Didn't listen, yet, but no, it wasn't a coup, it was a runawy Constitutional Convention...and they were honorable men. How do you think a Con-con would turn out with these scum bags?
Wtf pede? We all know historical men of renown were actually just human after all. Why the trolling? The author of this article is looking for the absolute worst and makes ZERO consideration for historicity. Shit’s weak and has nothing to do with GEOTUS.
Not trolling. Defending the position that this guy didn't bother to even watch and attacked. I'll link any article that differs from the norm. Sometimes history sucks. It's not all peaches and cream.
I get that, but the reasons listed in the article for Adams and Washington being “bad” are twisted and taken completely out of context. Washington was ambitious? WTF? Adams was wrestling for power as the first VP in our country’s history? If you dive into the deeper context of the “actual” history Adams was pissed as fuck, because he didn’t realize being the VP neutered him from having influence on the newest and greatest country in the world. He was the FIRST VP and was like “FUCK, I don’t get to help build this new awesome country in this position.” That’s why he tried so hard to have influence. The country was BRAND new, lots going on.
Cool story. To answer your question: I assume we turned out butchering our families in the Civil War, and relinquishing control of our Govt to the Deep State. *<--- you are here now
Federalists controlled the Post Offices and so controlled the mail... ?
Controlled the dissemination of information... federalists newspapers and correspondence gets distributed during the debates over ratification... anti-federalists' newspapers and correspondence gets "lost in the mail" = suppressed.
Book ordered. Thanks
Didn't listen, yet, but no, it wasn't a coup, it was a runawy Constitutional Convention...and they were honorable men. How do you think a Con-con would turn out with these scum bags?
https://allthatsinteresting.com/founding-fathers-bad "they were honorable men"
Wtf pede? We all know historical men of renown were actually just human after all. Why the trolling? The author of this article is looking for the absolute worst and makes ZERO consideration for historicity. Shit’s weak and has nothing to do with GEOTUS.
Not trolling. Defending the position that this guy didn't bother to even watch and attacked. I'll link any article that differs from the norm. Sometimes history sucks. It's not all peaches and cream.
I get that, but the reasons listed in the article for Adams and Washington being “bad” are twisted and taken completely out of context. Washington was ambitious? WTF? Adams was wrestling for power as the first VP in our country’s history? If you dive into the deeper context of the “actual” history Adams was pissed as fuck, because he didn’t realize being the VP neutered him from having influence on the newest and greatest country in the world. He was the FIRST VP and was like “FUCK, I don’t get to help build this new awesome country in this position.” That’s why he tried so hard to have influence. The country was BRAND new, lots going on.
Still, comparing them to the scum in office today, makes my point.
Cool story. To answer your question: I assume we turned out butchering our families in the Civil War, and relinquishing control of our Govt to the Deep State. *<--- you are here now
Federalists controlled the Post Offices and so controlled the mail... ?
Controlled the dissemination of information... federalists newspapers and correspondence gets distributed during the debates over ratification... anti-federalists' newspapers and correspondence gets "lost in the mail" = suppressed.
Book ordered. Thanks
Cool. You did the right thing. My job is done here.