Could someone please tell me how to win an argument with a Democrat who pretty much laughs at your evidence of criminality in the "Russian Hoax" because, "Nothing was done after all the fuss about Bengazi and nothing is going to happen now either."
So more or less, I guess it doesn't matter if it's criminal or not to them if they can get away with it.
That's so disheartening. I don't even know how to respond to that. Saying "this time it will be different" just gets harder laughs.
They're so arrogant and so sure their party can't be touched. Either that or I am just lousy at red-pilling people.
Tips on what to say to that would be appreciated.
Benghazi hearings looked into gross negligence, but no laws or specific State Department rules were broken. The hearings never contemplated people would go to jail.
Russian Hoax - Evidence of criminality and blatant violations of specific DOJ rules and protocols where people can be held accountable and go to prison.
A bigger argument, IMO, is the general public doesn't have to rely of the State Department to protect us from being attacked by extremists in an embassy. We do rely on the DOJ to protect our rights on our own soil from ..... the DOJ.