I believe most didn't mind the F bomb, rather his associating it with the name of Jesus Christ. A valid criticism, considering Dave's penchant as a high road moralist homosexual promoted by ConInc as a representative of conservatism.
Most of them seem to be very respectful and not hating on Rubin at all. I must say that while it doesn't bother me enough to comment on it, I kind of share their sentiment as a Christian.
This is common. Libs suddenly care about the language used when they don't want to talk about the underlying argument. Even conservative sailors are suddenly not allowed to curse.
Let’s face it 99.9% are homeless BECAUSE of their drug habits.
So these hotels proprietors and private business owners are being strong armed by the state into providing a free service and free amenities to drug addicts, and being forced to allow these freeloading addicts who are used to shitting on the sidewalk to mingle with paying customers, families and tourists.
All those poor homeless gotta have the comforts of home, dontchaknow. Probably trying to stave off dealing with a hotel full of unstable people all going through withdrawal at the same time.
What are you talking about? I never said the weed jumped into their pipes. Who would I be blaming, if not drug users and the government making us pay for their drugs?
This is something that always bothers me. Swearing with God's name is not using the lord's name in vain. Using God to fulfill personal desires or make false oaths is what that commandment addresses. It's right in the words, vain, referring to vanity.
"God told me you need to have sex with me to save your soul." = Not Ok
"I swear to God I'll pay you back." then don't pay back = Not Ok
I saw this tweet last night and I thought "meh, its not a good use of tax payers dollars but of all the things the libtards have done to outrage me the last 30 years this isn't one of them". I'm not in favour of this however I can see the logic behind it. I'm not sure I'd want to deal with a bunch of mentally ill lunatics detoxing, losing their shit from nicotine withdrawals all quarantined at the same time.
Also didn't like taking the name of my Lord as a swear word. Anyway I'm not outraged by this Rubin tweet but as I said "meh".
Just spoke to my wife about this, she works for Mariott, and SF wants to put homeless up at the Ritz Carlton in their executive apartment suites. Don't worry though the taxpayer will be held responsible for any damages done to the property.
A surprisingly large number of Comments are a bunch of bleeding hearts upset he used the f-word.
Really in 2020?
I believe most didn't mind the F bomb, rather his associating it with the name of Jesus Christ. A valid criticism, considering Dave's penchant as a high road moralist homosexual promoted by ConInc as a representative of conservatism.
when you can't attack the topic attack the person
Most of them seem to be very respectful and not hating on Rubin at all. I must say that while it doesn't bother me enough to comment on it, I kind of share their sentiment as a Christian.
This is common. Libs suddenly care about the language used when they don't want to talk about the underlying argument. Even conservative sailors are suddenly not allowed to curse.
Jesus cucks. I bet those ladies are getting rammed by Chad on the side, but don't insult Jesus' name!!!!
Let’s face it 99.9% are homeless BECAUSE of their drug habits.
So these hotels proprietors and private business owners are being strong armed by the state into providing a free service and free amenities to drug addicts, and being forced to allow these freeloading addicts who are used to shitting on the sidewalk to mingle with paying customers, families and tourists.
What could possibly go wrong.
California no surprise there...
TFW you realize your taxes buy drugs for homeless
Prostitutes? What about Prostitutes. Everyone deserves free sex.
When you consider the liberal "women" who would volunteer, even poop-covered hobos probably couldn't perform.
All those poor homeless gotta have the comforts of home, dontchaknow. Probably trying to stave off dealing with a hotel full of unstable people all going through withdrawal at the same time.
But weed is not addictive nor harmful in any way, right?
Way to blame things and not people for their choices and behavior. Do you also blame guns for shootings and fast food for making people fat.
What are you talking about? I never said the weed jumped into their pipes. Who would I be blaming, if not drug users and the government making us pay for their drugs?
How can the homeless stay in hotels, yet regular citizens are banned? Do the homeless have immunity from the Wuan Virus?
in SF, the hobos are covered in a thick coat of crusted feces, which inhibits microbial transmission.
...San Francisco is covered in a thick coat of crusted feces...
DUDE. FUCKING CLOWN WORLD.
Sounds about right
Also mail in ballots.
This is something that always bothers me. Swearing with God's name is not using the lord's name in vain. Using God to fulfill personal desires or make false oaths is what that commandment addresses. It's right in the words, vain, referring to vanity.
"God told me you need to have sex with me to save your soul." = Not Ok
"I swear to God I'll pay you back." then don't pay back = Not Ok
"God damnit!" = Ok
I saw this tweet last night and I thought "meh, its not a good use of tax payers dollars but of all the things the libtards have done to outrage me the last 30 years this isn't one of them". I'm not in favour of this however I can see the logic behind it. I'm not sure I'd want to deal with a bunch of mentally ill lunatics detoxing, losing their shit from nicotine withdrawals all quarantined at the same time.
Also didn't like taking the name of my Lord as a swear word. Anyway I'm not outraged by this Rubin tweet but as I said "meh".
Just spoke to my wife about this, she works for Mariott, and SF wants to put homeless up at the Ritz Carlton in their executive apartment suites. Don't worry though the taxpayer will be held responsible for any damages done to the property.
/facepalm