2598
Comments (99)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
81
Kerry000 81 points ago +82 / -1

And nothing has been a bigger contributor to worldwide poverty than globalism.

61
deleted 61 points ago +62 / -1
39
Liberty_Prime 39 points ago +40 / -1

I think this is something a lot of people miss.

The UN drafted this shit decades ago.

Replace the bourgeoisie with "The West," and everything falls into place. Race has also been added as a component.

30
deleted 30 points ago +32 / -2
16
Liberty_Prime 16 points ago +17 / -1

Exactamundo.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're not wong. :) You're right!

5
ChicomUberAlles 5 points ago +5 / -0

wong knows what is what. bye bye bank account too if you disagree. Can't associate with the racist subhuman race. Than means eviction too, landlord doesn't take cash crypto or dicksuck. Maybe dicksuck is a good tender soon, idk.

The sheer fucking hubris.

8
Techrev 8 points ago +8 / -0

Identity more than race. It's easy to convince a group that shares obvious things in common that they can't win. Then you blame racism.

8
Liberty_Prime 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can adopt that. It has morphed, you're right.

3
64-19-06-24-87 3 points ago +3 / -0

Globalism is just Communism enforced by a special sort of people

25
BeefyBelisarius 25 points ago +26 / -1

That's by design.

"People say that poverty is bad, but in fact poverty is good. The poorer people are, the more revolutionary they are. It is dreadful to imagine a time when everyone will be rich." - Mao

15
publ1us 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yep, it's a feedback loop that they use to seize more power based on the problems their policies created.

5
stratocaster_patriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds a bit like Bernie.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Again communists, like liberals, must lie. It's inherent in the ideology. They must self-contradict and be hypocritical.

Mao himself certainly wasn't starving, the fat fuck.

3
xzibit_b 3 points ago +3 / -0

They certainly have to lie but the contradictions are a result of the stupidity of the ideology rather than intentional. Intentional contradictions imply they can be coherent and make sense at the drop of a dime. (Narrator: They can't).

3
CQVFEFE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I guess we can pity liberals and commies to the extent they are stupid, or weak, or radicalized by media and socialist politcians, or victims of persuasive propaganda, unable to accept responsibililty for the breathtaking hypocrisy inherent in their chosen ideology.

At the same time if I ask myself, did I deliberately intend to be a conservative/libertarian? the answer is no. It just rings true and right, without the slightest effort, question, or doubt. It's like, of COURSE free enterprise, free markets, USA, and Trump. Of course NOT the screaming hate-left and their seething racist brigades on the news, brimming with menace and open anti-American animus. My choice to be on the right isn't intentional so much as organic, just as I didn't intend to like the music I like. I suspect leftoids are in the same boat (only theirs is sinking :)

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
WinstonOrwell 3 points ago +3 / -0

Best depiction there is showing the correlation between wealth and health -- with capitalism of course being the engine of wealth:

https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-avg-securebrowser&hsimp=yhs-securebrowser&hspart=avg&p=200+years+hans+rosling#id=1&vid=fed878e324a0717403f9c01b349ef5e2&action=click