2542
Comments (42)
sorted by:
62
r_u_srs_srsly 62 points ago +62 / -0

It's even dumber than that.

The request wasn't "throw them to the public unredacted"

Simply, locate them

The result is definitive,

  • the records exist,
  • they know exactly where they are,
  • they say exactly what we think they say.

So they're hiding behind the "you can't have that"

39
Keiichi81 39 points ago +39 / -0

No different than "You can't look through my Senatorial records, they contain information that might be compromising for my campaign," when all that was requested was that someone at UoD search the archived records for the keywords "Tara Reade" to see what specific relevant documents may exist. Not literally just release the entire archive to be publicly combed through.

Not to mention, would the excuse "You can't look through those records because the information in them might be damaging to my campaign" fly in any way were Trump to use it in dismissal of an investigation? Fuck, the entire Democrat party would collectively start salivating.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
6
AllTheWayTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fat will

1
TychoDurandal 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have the best Fat?

1
KS-76- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Corn pop

4
khp041000 4 points ago +4 / -0

They wanted to bitch about Trump's tax returns, but they won't release a simple, possibly exonerating search like this? Idiots. They deserve all the burning down of their house they're about to get.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
HrvyWnstnDdntKllHmsf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sandy fucking Berger, man. Stole and destroyed documents from the National Archive. Got away with a misdemeanour charge.

6
Brucesky420 6 points ago +6 / -0

We call that the "Find it and Shred it" move in my industry

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
10
leakmouth 10 points ago +10 / -0

@THEDONALD.WIN

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
3
steeldrivnman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Call Joe30330

2
zfcjr671 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look me over, will ya?

5
WU_HAN_FRU 5 points ago +5 / -0

NON COMPOS MENTIS

3
linereddit 3 points ago +4 / -1

...NOT the candidate.

7
linereddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not until the dnc believes the probability of President Trump's re-election makes their candidate's defeat too likely. If they grow confident of victory, Joe will be tossed over the rear transom quicker than you can say "bilge weight". Hillary or Big Mike will be the guest of honor at the coronation. Er, convention.

On the other hand, when the day arrives that they accept they are beaten, THEN the dnc will rally around Joe, supporting him as he leads them to defeat. Until then, the dnc will continue to damn him with faint praise while letting him get knifed by the media.

Pure speculation, of course.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
13
4cdarth 13 points ago +13 / -0

His team was sent to comb over ever page of the university stuff. The probably removed anything incriminating or making joe look bad before they decided they want to release it

6
IvIA6A 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep, going to let that narrative play out then steal documents like Sandy Berger

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
khp041000 2 points ago +2 / -0

I imagine we're going to find something on 4chan before too long.

9
TheUncouthTruth 9 points ago +9 / -0

The same people who are fine with this are the ones demanding to see Trump’s tax returns.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
HappyPedeInCA 5 points ago +6 / -1

The line that Biden was vetted by Obama’s campaign already And therefore the allegations are unfounded is unfortunately going to be pretty effective for persuasion standpoint. Despite the fact it makes no difference and the Obama campaign could have just looked the other way. No wonder they are all talking that line up in the news now.

3
HrvyWnstnDdntKllHmsf 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s actually the most compelling argument I’ve heard. Obama could have picked any random old white dude as ballast for his campaign, there was no reason to take any chances.

Unless of course every Democrat Senator/Governor has some kind of skeleton in his closet and Biden was the cleanest guy they could find.

4
thuggishruggishtrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

How long until Biden gets swapped out for (my prediction)...Michelle Obama?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
khp041000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. His name is Trump.

4
CaptRied 4 points ago +4 / -0

He specifically asked the Secretary of the Senate to release his records. She said she can not comply with his request. Is she even the correct person to make this request to? Do not be fooled by this liars deception. He was asked for his records. If he was serious about complying, then he would have his lawyers produced them.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
iIndianaJones 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +2 / -1

"No malarkey, no malarkey. You're the malarkey!"

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Lispychicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's so damned either way. HAHAHHA. Ahh, this was the Dems best huh? lol

1
guanaco32 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once they've finished hillarying those files they'll come up with a loophole that will let them be released. Then of course, creepy uncle joe will claim complete vindication.