2291 BREAKING: “Non-Essential” Business Wins Huge Court Case Against State After Refusing To Close Doors To Public (100percentfedup.com) posted 348 days ago by uvontheterrible 348 days ago by uvontheterrible +2291 / -0 83 comments share 83 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (83) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 30 ▼ – NotaRussian_Bot 30 points 348 days ago +31 / -1 No because it wasn't adjudicated; state dropped it because they were fags and wouldn't win anyway. permalink save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – Miserable_company 10 points 348 days ago +11 / -1 But surely it could still be referenced as precedent in a defense, even if it loses some potency from being out of state? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – Trumpican 5 points 348 days ago +5 / -0 There is no case law to put into record. The DA refused to press charges, most likely citing a lack of evidence, which can also mean a lack of actual crime. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 348 days ago +2 / -0
No because it wasn't adjudicated; state dropped it because they were fags and wouldn't win anyway.
But surely it could still be referenced as precedent in a defense, even if it loses some potency from being out of state?
There is no case law to put into record. The DA refused to press charges, most likely citing a lack of evidence, which can also mean a lack of actual crime.