438
Comments (27)
sorted by:
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
16
Mrs_Fonebone 16 points ago +16 / -0

The alternative theory is that they targeted Flynn without bothering to get a FISA;Then, when it was clear Hillary was losing they had to cover their tracks and filed FISAs--and then claimed they legit picked up Flynn's name when they were doing routine surveillance on the Russia Sislyak. There was also nothing inappropriate in the call. So ironically, he was not unmasked because he was never really masked. Darker still.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Mrs_Fonebone 6 points ago +6 / -0

True, but apparently they thought more FISAs, more evidence of guilt--this is obviously a very hot spy connection Flynn had!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
MAGARondonmonson 10 points ago +10 / -0

Maybe, but I think they were BRAINSTORMING trying to come up with a charge to charge him with, hence all the Treasury people looking at the stuff. I also think this info was stuff the Brits gave us..........Remember this Headline?

British intelligence passed Trump associates' communications with Russians on to US counterparts By Jim Sciutto, Pamela Brown and Eric Bradner, CNN

Updated 12:49 AM ET, Fri April 14, 2017 Sources: UK intel uncovers Trump, Russia links

Hence when Flynn asked the Judge to make the Prosecution give them the TAPED CALL, they can rightly say, there is no Taped call !!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
MAGARondonmonson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to hang them all............Burr included.

7
rebelde_sin_causa 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm ok with arresting them all

6
Gmama2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Assume they all leaked, prosecute all of them.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
ShrikeDeCil 6 points ago +6 / -0

Unmasking also gives little things like "Where is he ... Now."

4
Trumper007 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thats why the PDB (president daily brief which contained the Flynn info) was directed to over 30 people. Usually goes to 2-3

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
neverreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok sorry for my ignorance but can someone explain something to me...

You’re looking at an intelligence report. It talks about a foreign national and an American- only the foreigner is named. You ask to have the name of that American “unmasked” so that you know who it is that’s talking to the foreign person under investigation. That much I understand.

So did they not know that the intel they were looking at was about Flynn? I just don’t understand. Were they unmasking tons of reports hoping to find Flynn? Or did they know it was Flynn all along and the unmasking served another purpose? I just don’t understand this process. If they had to unmask because they didn’t know who the American was then how were they targeting Flynn?

Thanks to whoever can understand whatever the hell im trying to say and can answer this question.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. My suspicion is they just needed to unmask the name first before they would be able to leak it. Then all the other unmaskings were to make more people complicit in the same crime, same way they bring people into their cabal.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
slangin_paint 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does that make it harder to ID the traitors? It just means there are more of them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

rico

3
jiujiujiu 3 points ago +3 / -0

One person is clear that needs to be arrested. The one guy that didn’t make a request. Obummer.

3
Afedupamerican 3 points ago +3 / -0

They were preparing for meetings. Samantha powers was coordinating it from the beginning.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TJac 2 points ago +3 / -1

Good call.Been wondering also.

2
Reddit2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo