Sydney is way ahead of that. You need to read her submission from January of this year. It is document number 160 in the docket
Don't let the 200+ page count scare you. The argument itself is only 40 or 50 pages - the rest is supporting documentation, which you can skip.
The problem that Sullivan is trying to solve is that the court record does not include enough facts for a guilty plea, and neither the prosecution nor the defense are willing to attempt to establish them. So, the extra judge is coming in, which is very irregular, and he wants to assert new facts from the bench, which is far beyond irregular and deep into "Bro, do you even judge?" territory.
Sydney is way ahead of that. You need to read her submission from January of this year. It is document number 160 in the docket
Don't let the 200+ page count scare you. The argument itself is only 40 or 50 pages - the rest is supporting documentation, which you can skip.
The problem that Sullivan is trying to solve is that the court record does not include enough facts for a guilty plea, and neither the prosecution nor the defense are willing to attempt to establish them. So, the extra judge is coming in, which is very irregular, and he wants to assert new facts from the bench, which is far beyond irregular and deep into "Bro, do you even judge?" territory.
Bro but like...He is trying to charge contempt over a basic process....
Like that's it, it's over. Judicial misconduct, you blew it. Throw the case out. Hang the faggot judge let's move on.
Faggots are actually indeed to be burned