The fact I am a medical professional. There really is no other reason that being high risk of catching it and then spreading it. Same with the Hep B and Flu shot.
Obviously if it's like that shitty 2014 or 2017 batch of flu vaccine might as well not, but if it has at least 80% efficacy I'll be in that line like a good little soy boy.
i get it that people want to know what are in the vaccines before they inject them into their bodies. what i don't get is the hysterical mania against all forms of vaccination that i'm seeing from some people. do you want a resurgence of polio? 🤔
They cant and I will personally refuse to administer a vaccine against a person's express desire in that case. But there even now exist exemptions on religious and ideological grounds for vaccination.
We have immuno compromised people who SHOULDN'T be vaccinated, which is why I am GREATLY against the CDC's at birth recommendation for Hep B vaccination. Fucking test the kid first to see if it can even handle it.
But I never say never when it comes to places like Commiefornia.
I think we need to just stop treating it like a black and white issue.
Not all vaccines are created equal. Stifling conversation about vaccines isn't going to help people figure out what they think on the issue. It's just going to polarize peoples opinions.
The only reason the antivax "crap" is a thing, is because vaccine researchers and manufacturers are not transparent.
No it depends on the R0 of a virus. You can calculate it using a formula. Corona virus was at a R0 of 2 to 2.5 before the social distancing. If we used a 100% effective vaccine with half of the people immunized it wouldn't be possible for it to spread anymore because every other person you run into is immune.
So the target coverage for Wu Flu immunity is 50% of the population AT LEAST!
With measles you are dealing with an R0 of 12! That's why you need 90% coverage to stop measles. Because it is so virulent that you and the 12 people in the room will be infected instead of just the 1-2 other people with Wu Flu.
No, you have to take into account all the people who have already gotten it without significant symptoms and have antibodies already. They don't need to be vaccinated, but they won't get it or spread it.
A big no on that vaccine order.
thirded
4th.👀💀🔫
You don't need to get it. Just 50% of the population = herd immunity for Wu Flu.
So let all the Dims get their mandatory vaccines and BOOM! You're now "herd immune".
PS: I will be getting the vaccine voluntarily
The fact I am a medical professional. There really is no other reason that being high risk of catching it and then spreading it. Same with the Hep B and Flu shot.
Obviously if it's like that shitty 2014 or 2017 batch of flu vaccine might as well not, but if it has at least 80% efficacy I'll be in that line like a good little soy boy.
Plus I bet your job will require it unless there is a contraindication.
how do you know if a flu batch is good or not until after the fact?
You say you're a medical professional but think that herd immunity is only 50 percent of the population? Yeah, sure ok
i get it that people want to know what are in the vaccines before they inject them into their bodies. what i don't get is the hysterical mania against all forms of vaccination that i'm seeing from some people. do you want a resurgence of polio? 🤔
That won't work for me .. I avoid democrats like the plague.
They cant and I will personally refuse to administer a vaccine against a person's express desire in that case. But there even now exist exemptions on religious and ideological grounds for vaccination.
We have immuno compromised people who SHOULDN'T be vaccinated, which is why I am GREATLY against the CDC's at birth recommendation for Hep B vaccination. Fucking test the kid first to see if it can even handle it.
But I never say never when it comes to places like Commiefornia.
You don't administer vaccines anyway
Tell me why you will be getting the vaccine voluntarily?
I am not anti-vax and we typically get our vaccines, but I am curious why you will trust one rapidly developed?
We never bother with flu shots, but all the other stuff we do get.
I answered in another post, work in the medical field. I don't want to risk getting it nor be a vector for spread.
I don't like the flu shots either but I still get em just in the chance they aren't crap this year and I can protect patients from spreading it to em.
I think we need to just stop treating it like a black and white issue.
Not all vaccines are created equal. Stifling conversation about vaccines isn't going to help people figure out what they think on the issue. It's just going to polarize peoples opinions.
The only reason the antivax "crap" is a thing, is because vaccine researchers and manufacturers are not transparent.
The reason antivaxxers exist is because they are retarded
Skepticism of a medicine is not being anti-vaxx.
No it depends on the R0 of a virus. You can calculate it using a formula. Corona virus was at a R0 of 2 to 2.5 before the social distancing. If we used a 100% effective vaccine with half of the people immunized it wouldn't be possible for it to spread anymore because every other person you run into is immune.
So the target coverage for Wu Flu immunity is 50% of the population AT LEAST!
With measles you are dealing with an R0 of 12! That's why you need 90% coverage to stop measles. Because it is so virulent that you and the 12 people in the room will be infected instead of just the 1-2 other people with Wu Flu.
No, you have to take into account all the people who have already gotten it without significant symptoms and have antibodies already. They don't need to be vaccinated, but they won't get it or spread it.
Exactly.
If he can get a non-Bill Gates affiliated vaccine in the works, he'd get A LOT more takers.
Make that a FUCK no for me, please.
It says vaccine development? Maybe their scientist are contributing information? I don't see this as we're ordering from them