Keep your temper, press charges/contest fines/tickets, have your day in court. They are wrong. There are many ways to fight. We're right and we can win the right way.
If the supreme court strikes them down and they keep it up they're just trying to intimidate you/politick.
A minor correction to the title, this order strikes down the Health Secretary's draconian order, not the Governor's overall declaration. However, this was by far the most aggressive order the executive branch issued. Evers lacked the guts to issue this order himself, so he had the Health Secretary do it.
I'd like to see some LA people challenge this in Cali, but they'd just fucking spike it like they do with petitions. Gavin just fucking looks like he's got world class process server dodging skills - he's no Hunter Biden.
Yes but the majority opinions here were more broad, writing that the right to keep people sheltered is a limited time threat of immediate physical danger, not long-lasting removal of liberties.
They won't trample people for long if they go that route. The people have then outnumbered and out gunned by the thousands.
Keep your temper, press charges/contest fines/tickets, have your day in court. They are wrong. There are many ways to fight. We're right and we can win the right way.
If the supreme court strikes them down and they keep it up they're just trying to intimidate you/politick.
A minor correction to the title, this order strikes down the Health Secretary's draconian order, not the Governor's overall declaration. However, this was by far the most aggressive order the executive branch issued. Evers lacked the guts to issue this order himself, so he had the Health Secretary do it.
I'd like to see some LA people challenge this in Cali, but they'd just fucking spike it like they do with petitions. Gavin just fucking looks like he's got world class process server dodging skills - he's no Hunter Biden.
Also way to go WI
From what I've heard, Gavin Newsom has like 15 lawsuits filed against him. But the judges are dragging their feet.
Mark Dice replies on the thread and asks if the judges will be banned from twitter for violating their terms of service...most likely.
Yes but the majority opinions here were more broad, writing that the right to keep people sheltered is a limited time threat of immediate physical danger, not long-lasting removal of liberties.
Sadly there are multiple orders just the worst one is gone. So a few openings.
... and overruled based on process... not on its merits?
Correct. I read this to say they didn't follow the proper "rule making" procedures.
FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, BITCH !!!!!!!