2291 BREAKING: “Non-Essential” Business Wins Huge Court Case Against State After Refusing To Close Doors To Public (100percentfedup.com) posted 348 days ago by uvontheterrible 348 days ago by uvontheterrible +2291 / -0 83 comments share 83 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (83) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 57 ▼ – deleted 57 points 347 days ago +57 / -0 ▲ 30 ▼ – K-Harbour 30 points 347 days ago +32 / -2 This news article is grossly incorrect on a key point. And does not report on the most important point. The state merely refused to prosecute. They clearly reserved the right to prosecute later. The actual judgment is not reported. Did the court acquit? Or, did it allow the state to prosecute later? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 15 ▼ – inspir3dgenius 15 points 347 days ago +15 / -0 You can do that? What would be the point of prosecuting later? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 19 ▼ – Biostrike14 19 points 347 days ago +19 / -0 prosecute after the political pressure is looking elsewhere, to punish them for daring to think for themselves. permalink parent save report block reply
This news article is grossly incorrect on a key point.
And does not report on the most important point.
The state merely refused to prosecute. They clearly reserved the right to prosecute later.
The actual judgment is not reported. Did the court acquit? Or, did it allow the state to prosecute later?
You can do that? What would be the point of prosecuting later?
prosecute after the political pressure is looking elsewhere, to punish them for daring to think for themselves.