Really? We see over and over again that patients who have a vaccine are literally immune to the disease, or at least that strain, in medicine. You think that won't stop the spread of the disease?
It's a huge rabbit hole, far too lengthy for this medium of exchange, but if you're genuinely interested and would like your world view thoroughly challenged, I can start you in that direction.
Those in a dark age probably dont know they're in one.
Much like how modern scientific consensus on a variety of subjects has a few bad actors propping up psuedo-scientific axioms to maintain it as proper "science" ala "manmade global warming," germ theory has it's own axiomatic problems. The core premises sound logical and trick you into taking them for granted. Many have done so and an entirely false paradigm developed around it, but those premises truly have not been vetted with the certainty that we expect of "Science".
What are you told about the Flu vaccine's effectiveness? Too many different strains? Would it really be that surprising to find out it simply doesnt work? Occam's Razor?
Germ theory is actually highly contentious in its scientific sphere, but you will not hear about this via mainstream sources.
Here's a "correlation" you can investigate that illustrates this point indirectly. Connect the dots and take a step back and you'll see what I'm talking about here:
DDT
Polio
EDIT: Mainstream media has proven a thousands times over that they are an enemy of the people (that's why were all here!). Do you believe that said media only attempts to manipulate you within a specific range or window? Only about en vogue controversy such as racism, sexism, Trump?
All that to say that you should be highly suspicious of this same media's longstanding and unwavering support of vaccines. They dont even entertain "anti-vax" sentiment. As far as the likes of CNN is concerned, that's always been the realm of unsubstantiated "conspiracy theory". I honestly think that should be enough for you dive head first into the deep end of the other side of the discussion, but that's just me and my personal intuition talking.
Immunity to one disease at the higher risk of another is not a goal of anyone other than those selling the vaccine. The Hippocratic Oath says, first do no harm. It has been replaced with the Hypocritical Oath that says fool the public through fear and then depopulate the Earth through intentionally unsafe and harmful vaccines.
There is also very little legitimate proof of vaccines eliminating widespread infectious disease.
It is merely circumstantial, a correlation taken for granted by mainstream science.
It is an incontrovertible fact that most of these diseases were on radical decline well before our beloved vaccines were ever in significant use.
Really? We see over and over again that patients who have a vaccine are literally immune to the disease, or at least that strain, in medicine. You think that won't stop the spread of the disease?
It's a huge rabbit hole, far too lengthy for this medium of exchange, but if you're genuinely interested and would like your world view thoroughly challenged, I can start you in that direction.
Those in a dark age probably dont know they're in one.
Much like how modern scientific consensus on a variety of subjects has a few bad actors propping up psuedo-scientific axioms to maintain it as proper "science" ala "manmade global warming," germ theory has it's own axiomatic problems. The core premises sound logical and trick you into taking them for granted. Many have done so and an entirely false paradigm developed around it, but those premises truly have not been vetted with the certainty that we expect of "Science".
What are you told about the Flu vaccine's effectiveness? Too many different strains? Would it really be that surprising to find out it simply doesnt work? Occam's Razor?
Germ theory is actually highly contentious in its scientific sphere, but you will not hear about this via mainstream sources.
Here's a "correlation" you can investigate that illustrates this point indirectly. Connect the dots and take a step back and you'll see what I'm talking about here:
DDT
Polio
EDIT: Mainstream media has proven a thousands times over that they are an enemy of the people (that's why were all here!). Do you believe that said media only attempts to manipulate you within a specific range or window? Only about en vogue controversy such as racism, sexism, Trump?
All that to say that you should be highly suspicious of this same media's longstanding and unwavering support of vaccines. They dont even entertain "anti-vax" sentiment. As far as the likes of CNN is concerned, that's always been the realm of unsubstantiated "conspiracy theory". I honestly think that should be enough for you dive head first into the deep end of the other side of the discussion, but that's just me and my personal intuition talking.
Immunity to one disease at the higher risk of another is not a goal of anyone other than those selling the vaccine. The Hippocratic Oath says, first do no harm. It has been replaced with the Hypocritical Oath that says fool the public through fear and then depopulate the Earth through intentionally unsafe and harmful vaccines.