Could someone please tell me how to win an argument with a Democrat who pretty much laughs at your evidence of criminality in the "Russian Hoax" because, "Nothing was done after all the fuss about Bengazi and nothing is going to happen now either."
So more or less, I guess it doesn't matter if it's criminal or not to them if they can get away with it.
That's so disheartening. I don't even know how to respond to that. Saying "this time it will be different" just gets harder laughs.
They're so arrogant and so sure their party can't be touched. Either that or I am just lousy at red-pilling people.
Tips on what to say to that would be appreciated.
I know this is difficult but there are no easy answers. You have to remember that while you may base your arguments on facts and logic, it is irrelevant to them because they are solely emotional creatures. They all feel morally superior to you and think they know what's best for everyone. However, if you can make them angry, sad, upset, etc you have a chance at victory. Since I'm not in need of remaining friends with anyone, while in a debate with an identified leftist, I just attack them emotionally. Relentless emotional attacks. Repeated statements to the effect that they are in fact worthless and stupid etc, but I make sure to never call them those things.
Well, hopefully someone else is around that could get red pilled by your conversation but true lefties are lost.
Here's a thought. ...And that's what's wrong with your party. You don't care who cheats, lies, steals or even murders, as long as there's no accountability. As long as you have power, nothing else matters. You're just Stalin 2.0 and that's how you'll be remembered.
That sounds good. Thanks!
You can only red-pill people when they’re ready to be red-pilled. Don’t waste your energy on those who are still brainwashed, but be ready with the facts for anyone who’s willing to have a genuine discussion.
Show them documented facts. If they won't accept facts they are delusional. Sympathize with your friend, expressing concern as failing to accept facts leads to cognitive dissonance which can be very difficult to deal with.
This works every time. It drives them nuts because it shows them you are factual and compassionate.
They will try to change the subject but don't let them.
In the same boat as you fellow pede. I have had little to no luck red-pilling anyone with words. Sometimes it's easier and more effective to SHOW people rather than tell people (although that presents its own challenge of getting those people to actually sit down and watch). This YouTube channel (particularly this video & series i'm linking) is short enough and to the point and helped my wife to "un-plug from the matrix". If you can show that leftists of all colours and creeds have jumped ship...you MIGHT have a chance.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ssNEJD3xC8A
Benghazi hearings looked into gross negligence, but no laws or specific State Department rules were broken. The hearings never contemplated people would go to jail.
Russian Hoax - Evidence of criminality and blatant violations of specific DOJ rules and protocols where people can be held accountable and go to prison.
A bigger argument, IMO, is the general public doesn't have to rely of the State Department to protect us from being attacked by extremists in an embassy. We do rely on the DOJ to protect our rights on our own soil from ..... the DOJ.