Same thing as Trayvon Martin case, he saw the men stopped in front of him, saw they were armed, but chose to attack, rather than flee or surrender.
He could have stopped, he could have ran off the into the side yards or woods, or turned back the opposite direction. would have saved his life, although he probably would have still been arrested.
And just like Zimmerman, the men in chasing him could have called it off, or made sure he never got close enough to them for him to even try to attack.
It might have been better for everyone if they would have not tried to force the confrontation by stopping the truck, but legally, they did not break the law, and he did break the law when he attacked them,
I am a staunch 2A defender, but they probavly did breakk the law. Most likely they will be determined to have brandished a weapon, which means any response from him was self defense. Remember, he didn't do anything violent or aggressive. We don't know if he was doing something wrong, but there is no evidence he was a deadly threat. A random person showing up with a gun and demanding you stop, while brandishing a gun, is easily interpretable as a threatening act.
This opinion is based on the video and evidence we have. I see a lot of speculation about a hammer earlier and such. They are still going to have to deal with chasing him down. This is a hard one to say the two guys didn't create the deadly situation. Even if the guy who was killed can't be completely absolved of some responsibility once all the facts are on the table.
Same thing as Trayvon Martin case, he saw the men stopped in front of him, saw they were armed, but chose to attack, rather than flee or surrender.
He could have stopped, he could have ran off the into the side yards or woods, or turned back the opposite direction. would have saved his life, although he probably would have still been arrested.
And just like Zimmerman, the men in chasing him could have called it off, or made sure he never got close enough to them for him to even try to attack.
It might have been better for everyone if they would have not tried to force the confrontation by stopping the truck, but legally, they did not break the law, and he did break the law when he attacked them,
Both of these idiots had a... moment. Boondocks featured a great documentary on this social phenomenon.
I am a staunch 2A defender, but they probavly did breakk the law. Most likely they will be determined to have brandished a weapon, which means any response from him was self defense. Remember, he didn't do anything violent or aggressive. We don't know if he was doing something wrong, but there is no evidence he was a deadly threat. A random person showing up with a gun and demanding you stop, while brandishing a gun, is easily interpretable as a threatening act.
This opinion is based on the video and evidence we have. I see a lot of speculation about a hammer earlier and such. They are still going to have to deal with chasing him down. This is a hard one to say the two guys didn't create the deadly situation. Even if the guy who was killed can't be completely absolved of some responsibility once all the facts are on the table.
Fuck you, you gun grabbing piece of shit.
They didn't break any laws, and you're a retard.
Open carry is legal in Georgia. Performing a citizen's arrest on a suspect fleeing a felony is perfectly legal.
Grabbing another man's shotgun? Very illegal and definitely deserving of death.
Fuck you. The facts are: the McMichael family is innocent, Arbery is retard who deserved to get shot dead.