Im real into the vocab shit. Decedent theory is based on recreating pre roman fall society, a main aspect is "subversion of linguistics." As much as I look at it I should really have an old dictionary but they actively change words on the internet. Im an anarchist so anarchy is one of my favs, anarchy- greek Archaim- having no rulers. Now they say anarchy is socialist. Like how? No rulers! Thats it! All key words like communism, socialism, shit like that they change. Like nimrod, kinda dumb but from religion, nimrod is a tyrant. Today because of greenday, its an idiot. Its good to look at because theyre straight altering truth with words
It depends what youre calling socialism. Of youre saying prehistoric tribal communities that were social structures, sure. If youre talking any type of modern socialism that requires government enforcement then no. And thats part of the liguistics deal, anarchism simply means zero rulers. Anarchism and socialism have the same desired outcome but implementation is entirely different. If they want to say they ascribe to a social structure like a tribal body thats one thing, but if thats socialism then nothing today called socialism is. And theres also modern usage and if that usage is beyond the generational boundaries, our entire generation has accepted that socialism is government powered, so I don't agree there. Id say that tribal social systems werent socialist, they were anarchist. In the tribe everyone is equal to an extent due to relation, in true socialism there is governmental force which is the master, and you cannot have masters and say youre anarchist
I dont need one. I understand socialism. Its how the weak level themselves against the strong. As far as what it is, the only thing modern socialism is, is government ownership of means of production. Thats it. Nothing else.
Well no, my intent is just personal but its mostly to see how they manipulate language to fit their agenda. Ownership of means of production is the most key aspect of socialism and creates its failures. Like hitler wanting to take industry from the jews was socialist. China owning industry to a large extent is why their citizens make 8k a year. Government owning industry creates the failure, its also socialisms main appeal, its how they garner support. Other aspects like social services or government handled utilities are an integral part of any form of government, theyre not socialist because they say so.
But yes that we have to somewhat try to go by the standard usage but its still good to know why effort was made to make it the standard usage.
Like how I say hitler wanting the jews industry. Hitler promised all kinds if socialist shit, its in the 25 point program for socialism. Promised government controlled industry, health care, education, banking etc. That got him support but over the years prior to ww2 it destroyed what economy they had left and created poverty. So his actions were the result of his socialist policy. In china they had the 5 pest program. The government took control of a form of industry and killed all the rats and mice then the sparrows. This caused a famine that killed millions. In the US we can see things like USPS getting destroyed by fedex, public schools weak vs private, public work projects losing, obamacare etc. From what I look at theae are the things that destroy socialist economies and its the common denominator. So to me, thats what socialism is despite things they add
bah!
There's nothing wrong with patriotism. It's just rooting for the home team.
Yeah its part of decedent theory, subversion of linguistics. Im more saying the group of idiots following the MSM without questioning
Im real into the vocab shit. Decedent theory is based on recreating pre roman fall society, a main aspect is "subversion of linguistics." As much as I look at it I should really have an old dictionary but they actively change words on the internet. Im an anarchist so anarchy is one of my favs, anarchy- greek Archaim- having no rulers. Now they say anarchy is socialist. Like how? No rulers! Thats it! All key words like communism, socialism, shit like that they change. Like nimrod, kinda dumb but from religion, nimrod is a tyrant. Today because of greenday, its an idiot. Its good to look at because theyre straight altering truth with words
It depends what youre calling socialism. Of youre saying prehistoric tribal communities that were social structures, sure. If youre talking any type of modern socialism that requires government enforcement then no. And thats part of the liguistics deal, anarchism simply means zero rulers. Anarchism and socialism have the same desired outcome but implementation is entirely different. If they want to say they ascribe to a social structure like a tribal body thats one thing, but if thats socialism then nothing today called socialism is. And theres also modern usage and if that usage is beyond the generational boundaries, our entire generation has accepted that socialism is government powered, so I don't agree there. Id say that tribal social systems werent socialist, they were anarchist. In the tribe everyone is equal to an extent due to relation, in true socialism there is governmental force which is the master, and you cannot have masters and say youre anarchist
I dont need one. I understand socialism. Its how the weak level themselves against the strong. As far as what it is, the only thing modern socialism is, is government ownership of means of production. Thats it. Nothing else.
Well no, my intent is just personal but its mostly to see how they manipulate language to fit their agenda. Ownership of means of production is the most key aspect of socialism and creates its failures. Like hitler wanting to take industry from the jews was socialist. China owning industry to a large extent is why their citizens make 8k a year. Government owning industry creates the failure, its also socialisms main appeal, its how they garner support. Other aspects like social services or government handled utilities are an integral part of any form of government, theyre not socialist because they say so.
But yes that we have to somewhat try to go by the standard usage but its still good to know why effort was made to make it the standard usage.
Like how I say hitler wanting the jews industry. Hitler promised all kinds if socialist shit, its in the 25 point program for socialism. Promised government controlled industry, health care, education, banking etc. That got him support but over the years prior to ww2 it destroyed what economy they had left and created poverty. So his actions were the result of his socialist policy. In china they had the 5 pest program. The government took control of a form of industry and killed all the rats and mice then the sparrows. This caused a famine that killed millions. In the US we can see things like USPS getting destroyed by fedex, public schools weak vs private, public work projects losing, obamacare etc. From what I look at theae are the things that destroy socialist economies and its the common denominator. So to me, thats what socialism is despite things they add
So like Barack Obama?
I was implying all the morons in ca telling me Im a terrorist over people in LA protesting when Im just sitting at home with my stupid mask on lol