To be fair, they aren't arguing that she is the rightful president, only that she should be, and that the electoral college is undemocratic, which it is. Especially since small states have a huge advantage, not only in the senate, but also in the house after the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929. For example, red Texas has 1 rep per 850,000 people vs 1 rep for only 600,000 in Vermont. These tiny blue states in the northeast have such an advantage because of the electoral college.
The rules haven't changed. Hate the player, but don't hate the game.
You have to win states, and if they know you've never voted due to a guy at the DMV getting a huge promotion for handing those records over to the DNC, they know whose votes to steal. Voter disenfranchisement is the name of the game.
Well they still argue she won the popular. Too bad that’s not how our elections are decided. Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.
To be fair, they aren't arguing that she is the rightful president, only that she should be, and that the electoral college is undemocratic, which it is. Especially since small states have a huge advantage, not only in the senate, but also in the house after the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929. For example, red Texas has 1 rep per 850,000 people vs 1 rep for only 600,000 in Vermont. These tiny blue states in the northeast have such an advantage because of the electoral college.
The rules haven't changed. Hate the player, but don't hate the game.
You have to win states, and if they know you've never voted due to a guy at the DMV getting a huge promotion for handing those records over to the DNC, they know whose votes to steal. Voter disenfranchisement is the name of the game.
If Biden wins, boys, that's treason personified.
The rules changed in 1929. If apportionment kept up, Texas would have 102 representatives instead of 36 and 104 electoral votes instead of 38.