3886
Comments (268)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
preferredfault 8 points ago +9 / -1

The closest precedent is for situations like when a woman tries to drop charges against an abusive husband/boyfriend, and the state decides to prosecute anyways. Except even in this case, the state, i.e. the federal government, has dropped the charges. Sullivan will lose in the end, but he's going to try every dirty trick he can to extend Flynn's suffering. This isn't about justice, it's about spite, it always was.

What makes it even more egregious is the fact that with all the information recently released about how the FBI agents were operating, even if they could try to prosecute the case, they would never win. The judge doesn't care about this information, because he's in on it. He's playing the part he was meant to play long before Flynn got framed. Sullivan wasn't a random judge, he was chosen specifically because they knew he was corrupt.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
flashersenpai 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think this is the actual situation. This is why people don't report crimes in some cases because they'd rather not involve the police and all the issues/disruption in life that can cause for them personally or those around them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0