This is exactly the thing that people will come at you and call an anti-vaxxer for stating. Which is dumb as hell, since it's literally THE scientific position.
there has not been any double blind placebo studies on vaccine safety with a true control group of unvaccinated subjects.
This could be easily remedied. Take the inert components of the vaccine and do a double blind study. The only response (which may be present with the placebo) should be systemic inflammatory/fever, which is how the body reacts to anything it perceives as a threat.
A different group could be done each year, and longitudinal studies done to see if there are long term effects. The one big problem in a long term study would be finding people who don't normally get vaccines and haven't had them before, that are willing to do the testing and receive the placebo/inert vaccine. Essentially, you would need enough life long anti-vaxxers willing to get a vaccine to prove whether vaccine components are dangerous.
I know it's a hard red pill to swallow, but the science on vaccines is similar except that it's much worse.
Pharma is not legally liable for any vaccine injury, you can't sue them.
the vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) has awarded $4B in vaccine injury payouts. Who pays into this program? The vaccinated.
there has not been any double blind placebo studies on vaccine safety with a true control group of unvaccinated subjects.
there has not been any studies done on the effects of taking multiple vaccines together.
I'm not anti vaccine I'm pro safe vaccine I just want to point out more of the corruption in science, it's everywhere; see global warming science.
This is exactly the thing that people will come at you and call an anti-vaxxer for stating. Which is dumb as hell, since it's literally THE scientific position.
Things like water treatment and plumbing were the biggest factors in eradicating diseases.
I’m not anti vaccination either... but critical thinking requires we see a difference between the Polio Vaccine and the Flu Shot.
The former is effective... the latter a crap shoot.
This could be
easilyremedied. Take the inert components of the vaccine and do a double blind study. The only response (which may be present with the placebo) should be systemic inflammatory/fever, which is how the body reacts to anything it perceives as a threat.A different group could be done each year, and longitudinal studies done to see if there are long term effects. The one big problem in a long term study would be finding people who don't normally get vaccines and haven't had them before, that are willing to do the testing and receive the placebo/inert vaccine. Essentially, you would need enough life long anti-vaxxers willing to get a vaccine to prove whether vaccine components are dangerous.