Strange. Even if you take away THIRTY PERCENT of "CoVID-19" deaths [Currently ~244k, like the CDC did from 60k-->40k], that's still nearly the same amount as where the "experts predicted" in the allotted time frame?
"(b) suppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely. Each policy has major challenges. We find that that optimal mitigation policies (combining home isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths by half. However, the resulting mitigated epidemic would still likely result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems"
What false reality are you folks living in?
No, it's not going to kill the world. But it's very near the state it was estimated it would be two and a half months ago.
Strange. Even if you take away THIRTY PERCENT of "CoVID-19" deaths [Currently ~244k, like the CDC did from 60k-->40k], that's still nearly the same amount as where the "experts predicted" in the allotted time frame?
"(b) suppression, which aims to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely. Each policy has major challenges. We find that that optimal mitigation policies (combining home isolation of suspect cases, home quarantine of those living in the same household as suspect cases, and social distancing of the elderly and others at most risk of severe disease) might reduce peak healthcare demand by 2/3 and deaths by half. However, the resulting mitigated epidemic would still likely result in hundreds of thousands of deaths and health systems"
What false reality are you folks living in?
No, it's not going to kill the world. But it's very near the state it was estimated it would be two and a half months ago.
They said millions of deaths...