983
Comments (10)
sorted by:
11
Cue_Cumber 11 points ago +11 / -0

And it goes way beyond just being dependent on them for food and thus "needing" them. Never forget: Communism's favorite method of mass murder and genocide is deliberate famine causing mass starvation and death. I repeat, it's their favorite method of depopulation. Those 100 million+ deaths over the 20th century? Most were caused by engineered famines followed by starvation. THAT is what this is all about; never forget it!

3
YourDaddyKnowsBest [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. Mao n Lenin wrote the book on mass starvation

7
SDsc0rch 7 points ago +7 / -0

you either have RIGHTS - or you have PERMISSION
we're either FREE MEN - or we are SUBJECTS
this girl "gets it"

4
YourDaddyKnowsBest [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. She does !!

2
TickleMissle 2 points ago +2 / -0

No E-Girls

1
MooCow1980 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought we were equal opportunity patriots

2
TickleMissle 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are. Just no e-girls. This not what you think it is.

1
MooCow1980 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's an egirl? I'm pretty naive.

2
TickleMissle 2 points ago +2 / -0

E-girls are girls (but also guys) that take trends, subjects, movements that are popular and create a personality within it in order to become somewhat of an internet celebrity. A less political example would be a hot girl that streams games online while taking donations. She claims to be a gamer but in reality she is just capitalizing on the boys/men on the internet that orbit her. In the end, she does not care about gamers and would be willing to throw them under the bus for a buck.

Within politics, these people usually end up being a mouth piece for larger money groups wanting to utilize their viewers/reach. In this case, her tweets are being promoted in this forum by a particular organization. A particular organization that includes about every single major conservative personality on the internet. A particular organization that you and I agree with 90% of the time when it comes to politics/our country. However the 10% is important when you factor in the entire online discussion is being led and pointed by these internet personalities that are pushed onto us (gatekeeping). They flood the conversation with relatively unimportant noise and latch on to any conversation that will give them exposure. They ultimately control the point and direction of the conversation and ultimately our goals.

I'm sure she's a fine person and holds conservative views most of us would agree with. If her message is good...then whatever. However we need to realize these internet personalities (egirls) are in the limelight for money and are subject to the interests of the ones providing the money. Sometimes the ones providing the money have agendas we don't agree with.

TL;DR No e-girls. They're selling our movement out. /end rant

2
MooCow1980 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the extended clarification. I appreciate it.