2221
Comments (40)
sorted by:
29
saco 29 points ago +29 / -0

I heard that NYT tries to obfuscate the high position of conservative literature by adding some claim about bulk sales.

20
knightofday 20 points ago +20 / -0

Projection. That’s what liberals do to a T, bulk sales then preach about their “bestsellers”

16
Fredo_Cuomo 16 points ago +17 / -1

Of course no bulks sales reported with What Happened: I Was a Dogshit Candidate or Becoming: From Craig's Brother to Barack's Wife

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
6
1776-or-1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fun fact, to be a NYT bestseller you only have to sell 5k copies over a rolling 7 day window. Very low bar.

NYT isn't what it used to be.

5
RocketSurgeon22 5 points ago +5 / -0

I haven't read anything directly from NYT in a very long time.

15
workinating 15 points ago +15 / -0

Just read this aloud to my wife and it activated Google. Always listening.

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Activated google? What does that mean? Seriously can you explain.

7
nairebis 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's a joke (I hope). The wakeup phrase for Google voice is "Hey Google", and the article begins with that phrase.

2
TheMAGAnificent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like in transformers when the toaster transforms into a racist robot killer, same with our phones and TV's etc

1
workinating 1 point ago +1 / -0

Say "hey Google" near your phone. Activated and always listening.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
12
BannedbyRed 12 points ago +12 / -0

Found it pretty amusing that all the YouTube videos about Plandemic (can’t find the actual viseo anymore) are negative....

13
wompwomp 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
saco 6 points ago +6 / -0

It does exist on some less known video websites. I found it by going on Gab (a social media website) and searched for #plandemic.

8
Eatinglue 8 points ago +8 / -0

How credible is she? I mean the liberal internet has torn her a new one? I certainly agree with her assessment of research corruption in academia, you don’t keep the grant money flowing if your research doesn’t add up to the pre-conceived outcome. That law needs to be repealed.

8
jdg00 8 points ago +8 / -0

I dug into some of the studies they used to try and discredit her. The studies are more like just differing opinions and other Doctors have come to the same conclusions she has despite these people trying to act like she is just on an island by herself making these claims.I also saw that her peers seemed to respect her years ago way before any of this stuff came out.

3
JKillen 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did some digging too and it sounded like the mouse blood was thought to have contaminated samples of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Studies. Which they may have

I think what people are misisng may be don't quote me, is that mice viruses were making their way into our actual vaccine supply and XMRV was the thing found in mice that we were inadvertently poisoning people with.

I've even asked how much she says um and asked if that's an indicator of deception and Google it, studies show it's not.

Even if her study is discredited (which there is argument that was fuckery too, retraction means fake) she and Robert Kennedy Jr are both saying the same thing:

Bill Gates and Fauci and Vaccine Patents stand to make you trillions and they do more harm than good. I'm vaccinated most of us are but they are being linked to autism and all types of shit that just wasn't around when our grandparents were our age.

Check out Kennedy on Valutainment. Audio quality is rough but it's compelling to say the least.

2
DisgustedByMisleadia 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's not a law. It's just people getting what they paid for.

Grant money doesn't just come from the government.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +4 / -3

Q posted the video link didn't he?

1
RocketSurgeon22 1 point ago +3 / -2

It does not really matter. I found the link on Twitter. I believe many shared it, maybe Q as well.

4
SuperSilly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, now I know the whole story of the "Steisand Effect"!

3
Rickshawrick 3 points ago +3 / -0

at 25:20 Anthony Fauci 2017:

there's one message that I want to leave with you today is that there is no question that there will be a surprise outbreak ... the thing we are extraordinarily confident about is that we are going to see this in the next few years.

3
neverreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just ordered it. Thanks for the reminder.

1
banya 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaking of bulk sales. I've been thinking this would be a great way identify corruption. Bulk sales often used as a form of bribery to government officials and politicians. Anyone know if there is a source for such data?

1
JesusisKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

YES!

1
Aeronomer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. It appears that Leftists are usually pretty stupid.

1
FudgyFudgeBots 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Facebook meme contest will have the same effect. People searching for hateful memes are going to be swallowing a lot of red pills.

-2
Tenet -2 points ago +1 / -3

That documentary was part of the COVER UP - by hiding the legitimate information "it came from a Lab doing Gain of Function experiments in China, funded partly by the USA" to a bunch of bullshit anti-vaxxer nonsense.

You should know by now that outlets like Alex Jones and Anti-Vaxxer funded Documentaries are NOT your friends - even if they release one good story they bury it in dozens of stories of clowning, or hyperbolic screeching.

If I was working for the NSA/FBI, I would create a Clown to cover and delegitimize conspiracies. Hide the needle of truth in a haystack of bullshit.

Don't be Dumb - Remember, you represent the movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity. Your comments and posts may become news.

-7
DisgustedByMisleadia -7 points ago +2 / -9

Why are you posting an article from rt.com?

It's formerly "Russia Today", and is still funded by the Russian government. It's propaganda, not news.

You might as well be posting something from the Global Times (a Chinese propaganda site).

4
rootGoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's fine to point that out possible and likely bias - but linking to it isn't a problem.

The pedes here can make up their own minds about whether to read it, etc.

-3
DisgustedByMisleadia -3 points ago +1 / -4

If I hadn't posted a comment, how many pedes would have known it was Russian propaganda?

And, look at how many downvotes I've gotten for pointing out that it's a propaganda site. It looks like those pedes have made up their minds: Russian propaganda is OK as long as they agree with it.

2
dickwagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good article explaining the Streisand Effect and gives a few examples. Concluding that censorship is wrong, in any form or fashion.

Yeah, sounds terribly Russian to me.

-7
DisgustedByMisleadia -7 points ago +1 / -8

It hasn't occurred to you that Russia might have an ulterior motive?

Their goal is to stir up trouble in the US. And you are falling for it, hook, line, and sinker.

3
Datdevildawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Calm down killer. Article is straight forward and a good read on the current state of tech censorship.

Even cnn gets an article right once a year. I no longer watch ANY mainstream news not even Fox(stopped watching them back when they constantly shit all over Ron Paul in favor of Bush Jr). And cancelled cable. Now its only clips here and there to study up on an issue.

When I do watch news clips on a particular issue, I watch it all. Canadian, Australian, Russian, Polish, Brazilian, Italian. Shit I even watch Al Jazeera.

You have to find out the biases of every country's news outlets. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

2
Homopratensis1 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is extremely eye-opening. After you do it for a while and talk to norms that still watch US-TV and are plugged into their pipeline of half-lies you start to become very afraid of how stupid they all are. Any kind of democratic government devolves into a shitshow when the voting public is misinformed or uninformed.

-2
DisgustedByMisleadia -2 points ago +1 / -3

There are dozens of articles on the video, both pro and con, published in the US. There's no need to promote an article from a known foreign propaganda site.

Yeah, I know: CNN, NBC, CBS, etc. are US propaganda sites, too (see my username).