2940
Comments (255)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
85
FreedomAintFreeYo 85 points ago +85 / -0

Plenty of pushback on this - but instead of discussing the content of her words and those of the many doctors featured in this video, they are just attacking her, calling her an Anti-Vaxxer, which is in my opinion the new climate change denier. Anyone who dares question any vaccine is now considered an Anti-Vaxxer. Anyone who supports this president is a Racist. Anyone who questions the Paris Accord is a climate change denier. Seeing a pattern yet?

37
Work2gethrBiglyOrDie 37 points ago +37 / -0

Their use of labels against us is like putting us into garbage bags, and who wants to look inside a sealed garbage bag?

28
MocksFordComma 28 points ago +28 / -0

It's shutdown language. If I can label you as a non-prog lunatic, nothing you say (even the truth) will then be valid. Racist. Sexist. Homophobe. Denier. Anti-. Whatever ... all I have to do is slap a silencing label on you and walk away. No debate. No thinking. Nothing.

9
needmoreinput 9 points ago +9 / -0

It works though.

7
4
1776-or-1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh wow conservapedia, never seen it, looks nice!

6
ReedJones 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good point. Don't forget "Alt-" that's the label I hate the most.

4
1776-or-1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like what even is alt? You're right wing or you're not. Pretty basic binary. 2 scoops!

5
SordidPontification 5 points ago +6 / -1

I agree with them though. It's silly to be opposed to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Because you can't strictly be opposed to something that will never exist. :)

For people who don't realize this is a JOKE and have a knee-jerk reaction to downvote, or who think that there will magically be a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, consider:

Earlier, I linked to a review of SARS-CoV vaccines from 2009 which demonstrated that, although it should be possible, no one has ever demonstrated one to work successfully--and of these, whole inactivated virus provoked an immune disease in animal models. Not exactly something you want.

There were no human studies, and the entire idea of vaccinating against SARS-CoV-2 seems to me to be complete fantasy as of this writing.

Possible? Sure. But there's a tremendous uphill battle.

32
IAmAnElephante 32 points ago +32 / -0

I can not understand how people get anti-vaxx out of this documentary though. She even says immunotheraphy is something she recommends. Like many, people are skeptical of covid-19 vaccine, not all vaccines. B.c you say no to 1 vaccine doesnt mean you're anti-vaxx...its fucking mind numbing

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
13
sun_wolf 13 points ago +13 / -0

I don’t think they will make Bill Gates microchip vaccine mandatory though. They will say it’s not mandatory because this is a free country, but for safety, anyone who does not get it cannot purchase food or work a job. But it’s not mandatory.

9
SordidPontification 9 points ago +9 / -0

As a Linux user, the normie response to Gates makes me feel vindicated.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
8
DannySaySay 8 points ago +8 / -0

Check out her wikipedia page.

Literally says: "Known for: Anti-vaxx"

(i.e. ppl not getting it from the video. they not watch video because big tech told them it was too scary)

10
SheepleMaster 10 points ago +10 / -0

Check the date of modification. They've labelled a doctors page as "conspiracy theorist" right after he posted skepticism on Youtube

5
SordidPontification 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're deleting MedCram's videos as well when all he's been doing is posting existing research for and against something. One of his hydroxychloroquine videos was removed, and it ironically discussed some of the negative research.

4
Gingersmom2009 4 points ago +4 / -0

She SAYS she is not anti-vaxx.

28
reefacts 28 points ago +28 / -0

A buddy told me, "yeah, I've been seeing that video float around but I heard she's an anti-vaxxer so I haven't watched it". LOL. She was literally asked if she was an anti-vaxxer and she said, "no, absolutely not" when asked. She continued, "My job is to develop immune therapies, that's what vaccines are".

Watch @ 9:57: https://www.brighteon.com/91f524b4-656f-4c46-bab5-01dea4ac1cf1

13
ShiffsDeadHooker 13 points ago +13 / -0

Exactly the point I was about to make. The snopes "debunking" of this video is totally ridiculous too.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +4 / -7
9
traveravis 9 points ago +9 / -0

You didn't watch it

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
6
reefacts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whatever helps you sleep

4
SheepleMaster 4 points ago +5 / -1

Vaccine's are one type of immune therapy, but immune therapy doesn't have to be a vaccine. She's being misleading if she said that.

I agree with you here. Still, few people are anti-vaxx, just choice-vaxx. Once people start talking about FORCED vaccinations, then alllllllllll the anti-vaxx shit goes into overdrive. Do you get why? I'm pro-vax but if you are going to try to mandate something, I'm going to dig my hardest to discover every reason against it.

Force-vaxxers really need to lay down the fascism pipe and find common ground with the average pro-vaxxer.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
13
RocketSurgeon22 13 points ago +13 / -0

She flat out supports vaccines. She works in creating them. Anyone saying she is anti-vaxx looks like an idiot.

She says we have never been successful at creating an RSA vaccination. It has killed more than it has saved. She is saying a vaccination is questionable for covid-19.