2148
Comments (130)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
MW23232 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is not the original article I had. The original article was not on Brietbart. I am still trying to rescue the original article and study from my stuck "sticky notes". This is similar, I think. I don't like to use Brietbart as a source, only because it is known to be pro-conservative, maybe not as likely to be believed as some other source, but it is difficult to find anything on a "google" search these days, and it does have the Virology report within it, so I am sending these for now. Be sure to look at the links within the articles as they lead tothe actual studies and who did them:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/19/chloroquine-known-as-effective-against-coronavirus-since-2005/

Here is the study from article: https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

This is another link off of above brietbart article: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/18/malarial-drug-chloroquine-effective-against-coronavirus/

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +3 / -1

Thank you, I will look through those.

1
MW23232 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are welcome. I really wish I had the original article and study. I trusted that one more than just taking this off Brietbart and no way to compare if it is at least the same study. I thought the other one was safe where I put it, and it obviously wasn't.