2307
Comments (61)
sorted by:
132
ThomasGiferson 132 points ago +132 / -0

I still think she made that deal with Bill Clinton in the infamous airport meeting. Make the case against Hillary go away, and you have Scalia's seat.

36
stellamonkey 36 points ago +36 / -0

cankles, cankles, cankles...sigh....

26
ParkerTruman 26 points ago +26 / -0

I thought that was all about her staying on as Hillarys AG.

26
ThomasGiferson 26 points ago +26 / -0

I've heard that before. I'm unaware of any evidence for that. I thought it was probably untrue, since she was already the AG. Why would she take the risk of violating the law in squashing an investigation into Hillary for a job she already had?

12
ParkerTruman 12 points ago +12 / -0

They never think about getting caught. She wanted to keep her job and was worried Hillary would make a change? Everyone thought Hilldog was going to win. She may have been lining up her ducks in a row? No matter her motive, remain AG or possible SCOTUS seat, its still wrong

7
MAGADUDE 7 points ago +7 / -0

She would stay on as AG but pick up RBG's seat when she retires. Scalia's seat was to go to that Garret(?) guy Obama floated. From what I understand

7
jasper_db1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Merrick Garland and I agree - Hilldog would have appointed Lynch to replace RBG. RBG was probably planning her retirement when Trump won. She's been hanging on ever since.

6
I_no_asshoe 6 points ago +6 / -0

RBG should have been worried Loretta Lunch was going to eat her to get the spot on SCOTUS.

3
ThomasGiferson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Garland's nomination was caput by April of 2016, before the tarmac meeting. A new President H. Clinton would have no obligation to renominate 0bama's nomination. Why would Lynch commit a fairly evident crime to wait for RGB to retire? Is there any evidence at all that RGB would retire? None that I've heard.

3
jasper_db1 3 points ago +3 / -0

there was talk of HRC sticking with Garland herself back in 2016: https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/08/what-happens-merrick-garland-if-hillary-clinton-wins/

If anything, it would have been a poke in the eye to the GOP to appoint an Obama nominee. Regarding RBG - none that I saw either but there were rumors of her retiring to let the first woman president nominate her replacement.

4
ConsrvspkgNJ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because Hillary was ahead in the polls by about 380 points and no one ever thought she would lose. When you know you are going to win, when you know you put your people in power to ensure all the incriminating evidence is scrubbed clean and you know no one will ever be held to account.....sure you can ask for a SCOTUS seat if you Git Er Done. In their minds, getting caught was an utter impossibility

12
BirthHole 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just two old friends saying 'Hi' and talking about grandkids..

9
HowardRoark 9 points ago +9 / -0

GrAnDcHiLdReN aNd GoLf 👶🏿👶🏼⛳️🏌️‍♂️

3
FreeBased1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I still think she made that deal with Bill Clinton in the infamous airport meeting. Make the case against Hillary go away, and you have Scalia's seat.

Wow I am impressed! And they were SO SURE hillary would win, then just go ahead and kill Scalia.

12
ThomasGiferson 12 points ago +12 / -0

Scalia died before this meeting, I'm thinking. Let me check.

Scalia's death: Feb 13, 2016. Tarmac meeting: June 27, 2016.

By April, the Senate GOP had put the kabosh on this nomination. If Hillary was elected, she could then immediately nominate Lynch.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
40
johnbillaby 40 points ago +40 / -0

I think the plan to fuck Flynn came after Trump already won, probably around January 5th.

32
kag-2020- 32 points ago +32 / -0

The plan was to fuck Trump by any means necessary.

29
chopz 29 points ago +30 / -1

you know.... like releasing a pieced together Frankenstein SARS/HiV virus that would destroy the absolute beauty of an economy we were seeing

9
kuningus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not a crime in California, unfortunately.

2
WalterEKurtz 2 points ago +2 / -0

How did that polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA get into Covid-19? https://thedonald.win/p/Ffb07YFV/proof-wuhan-virus-was-geneticall/c/

tldw: virus was modified in a lab

2
cuntard 2 points ago +2 / -0

it looks like that polybasic site occurred at the 680th amino acid locus. in corona viruses, specifically in the spike proteins, there is a stretch that contains a lot of arginine residues and residues that can are close enough to arginine that function isn't destroyed. this makes it more likely for mutations to occur there, as the virus would still be able to function as a virus. this area (670-700) also happens to be the location of the S1/S2 cleavage site in corona viruses and mutations in that regions have been seen in other human and non-human coronaviruses. In this particular case, the insertion mutation simply resulted in an amino acid shift to RXXR or RXK, which makes it cleavable by furins. thus far, all evidence suggests natural mutation, not targeted genome splicing.

10
johnbillaby 10 points ago +11 / -1

Oh definitely.

23
magnokor 23 points ago +23 / -0

Rotten. Dirty. Clinton.

As soon as they appeared, knew they were up to no good.

The secret dealings with the two planes meeting, just like crime leaders would meet in secret with their limos parked next to each other, that was one of The Swamp's really big attacks on everyone else.

A leading Supreme Court analyst thinks Attorney General Loretta Lynch is the "most likely candidate" to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

Black Democrats to Obama: Pick Lynch for Supreme Court

A few months after saying she didn't want Barry to put her on the court she was caught at the airport with Clinton.

Mar 8, 2016 Attorney General Loretta Lynch has told the White House she does not want to be nominated to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.

On June 28, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch crossed paths with former President Bill Clinton at Sky Harbor during her visit to the Arizona Law Enforcement Academy in Phoenix.

She knew that her dirty dealings she had done, and was going to do later, would have made her confirmation hearings a tad uncomfortable?

Horrible people. Very sad when those who are supposed to stop the criminals are the criminals.

11
RexCollumSilvarum 11 points ago +11 / -0

the "most likely candidate" to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia.

And we all know why he's "late".

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
ronin551 6 points ago +6 / -0

What are you saying? Every day people die sleeping with a pillow pressed over their face. Nothing suspicious about that.

22
Donkeyballs 22 points ago +22 / -0

She better get a lawyer. I would suggest she stay away from Eric Holders firm. But hey, she’s made good decisions so far.

21
journalist 21 points ago +21 / -0

America has been dodging some major bullets in the judiciary branch lately.

11
DarkEyedJunco 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fore ! ... Look Out Loretta !!

8
nufosmatic 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ya think she'll get it?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
fuqdup 7 points ago +7 / -0

What an appropriate last name.

6
Illuminaughtie 6 points ago +6 / -0

cankletastic!

6
Sirbigusdickus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have you seen the Roman columns she calls legs? Mega structures on Discovery should do an episode for those fucking things. Holy shit.

3
ServerTowerofBabel 3 points ago +3 / -0

.. but it isn't undone. How do we get those years back?

3
BowelSharpton 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gonna have to seek out Barnum & Bailey bankruptcy/fire sale for some elephant-sized cankle shackles for this pig. Hopefully The Proverbial Thumb Has Been Removed from the Dike (not Richard MadCow) with Flynn and we can FINALLY hear ALL about the 'talk about the grandkids' on the tarmac with this honker and Bill The Rapist.

2
BowelSharpton 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
NeoSporen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

2
DeusVultIntensifies 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't wait to see cankles in shackles.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TaggartCiscontinenta 1 point ago +1 / -0

we should spin this as a hate crime then. You know they’ll prosecute someone then.

1
Choppermagic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Arrest her and see who she turns against

1
H4yw1r3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just out of curiosity, did she even remotely stand a chance at a scotus nomination?

1
Deaditewater 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fortunately she was at least 2 railroadings away

1
SharkTeamTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that's a chargeable offense.

Will she be the one to flip on Barry?

1
Hexagon 1 point ago +1 / -0

And yet no charges, no one in jail... no one even disgraced.

1
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Such a cunt.

1
M3CJC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cankels

1
Mr_Beanths 1 point ago +1 / -0

What an ugly, fat ankled hoe.

1
MySidesGoUp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pieces of shit, everywhere

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Short trial, short drop, fast stop

1
Nellie_the_Beaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the Quid Pro Quo was all done BY THE BOOK!! Lynch even sent herself an email in her last minutes in the White House saying so!

1
LibertyStillMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds almost like a quid pro quo..... But that’s crazy talk!

1
FishStickIsles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cankles.

1
Ruejitsu 1 point ago +1 / -0

RIP Antonin Scalia.

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

This c*nt still needs to spend time in jail for inciting violence in her nasty video to the american public calling for marching and blood

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4iduX8Tceo&list=UUWaSnCxBPg6OuC_3EbdCeMg

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally 100% true, she was hoping for a seat at the high court.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1