I am trying to debate you but you will not respond to any of my replies with links to scientific sources in this thread. Stop spamming your periscope video and answer the questions asked of you like you said you wanted to.
They have confirmed the existence of the common cold. And actually i haven't heard anyone has taken a picture with electron microscope of "coronavirus"
So sars exists but sars2 doesn't? Why does you think the first sars epidemic was real but this second one is fake? The viruses are the same size. Here are images of Sars2:
You have still not explained the large increase in the overall death rate, or the fact that flu deaths are still being reported in every country when you claimed that they "went to zero".
Why do people want to pollute this beautiful forum with this kind of idiocy?
Yes, there is a virus. No, there isn’t a worldwide conspiracy of every single virologist to pretend there is. The Earth is round. The moon actually exists. Gtfo.
Why are all my replies filled with links to scientific sources backing my claims (which you have not refuted), while the only link you shared is to a Periscope that proves absolutely nothing?
Well, we do know that many cases are indeed being misdiagnosed as covid19, but the scale of operation of this whole thing still seems rather bizarre for it to be a complete hoax. Although anything is possible. Even if it is every bit as bad as the 'experts' say, the politicians have wasted no time in leveraging it to milk citizens en masse.
I think the key piece of information will be the constitution of the pcr testing process. I have inquired at a local lab on what goes into the test, but have not heard back so far. More information should come out eventually.
I still have to do a lot more research to prove it, but I would compare it to global warming. Just totally fake science used to gain power.
Some initial points...
Magically flu has disappeared.
The test for the Coronavirus is for RNA that naturally occurs in the body
5g causes oxygen deprivation
But as someone with graduate degree in engineering I've seen how the how scientific complex is just to appease politicians to get funding. And most "Scientists" are just useful idiots that memorized textbooks.
Flu has not disappeared, we can still test for flu type A and B and there are people dying from it.
PCR tests are for the presence of coronavirus RNA, your second statement is absolutely ludicrous. So what about non SARS coronavirus viral testing? Are those just testing "natural" RNA too?
5G mm wavelengths have potential to affect oxygen, but what about people who are getting sick and dying in rural areas far from where it is being rolled out?
You are just wrong on RNA. The coronavirus test IS for RNA that naturally appears anyway.
Explain to this frailbrained nonengineer how RNA for any external virus is naturally present in the human body, outside of infection from said virus.
They are classifying any death as coronavirus. Its all old people with multiple diseases.
They may be overreporting deaths and the median age of death is 80, but that does not change the fact there has been a number of young and healthy people free of comorbidities who have died. You still have not addressed the large increase in overall deaths around the world, which are pretty hard to fake if the people are actually still living.
I have to go work on my million dollar backed startup, say gnite to your mom when you leave your basement.
Nice cop out and deflection to avoid seriously replying to my counterarguments backed by scientific sources. If you actually cared about your hypothesis and were geniune, you would stay to discuss, but the fact that you just committed hit and run trolling on this board lends credence to my suspicion you are not geniune.
Covid numbers can be faked. Overall death numbers are much harder to hide as these are real people who stop living. How do you explain the capacity at morgues?
Sitting for only a month is not going to cause deaths all of a sudden.
Who is starving? Stress does cause deaths but I don't think it could be that much.
Deaths are not down in the US, that's an outright lie and makes me question if you're trolling or intentionally spreading disinfo. Back up your absurd statements with links.
It is a United States federal agency, under the Department of Health and Human Services, and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.
I am not going to be distracted into an argument over the morality of the CDC, because I don't support them either. You said that the number of reported flu deaths went to zero. I linked to a source clearly showing there are still tens of thousands of reported flu deaths. How does this not disprove your statement that "flu deaths have went to zero?"
The proof that it exists is genetic sequencing, viewing it under microscopes, and indirectly charting its' effects. You still haven't replied to my source showing that the overall death rate is higher, while you claimed it was lower.
So lame to not be able to debate just call everyone CHINA, you are the equivalent of a liberal who says RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA
I am trying to debate you but you will not respond to any of my replies with links to scientific sources in this thread. Stop spamming your periscope video and answer the questions asked of you like you said you wanted to.
You sounds like a liberal troll. Im not a new account. Been trump supporter since 2016 and just donated to the campaign.
https://imgur.com/a/U9DFfEr
I'm not a new account they say... while displaying their new account icon proudly. Clap.
Struck a nerve did I?
http://pgbovine.net/chinese-english-mistakes.htm
No actually you can only see viruses with the top electron microscopes in the world
Telescopes are for distant objects.
fixed
They have confirmed the existence of the common cold. And actually i haven't heard anyone has taken a picture with electron microscope of "coronavirus"
So what you're saying is you can see coronavirus in a microscope, like OP stated?
You could only possibly see coronvirus in the top electron microscope lab in the world, but no one has done it
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15134191
Hey engineer boy, why don't you go engineer some actual facts for a change
Chicom, or at least nonengineer doubly confirmed.
So sars exists but sars2 doesn't? Why does you think the first sars epidemic was real but this second one is fake? The viruses are the same size. Here are images of Sars2:
https://www.sciencealert.com/this-is-what-the-covid-19-virus-looks-like-under-electron-microscopes
You have still not explained the large increase in the overall death rate, or the fact that flu deaths are still being reported in every country when you claimed that they "went to zero".
Why do people want to pollute this beautiful forum with this kind of idiocy?
Yes, there is a virus. No, there isn’t a worldwide conspiracy of every single virologist to pretend there is. The Earth is round. The moon actually exists. Gtfo.
Fedposting happens even here
This would be interesting. But having every country in the world in on the conspiracy would be kind of tough.
Its all old people with other illnesses
No it's not just old people. For a supposed engineer you are using quite the unscientific methodology to back up your claims
Its all other diseases flu/etc. You wouldn't know science if an apple fell from a tree and hit you in the head. I have high up degree in engineering.
High up. It's official folks.
Chicom confirmed.
Get in here pedes this shit is hilarious
Why are all my replies filled with links to scientific sources backing my claims (which you have not refuted), while the only link you shared is to a Periscope that proves absolutely nothing?
Well, we do know that many cases are indeed being misdiagnosed as covid19, but the scale of operation of this whole thing still seems rather bizarre for it to be a complete hoax. Although anything is possible. Even if it is every bit as bad as the 'experts' say, the politicians have wasted no time in leveraging it to milk citizens en masse.
I think the key piece of information will be the constitution of the pcr testing process. I have inquired at a local lab on what goes into the test, but have not heard back so far. More information should come out eventually.
I'm an expert in physics, computers etc.
Only top electron microscopes can actually see a virus.
Are all coronaviruses fake or just this one? Is it impossible for a new form of coronavirus with higher mortality to be mutated or created? Why?
Im a real deal trump supporter and engineer.
I have 2016 periscope of trump rally.... https://www.pscp.tv/w/cW3rwTFlUkV4cW1ZVm15UXd8MWdxeHZCeW15WXp4QtdWhSX73tBW-W9g1HXF-0Ds_0Q1rZnl5FkLlyHQdj1Z?t=7s
I donate in 2016 and just donated to 2020 campaign https://imgur.com/a/U9DFfEr
Here is me holding 2016 trump hat in front of thedonald.win. IM THE REAL DEAL https://imgur.com/a/98Qqi3W
Would come as no shock to me at all for this to be correct.
You sounds like a genuine bloke
I mean ... Do you have sources? Accumulated data?
I've thought this a lot myself but am interested if you have done the research (i haven't).
I still have to do a lot more research to prove it, but I would compare it to global warming. Just totally fake science used to gain power.
Some initial points...
But as someone with graduate degree in engineering I've seen how the how scientific complex is just to appease politicians to get funding. And most "Scientists" are just useful idiots that memorized textbooks.
Flu has not disappeared, we can still test for flu type A and B and there are people dying from it.
PCR tests are for the presence of coronavirus RNA, your second statement is absolutely ludicrous. So what about non SARS coronavirus viral testing? Are those just testing "natural" RNA too?
5G mm wavelengths have potential to affect oxygen, but what about people who are getting sick and dying in rural areas far from where it is being rolled out?
False. Every country is still reporting flu deaths. I have linked you a source. Here is another since you don't like the original: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/weekly-national-flu-reports-2019-to-2020-season
Explain to this frailbrained nonengineer how RNA for any external virus is naturally present in the human body, outside of infection from said virus.
They may be overreporting deaths and the median age of death is 80, but that does not change the fact there has been a number of young and healthy people free of comorbidities who have died. You still have not addressed the large increase in overall deaths around the world, which are pretty hard to fake if the people are actually still living.
Nice cop out and deflection to avoid seriously replying to my counterarguments backed by scientific sources. If you actually cared about your hypothesis and were geniune, you would stay to discuss, but the fact that you just committed hit and run trolling on this board lends credence to my suspicion you are not geniune.
How do you explain the statistically significant increase in overall deaths all across the world?
To be fair, none of the numbers of deaths are real...
Covid numbers can be faked. Overall death numbers are much harder to hide as these are real people who stop living. How do you explain the capacity at morgues?
Do you have a specific country you want to discuss?
Deaths are down in USA.
Lockdown is causing death through stress/starvation
Sitting all day raises your risk of heart disease, diabetes, stroke, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol
Sitting for only a month is not going to cause deaths all of a sudden.
Who is starving? Stress does cause deaths but I don't think it could be that much.
Deaths are not down in the US, that's an outright lie and makes me question if you're trolling or intentionally spreading disinfo. Back up your absurd statements with links.
Im not your google. Flu deaths have magically gone to zero. You got to be kidding me. Net deaths are down. If you are so smart prove me otherwise.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you to support your claims, not me to disprove them. But I have time and will oblige.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/14/coronavirus-pushes-england-death-rate-to-highest-level-ever
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm
Tell me, as an "engineer" how does it feel to have every single one of your assertions disproven?
I am not going to be distracted into an argument over the morality of the CDC, because I don't support them either. You said that the number of reported flu deaths went to zero. I linked to a source clearly showing there are still tens of thousands of reported flu deaths. How does this not disprove your statement that "flu deaths have went to zero?"
The proof that it exists is genetic sequencing, viewing it under microscopes, and indirectly charting its' effects. You still haven't replied to my source showing that the overall death rate is higher, while you claimed it was lower.