1006
Comments (18)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
brother_red 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, since the BOR originally DID only apply to the new Federal Government, and we all agree that the BOR is a good thing, why would you be against those protections extending down to the State level, especially for those States that restrict certain rights? (Cali/Guns...)

0
Oktheone 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't object to states securing these rights as well.

But if the people of the states chose to govern differently that's their choice. I E California could enforce strict gun laws, accordingly to what the California Constitution allows. They could ban guns altogether.