Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
I very much so doubt it was one of the spooks. They're all greasy, but extremely savvy. They know damn well how the game works and the consequences of losing that game. Samantha Power is the outlier on that list, not a spy, not a spook, not a dug in bureaucrat, she was an ambassador. It's the nature of the position that her purpose is to further a political agenda for the relatively brief period she is in the position. She's the outlier, pure politician ignoramus.
Obviously we don't know yet, but I think the easy money is on Power.
He got fired and had his office cleaned out while he was speaking at some "diversity" event, and he had to get told not to show up to work by a television.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Admitting leaking is an interesting one too. Real big brain right there.
Just because he has so far got away with it, doesn't mean much. The syndicate has been set up carefully so a few bad shitapples don't spoil the rest. They are handled and told what to do, they all cover for each other, they they have prosecutors and judges, they have congressmen, they have the mainstream media.
A monkey with downs syndrome could have done the same.
Head of the FBI is unintelligent?? He was head of legal for Bridgewater, one of the biggest hedge funds in the world with $160B in assets, thats BILLIONS. GWB was the master at playing the idiot to deflect from noobs. Comey may go to GITMO but no one who reaches those high ranks lacks extreme intelligence. It's farcical to suggest otherwise
And btw Dick Cheney privatized the Iraq War via his former company, Halliburton, how much you think he made on that deal. Cheney is an evil genius at using tax payer money so he can be worth 9 figures
You assume it was ham-fisted incompetence when the more likely answer is she was doing it on purpose to cover her secret agreements for quid pro quo donations to the Clinton foundation. If she used government computers to sell influence she'd be caught red handed and it would only take one patriot in the state department, NSA or FBI to expose her. But if she did it on her personal servers then there's no paper trail and her buddies in Sr positions at the DOJ and FBI could give her a pass which they did
My bet is it wasn’t actually her and she allowed others to act on her behalf and this has come back to bite her harder than she ever expected. If you think about it there is evidence that she made hundreds of unmasking requests, no one with a real position of power would sign their name to this dumb shit action but a malicious pleb at the UN might. Or she really is that big of a dumb shit and it’s a good thing she is gone. Also why does someone at the UN have this kind of unfettered access to this kind of intelligence.
My bet is that it was her, but she was doing the unmasking for others (knowingly). Only just now have we been given proof that Obama and Biden themselves were doing unmaskings. So they had Powers do the unmasking for them and pass the data along, so that their hands weren't solely on it, while also trying to scrub that their hands were ever on it. They needed justifications for going after Trump, and if people like Obama and Biden and Lynch were the only ones doing the unmaskings, that would have made it all the easier to tell what was going on, and would have been a singular trail to follow. Instead, they had a ton of people do unmaskings to make it look like they were running legitimate intelligence/national security, rather than going after a political opponent.
Given the security checks in place, they can say with absolute certainty that Powers did make the request, and did get the information. But she was just a proxy to pass unmasking information along to others.
Wasn't it Admiral Rogers who talked about FBI "contractors" (Fusion GPS) submitting unmasking requests under Power's identity/account/whatever? It was why he immediately shutdown access to the info/system because he saw this abuse going on...
I don't think a court would accept "I have no recollection" when she was making the reqest every week and sometimes twice in a single week over a 6 week period. It's just not plausible for someone in her position to not recall that about such a key figure.
Bill Gates’ legal team developed the “I do not recall” defense during the antitrust investigation into Microsoft. I’m sure it’s been used before that in more limited scope, but the success of his defense was widely seen and since widely emulated. I don’t know a solution to it, but agree that it’s an issue.
She also said that some of her activities weren't hers.
She already fingered Obama (no, not like Biden) as him meeting in the loop. It is very plausible that she offered/allowed Obama to run those queries under her access credentials. Hmmmm
International ambassadors are the channels they utilize to tie foreign and domestic matters together. This creates a situation where both the SeeEyeEhh and EffBeeEye can now be "legally" utilized foreign and domestically. In Trumps particular situation....there were no real foreign ties to justify that sort of intelligence apparatus....even in our police state. So they had to manufacture their own ties through all the stupid shit we've seen over the past 3 years (Steele, Carter Page, FISA, etc.)
This is a really sad CYA from her that wouldn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny. These intelligence requests aren't like logging into Facebook for some info. You can't just share your credentials like that.
Actually it doesn't even need to go that far.... every question she lied to she started the answer with "I have no recollection of".... That's all you need to do to not be perjured....
Good thing though, Fitton got the opportunity to get Hillary live, under oath. Not sure when this happens but no more of the 'public story' telling us whatever she wants to in the media. Look at all of the IC people who had to say 'didn't see any russian collusion' under oath while spewing all of the 180 degrees opposite story in media. Need to get Schiff under oath.
I don’t know the process, but I wonder if someone else didn’t unmask “on her behalf”. My guess is that all of these insane liberals would do anything for Obama, including go fo jail for him.
Ultimately it's up to the question asker to call her out on that shit. She doesn't have to answer....but you'd ultimately get the real answer when they drop that stupid fucking line. Our legislators are fucking dunces though.
Q: Did you unmask General Flynn?
A: Hmmm. I have no recollection of doing that.
Q: So that's a no then?
A: I have no recollection of it.
Q: So it's possible but you don't know or can't remember?
A: I have no recollection.
Q: That answer doesn't apply to the question. It's either possible or not possible.
Yes. Because conspiracy theorist is a term made up by the CIA to mean crackpot. A conspiracy theory would be a theory of a conspiracy. A theory by nature requires some sort of evidence or circumstance for it to be posited in the first place, yet the CIA has you convinced it means conspiracy fantasy.
Weird how meanings of words change all the time. "Nationalist" becomes akin to Nazi. "Patriot Act" is the exact opposite. "White Supremacy" is a meritocracy. "Conspiracy theory" was the first.
If this was a Scooby-Doo episode, every time they would take a Samantha Power mask off the captured criminal there would be another Samantha Power mask until there was just Samantha Power.
I'm not concern trolling but, I need a pick-up.... I'm trying not to get excited but, in the light of the cucked judge Sullivan.... they are really trying to hit us on all sides, aren't they?
My bet is that Samantha Power is the one who leaked Flynn's call.
Joe's not smart enough. He just did it on the 12th so he wouldn't feel left out in the club.
Sad to say, you’re likely right, or some staffer just had him sign off on it to muddy the waters while keeping Obama himself off the list.
Obamas chief of staff even unmasked Flynn. There's your Obama connection. Chief of staff is not tasked with reviewing intelligence documents.
None of these folks are
I would not take that bet. I believe it too.
I'm thinking Comey. I think he needed the media for his new Logan Act push directive he got from Obama and that's why the FBI has not investigated it.
I very much so doubt it was one of the spooks. They're all greasy, but extremely savvy. They know damn well how the game works and the consequences of losing that game. Samantha Power is the outlier on that list, not a spy, not a spook, not a dug in bureaucrat, she was an ambassador. It's the nature of the position that her purpose is to further a political agenda for the relatively brief period she is in the position. She's the outlier, pure politician ignoramus.
Obviously we don't know yet, but I think the easy money is on Power.
The others may be cunning, but Comey really strikes me as a hapless simpleton.
I mean, maybe he's got me fooled because he's so good at playing one, but damn he acts a great pathetic, airhead, narcissistic loser.
He is not stupid or simple. He definitely has you fooled.
He is one of the slowest fuckers of the bunch.
He got fired and had his office cleaned out while he was speaking at some "diversity" event, and he had to get told not to show up to work by a television.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Admitting leaking is an interesting one too. Real big brain right there.
Just because he has so far got away with it, doesn't mean much. The syndicate has been set up carefully so a few bad shitapples don't spoil the rest. They are handled and told what to do, they all cover for each other, they they have prosecutors and judges, they have congressmen, they have the mainstream media.
A monkey with downs syndrome could have done the same.
Your understanding of the situation is simplistic and incorrect.
Watch some senate hearings with him. He’s crafty as fuck.
The senate hearings where he's "grilled" by fellow globalists with prearranged questions that he's rehearsed the answers to?
I think you're the one who's been dazzled by the flashing lights of this circus.
When you underestimate your enemy is when they are the most dangerous.
One of the worst mistakes you can make, right up there with over-estimating them.
Head of the FBI is unintelligent?? He was head of legal for Bridgewater, one of the biggest hedge funds in the world with $160B in assets, thats BILLIONS. GWB was the master at playing the idiot to deflect from noobs. Comey may go to GITMO but no one who reaches those high ranks lacks extreme intelligence. It's farcical to suggest otherwise
You think hrc email server was born out of incompetence? It was to avoid foia requests and allow foreign actors access to information.
And btw Dick Cheney privatized the Iraq War via his former company, Halliburton, how much you think he made on that deal. Cheney is an evil genius at using tax payer money so he can be worth 9 figures
You assume it was ham-fisted incompetence when the more likely answer is she was doing it on purpose to cover her secret agreements for quid pro quo donations to the Clinton foundation. If she used government computers to sell influence she'd be caught red handed and it would only take one patriot in the state department, NSA or FBI to expose her. But if she did it on her personal servers then there's no paper trail and her buddies in Sr positions at the DOJ and FBI could give her a pass which they did
My bet is it wasn’t actually her and she allowed others to act on her behalf and this has come back to bite her harder than she ever expected. If you think about it there is evidence that she made hundreds of unmasking requests, no one with a real position of power would sign their name to this dumb shit action but a malicious pleb at the UN might. Or she really is that big of a dumb shit and it’s a good thing she is gone. Also why does someone at the UN have this kind of unfettered access to this kind of intelligence.
My bet is that it was her, but she was doing the unmasking for others (knowingly). Only just now have we been given proof that Obama and Biden themselves were doing unmaskings. So they had Powers do the unmasking for them and pass the data along, so that their hands weren't solely on it, while also trying to scrub that their hands were ever on it. They needed justifications for going after Trump, and if people like Obama and Biden and Lynch were the only ones doing the unmaskings, that would have made it all the easier to tell what was going on, and would have been a singular trail to follow. Instead, they had a ton of people do unmaskings to make it look like they were running legitimate intelligence/national security, rather than going after a political opponent.
Given the security checks in place, they can say with absolute certainty that Powers did make the request, and did get the information. But she was just a proxy to pass unmasking information along to others.
Wasn't it Admiral Rogers who talked about FBI "contractors" (Fusion GPS) submitting unmasking requests under Power's identity/account/whatever? It was why he immediately shutdown access to the info/system because he saw this abuse going on...
Let me see if I can dig that info back up...
That's why they started the investigation. When he shut down the blanket spying, they created a fake investigation the very next day
Nope she said "I have no recollection" to every question she lied to... And therefore she didn't lie.
This is some bullshit that needs to change but currently that's all they have to do to get away with it.
I’d rather have her on sedition then lying anyway.
As long as it entails jail or a firing squad I’m good with it.
I don't think a court would accept "I have no recollection" when she was making the reqest every week and sometimes twice in a single week over a 6 week period. It's just not plausible for someone in her position to not recall that about such a key figure.
It also doesn't work when you sign your name on the evidence.
She's married to Cass Sunstein. She didn't ad-lib under oath.
Bill Gates’ legal team developed the “I do not recall” defense during the antitrust investigation into Microsoft. I’m sure it’s been used before that in more limited scope, but the success of his defense was widely seen and since widely emulated. I don’t know a solution to it, but agree that it’s an issue.
Seems lying to congress is meaningless seeing that Flynn was getting thrown in jail for a "process crime" with the FBI.
The reason why we are pissed and growing very impatient.
The leaders would be really wise to remember this and that Consent of the Governed matters.
Keep pushing. We don’t want this, but we will deliver.
ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!!!
It's meaningless unless you're Roger Stone.
She also said that some of her activities weren't hers.
She already fingered Obama (no, not like Biden) as him meeting in the loop. It is very plausible that she offered/allowed Obama to run those queries under her access credentials. Hmmmm
International ambassadors are the channels they utilize to tie foreign and domestic matters together. This creates a situation where both the SeeEyeEhh and EffBeeEye can now be "legally" utilized foreign and domestically. In Trumps particular situation....there were no real foreign ties to justify that sort of intelligence apparatus....even in our police state. So they had to manufacture their own ties through all the stupid shit we've seen over the past 3 years (Steele, Carter Page, FISA, etc.)
This is a really sad CYA from her that wouldn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny. These intelligence requests aren't like logging into Facebook for some info. You can't just share your credentials like that.
She didn’t try to unmask him, she succeeded in unmasking him. Therefore she didn’t lie, checkmate drumpf.
Actually it doesn't even need to go that far.... every question she lied to she started the answer with "I have no recollection of".... That's all you need to do to not be perjured....
Good thing though, Fitton got the opportunity to get Hillary live, under oath. Not sure when this happens but no more of the 'public story' telling us whatever she wants to in the media. Look at all of the IC people who had to say 'didn't see any russian collusion' under oath while spewing all of the 180 degrees opposite story in media. Need to get Schiff under oath.
I've never tried to hate Democrat Deep State Commies...but records show that I hate them viscerally.
Roll the original forms with their reasons for the request.
Grenell has been miles ahead of them this whole time. Remember he had the list last week. That satchel wasn't just carrying these three papers.
Page 37 of the Samantha Power Transcript. "I have no recollection of making a request related to General Flynn.
Liar liar pants on fire. Imagine a cop interviewing you about a murder and you tell them that. Case closed, he dindu nothing wrong. pack it up.
I wonder how this CNN analyst (Bakari?) was so informed on January 6th? One day after Obamas Chief of Staff unmasks.....makes you wonder. https://archive.org/details/CNNW_20170106_080000_CNN_Tonight_With_Don_Lemon/start/2940/end/3000
I don’t know the process, but I wonder if someone else didn’t unmask “on her behalf”. My guess is that all of these insane liberals would do anything for Obama, including go fo jail for him.
"I have no recollection"
And that's how they save their self every single time.
If you want to know what they're lying about just look at what answers begin with a statement like that.....
i DO not RECALL is another shyt distraction... FUCK THE dnc
Ultimately it's up to the question asker to call her out on that shit. She doesn't have to answer....but you'd ultimately get the real answer when they drop that stupid fucking line. Our legislators are fucking dunces though.
Q: Did you unmask General Flynn? A: Hmmm. I have no recollection of doing that. Q: So that's a no then? A: I have no recollection of it. Q: So it's possible but you don't know or can't remember? A: I have no recollection. Q: That answer doesn't apply to the question. It's either possible or not possible.
SamE time DNC/Hussein was pumping up ISIS
2014 1st I learned - any earlier?
Why was Samantha Powers, in the role of US ambassador to the United Nations, unmasking anyone?
So is Obamagate a "conspiracy theory" now?
At least there's tangible documented evidence. Much more than that supposedly "perfectly newsworthy" Russia fanfiction.
Yes. Because conspiracy theorist is a term made up by the CIA to mean crackpot. A conspiracy theory would be a theory of a conspiracy. A theory by nature requires some sort of evidence or circumstance for it to be posited in the first place, yet the CIA has you convinced it means conspiracy fantasy.
Weird how meanings of words change all the time. "Nationalist" becomes akin to Nazi. "Patriot Act" is the exact opposite. "White Supremacy" is a meritocracy. "Conspiracy theory" was the first.
THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU
to arrest this traitorous bitch.
You dont have to do this Joe
I feel like that could be considered a lie
Liers should pay
NASTY BITCH
Another whore of the DNC is caught... BEING A WHORE OF THE dnc.
Hang this bitch
It's so easy, she didn't even have to try... see, she was telling the truth! (liberal logic)
She's homely enough that some Yoda ears wouldn't look out of place.
"Do. Or do not. There is no try."
Man, it's amazing. His whole facking Administration has their hands all over this.
Valarie Jarrett- where's her name?
Clearly a repeated hippocampus malfunction.
She never TRIED, she just did it.
well obviously she forgot 7 times.. duh.
Why would the Treasury want Flynn unmasked?
Trace possible payments
Was any of it under oath?
Should be "Powers under oath: Never!" Not just claimed. Stated under oath.
She “never tried to” Lawyer speak
She might be truthful. Maybe some other deep swamper unmasked Flynn and used her name for cover.
Okay, so not to be a dick here or anything, but... how could she try to unmask anyone specific? Doesn't she have to unmask him to know who he was?
So what gives, Samantha?
Wonder how many did what was told by people with ties to China.
If this was a Scooby-Doo episode, every time they would take a Samantha Power mask off the captured criminal there would be another Samantha Power mask until there was just Samantha Power.
Might need to make that a two-part episode.
Hopefully Scrappy-Doo would be there too.
Yet nothing will happen to her
DNC: whores are immune!
Did these people not think the Trump admin wouldn’t see these records??
So she missed by a few. What difference does it make?
But she says she’s innocent ! Believe all women ! Yeah right......
Her and sally Yates are two cum rags I wanna see go down. Pieces of disgusting shit
hang
She meant that she didn't have to try. It was too easy.
I'm not concern trolling but, I need a pick-up.... I'm trying not to get excited but, in the light of the cucked judge Sullivan.... they are really trying to hit us on all sides, aren't they?
I’m sure it was an honest mistake. 🙄
It wasn't her. I believe her. Obama used her like a dummy corporation to mislead investigators and historians.
The real question is was Donald Trump unmasked and by who?
In the words of master Yoda, "Do or do not, there is no try."
A bull shit semantic argument, but you'll hear it from her lawyers at some point.
From zero to 7? Nah media. Move on, nothing to see here. NEXT!
Meaning it didn't take any actual effort to accomplish.