3048
Comments (140)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
22
RollWave 22 points ago +23 / -1

Sorry but this title is extraordinarily misleading. This is the same ruling that made the rounds last week with titles like "RGB bitchslaps DC Circuit".

Here's the actual truth:

Supreme court did not rule 1 bit on the merits. They did not declare anything a crime. They did not uphold any laws.

For emphasis - They did not reinstate any laws.

All they did was say "Hey 9th circuit, you cited bad reasons in making this decision - please rereview the case and make your decision for better reasons".

that's it. just kicked it back to dc circuit to be reviewed again.

Case is back in the 9th circuit again, and they will undoubtedly reach the same conclusion, just with different cited reasons - and all supreme court will have done is kick the can down the road and this case will be back at the supreme court next year where they have a chance to actually address the merits of the case.

8
flashersenpai 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is the answer. It was a review of the court procedure, not of the law or the specific case.

6
CentipedeDemon 6 points ago +6 / -0

TO THE TOP!

6
SemperFree 6 points ago +6 / -0

Doh. I should have read the article before getting excited.

6
jamesfinmadison 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, be careful of TGP. He's on our side, but isn't above misrepresenting things (intentionally or unintentionally).

Everything there must be double checked as he does this type of shit ALOT.