507
Comments (39)
sorted by:
20
grassshrimp 20 points ago +22 / -2

They should be able to own stocks like all of us, but must be managed by a blind trust.

7
residue69 7 points ago +7 / -0

As long as there's no communication between the elected official and the blind trust, just like with the political action committees. Oh, wait....

7
Dr_Falsey 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wouldn’t trust that the trust is blind.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
RocketSurgeon22 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blind trust means - you give the financial management team insider info, we will make money and make you money. However, because of the law, you must share info to us indirectly through specific contact.

3
Choomguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly how it works. How had is it to tell a staffer to tell the blind trustee that they should buy/sell a certain security? Not very.

2
RocketSurgeon22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Staffer sends text: I hear the Sorrento is very therapeutic for your health when driving to Mount Sinai.

3
I_LUV_WINNING 3 points ago +3 / -0

Although that sounds reasonable, i think if you are going to be a public servant you should get paid what your average citizen in your district gets paid, with the same average benefits and the same average lifestyle as your district, that will give any public servant consideration to make their districts better.

4
WinstonSmith1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've always been a fan of States paying their own Reps and Senators (and all staff) whatever they want. These should not be "federal" payroll positions.

11
Captricksky 11 points ago +11 / -0

You know .... they PASSED a law that said it is TOTALLY legal for them to participate with "Insider Trading." See its not illegal ..... because we said so!

3
WeCanMaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have since removed that law, but not until AFTER Nancy Pelosi cashed out and made her millions.

2
Captricksky 2 points ago +2 / -0

My bad .... thought it was still on the books.

7
Systemfree4 7 points ago +7 / -0

Rules for thee not for me .

6
BillGateCanSuckIt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Diane Feinstein has confirmed that she and her husband turned over documents regarding their stock trades ahead of the COVID-19 announcements. No word yet from Pelosi. Pelosi was notorious for such dealings and had refused to answer questions back in 2012.

5
InebriatedDaily 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right after Term Limits. Sure thing.

George Carlin: "It is a big fucking club and you and I ain't in it."

4
BillGateCanSuckIt 4 points ago +4 / -0

For a warrant to be served on a sitting US senator, this requires approval from the very highest ranks of the Justice Department. This signals that they are stepping up this investigation.

4
WinstonSmith1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is no reason they cannot own stocks. They are, however, supposed to be in a blind trust (managed by someone else) while they are in office

4
Marshall 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just make it illegal to accept any income from any source for the duration of your public service, either directly or indirectly except for salary. Reduce their office budget to same level as salary. Professional Lobbying should be criminalized.

1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who the hell would ever run?

3
JustInTime2_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Place it blind Trust.

2
Zadok 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS. A blind trust professionally managed over which the trustor has no control.

3
Aclothorsomething 3 points ago +3 / -0

Public service not public privilege.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DonaldJDrumpfenstein 2 points ago +2 / -0

At the very least should be blind trust like the lady from Georgia

2
ThePatriotGames2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

Frankly, all service members of the government should be treated as military boot camp, living in the dorm/barracks, on strict schedules, lights out and daily reveille with minimal payment.

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, and a lifetime ban on lobbying for all congress critters and their immediate families.

You shouldn't be going to congress to get rich. If that is your motivation, eff off, we don't need you.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
juice251974 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have black out periods just like they have for officers of public companies. Also they cant trade on insider information - just like CEO's of public companies. Once information is public then they can make the trade.

So make the laws, pass them, then you can trade just like the rest of us.

Hmm do you think they don't know the rules for everyone else?? Its a setup - they know they could just follow the same rules as public companies but they dont!

1
googurt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck that. Just make it all public record. If you are elected you have to disclose everything. It has to remain open. If you get caught doing some shady trades it makes it easy for the voter.

What really needs to happen is the end of this apathetic attitude toward house and senate reps. The average American gives no fucks what they do or even who they are.

1
ShitComment 1 point ago +1 / -0

Madame BallSackEyes

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
1NPC1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Andrew Yang actually had a good suggestion to stop insider trading in congress...I t was something like give them a raise but don't allow them to own stock or work for any corporations after like 8 years of serving their term.

1
Truglow 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should be put in stocks.