. They saw the opportunity to wreck the economy to hurt Trump and hopped on with both feet. They would have used any crisis to turn it around. Now is there general cooperation between the chicoms and much of our leadership? Yep and those fuckers will hang once its fully exposed.