If you are in an argument, tell anyone you "know" someone who is a scientist that actually created a disease tracking system and went to Atlanta to present it to the Center for Disease Control. (that someone is me)
It's past time to quarantine the old folks with diseases, and let everyone else back to work, with no reservations. It doesn't hurt children, we need them to get the antibodies for herd immunity, and we are killing people economically (suicide is one good example)
The Science Priests have disgraced themselves over Wu Flu. I was prepared to concede a pandemic, that it was serious, and some sort of action was required. But the lies, TDS and misinformation are a joke. And now the WHO are suddenly the 'source of truth' for YouTube, and an excuse to ban creators. The WHO are the worst offenders, and their commie leader is a crook.
There are some that argue that masks and 'social distancing' are a total waste of time, and even call into question the nature of viruses. I'm not really across this, no medical background at all, but worth further investigation given what we know about the medical industry.
I remember getting in an argument with someone about how leftists exploit grant money to avoid real jobs, real working, etc. And their excuse was "For what,100 thousand dollars?? Lolololol" and the sad truth is that people are doing it for far less in many cases.
I am so sick of seeing the twitter leftist progressive mob trying to use "science" as a club to beat down anyone they say doesn't automatically bow down to them because of "the science".
Whenever I get into with one of them, I like to point out that 100% of the "top scientist" in the world were wrong about the earth being flat, they wanted to arrest and string up the guy who proved it is round.
And what about Hitler's "scientist"? Surely their science has to be believed right?
Like every other things a progressive leftist tries to do, they only believe in it if it furthers their narrative, and if it dont' suddenly the science becomes racist, or becomes fake somehow.
They really believe that any of these "top scientist" are 100% infallible and if you disagree you are an idiot.
The can't fathom that a "scientist" might have other motives or be bought and paid for, just like any other person or politician.
Their brains can't handle the real world, they need to have it match their world view or it has to be destroyed.
Isn’t it amazing that all you have to do is plant information in the right places to the right people for a specific amount of time and eventually you have free astroturfers?
If you are in an argument, tell anyone you "know" someone who is a scientist that actually created a disease tracking system and went to Atlanta to present it to the Center for Disease Control. (that someone is me)
It's past time to quarantine the old folks with diseases, and let everyone else back to work, with no reservations. It doesn't hurt children, we need them to get the antibodies for herd immunity, and we are killing people economically (suicide is one good example)
Don't worry, I'm sure the experts will get this one right too
I'm still waiting on the Ice Age I was promised in the 70s. That ought to stop the man-made global warming. "Science". Honk! Honk!
The Science Priests have disgraced themselves over Wu Flu. I was prepared to concede a pandemic, that it was serious, and some sort of action was required. But the lies, TDS and misinformation are a joke. And now the WHO are suddenly the 'source of truth' for YouTube, and an excuse to ban creators. The WHO are the worst offenders, and their commie leader is a crook.
There are some that argue that masks and 'social distancing' are a total waste of time, and even call into question the nature of viruses. I'm not really across this, no medical background at all, but worth further investigation given what we know about the medical industry.
I remember getting in an argument with someone about how leftists exploit grant money to avoid real jobs, real working, etc. And their excuse was "For what,100 thousand dollars?? Lolololol" and the sad truth is that people are doing it for far less in many cases.
I agree with what he’s saying, but does something have to be able to be tested in a lab in order to be considered scientific? Genuine question.
I think it needs to be specific, measurable, and repeatable in order to be a scientific study
No, it could also be confirmed by observation. For example, astronomy confirms its predictions by observation.
But climatology can't do even that, since any observation has to be in real-time.
I am so sick of seeing the twitter leftist progressive mob trying to use "science" as a club to beat down anyone they say doesn't automatically bow down to them because of "the science".
Whenever I get into with one of them, I like to point out that 100% of the "top scientist" in the world were wrong about the earth being flat, they wanted to arrest and string up the guy who proved it is round.
And what about Hitler's "scientist"? Surely their science has to be believed right?
Like every other things a progressive leftist tries to do, they only believe in it if it furthers their narrative, and if it dont' suddenly the science becomes racist, or becomes fake somehow.
They really believe that any of these "top scientist" are 100% infallible and if you disagree you are an idiot.
The can't fathom that a "scientist" might have other motives or be bought and paid for, just like any other person or politician.
Their brains can't handle the real world, they need to have it match their world view or it has to be destroyed.
Isn’t it amazing that all you have to do is plant information in the right places to the right people for a specific amount of time and eventually you have free astroturfers?
This fucking guy gets it!
Same goes for all microorganisms! No one has proven viruses to be pathogenic using the scientific method!