3886
Comments (268)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
I_Love_45-70_Gov 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'd like to see Sidney's brief now. It must be packed with spicy jabs at that commie Sullivan.

17
13
nero2003 13 points ago +13 / -0

Damn. She DESTROYS Sullivan. Just DESTROYS him. I'm an attorney and this situation is shocking.

4
_ra247 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s nice to hear from an attorney. My lay-person read was similar and I’m very proud of Sidney and Mike.

And inside baseball that you found particularly shocking? How often do you see writs of mandamus?

Edit: also Sullivan just scheduled oral arguments for all of this amicus brief bullshit for July 16. How does that affect the writ of mandamus?

4
nero2003 4 points ago +4 / -0

A writ of mandamus against a judge is very rare. It's only used when he's clearly doing something extremely far outside what is right and normal.

The scheduling order doesn't mean much. He will put it on hold if the Appeals Court acts, which it very likely will. And since it was an emergency motion, they should be acting pretty quick. They'll probably order briefing in the next day or two.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
nero2003 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's no "legal" format, but there are style guides. Case citations are pretty universal. The most common style guide is called the Bluebook. Footnotes can be more free-form.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
chuckachookah 3 points ago +4 / -1

A Judicial Freedom Boner... a rare find.

4
I_Love_45-70_Gov 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you very much, Pede.

3
Zytos 3 points ago +4 / -1

What font is this exactly.

3
isitpedanticenough 3 points ago +3 / -0

Georgia, 14 pt. lol

3
malthrax 3 points ago +3 / -0

14pt Georgia, like it says at the end of the document

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

From the last page where you have to actually list it: 14-point Georgia

13
4
I_Love_45-70_Gov 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you. Hadn't thought she would post it, much less, even had her own website.

2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nor was this the end of the matter. The district judge’s latest actions—failing to grant the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, appointing a biased and highly-political amicus who has expressed hostility and disdain towards the Justice Department’s decision to dismiss the prosecution, and the promiseto set a briefing schedule for widespread amicus participation in further proceedings—bespeaksa judge who is not only biased against Petitioner, but also revels in the notoriety he has created by failing to take the simple step of granting a motion he has no authority to deny. This is an umpire who has decided to steal public attention from the playersand focus it on himself. He wants to pitch,bat, run bases,and play shortstop. In truth, he is way out in left field.

1
I_Love_45-70_Gov 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know it's a serious argument once baseball analogies are put in play.

Gotta love Mrs. Powell. Oh, and thanks, Pede.

2
Long_time_lurker 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is. Dear God, it's spicy. She got everything except the CYA memo being declassified, which happened after she had submitted it.

It's very passionately written. Not the usual style for legal briefs but you can feel the frustration from it.

isitpedanticenough has already replied to you with a link.