35
Comments (19)
sorted by:
7
Ghostphaez 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Trust the flan".

3
FamburgerHelper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mmmmm .... flan.

5
Pres_Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

From what I heard, cant remember if it was from Bongingo or Gorka, but there is another Prosecutor that was just brought on to deal with Obama/Biden. So, yes its not Durham.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Debutante 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate to be the one to rain on your parade, but I am beginning to think that they are just so terrifed of upsetting Obama supporters that they are going to let him get away with it. What bothers me is this -- NOBODY cares if WE get upset because they know we will just sit patiently while they tick tock us to death till the cows come home.

I wouldn't be this angry if I hadn't tried to red pill so many people and now ended up looking like a total fool. Any way you look at it Barr took the teeth out of "Obamagate" . And I am sorry, but I can't convince anyone if all that's left is the gums.

3
canadianhere 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually he said based on the work that Durham was doing, he didn't expect it would point to Obama/Biden.

But it's unspoken afterward, and you can almost hear it: "But if it does..."

3
Factsherrt 3 points ago +3 / -0

“As to President Obama and Biden, whatever their level of involvement, based on the information I have today, I don’t expect Mr. Durham’s work will lead to a criminal investigation of either man. Our concern of potential criminality is focused on other individuals

information has only started to come out rest of the information is to come over the next few weeks.

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cognitive Dissonance on your part?

1
sineater 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shhh. Something something 4D chess

1
Proud_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe I’m mistaken, but based on what I heard it can be argued that Trump could abuse the power of the office and it wouldn’t be a federal crime.

Barr spelled out a ‘two wrongs don’t make a right’ case for why an investigation into Biden or Obama will not be taken to task. This opens the door to avoiding prosecution for malfeasance if your willing to abuse a position of power.

Thus, Trump should do exactly What Obama and his cronies did because the expectation is there would be no repercussions.

2
Donkeyballs 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s all about language. The door is open.

1
Deepstatesucks 1 point ago +2 / -1

The most I bet you would get would be an Unindicted co-conspirator tag. If you start throwing presidents or candidates in jail It becomes argentina. Throw everyone else in jail. That’s how they attacked trump. Deny them their inner circle and make the association too costly

4
prodigal 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have to disagree. What deterrent would anyone have NOT to abuse the office if it comes with "above the law" status? Presidents are just people and if they commit crimes they need to be held accountable.

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

His statement that findings of wrongdoings not necessarily being federal crimes is the kicker.

Shouldn’t Trump just go ahead and “abuse” the position?

Anyone with the moral fortitude to uphold the oath of office is at a disadvantage based on the structure we have seen.

1
Deepstatesucks 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a world where the power to power to prosecute was held by those interested in justice and not driven by political ideology that would be correct.

When AG’s started being wingman to the president that was ended. Now they see politics in everything Barr does because they abused the system they figure we do it to. For them to think otherwise they would have to admit their corruption. They won’t do that.

When you think that your guy is hailed for his views then you see armed insurrection and war in the street. I have lived in Latin America through 3 coops. Ain’t fun. We don’t need it here.

Burn everyone south of the candidate

1
prodigal 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a world where the power to power to prosecute was held by those interested in justice and not driven by political ideology that would be correct.

exactly the point. This is what we want addressed. It has to be addressed or he IS doing what they do- covering for the swamp. If those fiascoes are never addressed it perpetuates the fundamental betrayal of the People. Corrupt Justice is no Justice at all. Govt is going to have to earn back the place of respect and public trust or it all goes sideways. People have had enough.

0
Pres_Trump 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yeh, I am on the fence with whether Obama should be brought down for this.

1
NvCrone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember when Corney told GEOTUS he was not the target?

0
inquimouse 0 points ago +1 / -1

Or, Durham isn't doing it now, or, Obama will be on the hook for something else, or, catch me after Nov. 3 when I have more flexibility, or, new term, new AG.