Supreme Court literally ruled on this last week 9-0, and it was RBJ herself that literally wrote the courts opinion that Amici briefs used like this are bullshit.
It's just a sad fact of life people don't always show their true colours until they do such as murder cases where the murderer seemed perfectly normal until they weren't and no one expected it or could believe it.
Pretty sure his "amicus" is close to some of Mueller's team. Based on the "treason" comments, I'm pretty sure his head is deep up the ass of some cuck conspiracy theories like those on redacted.
No. There is no precedence for this.
Judges are not of the Dredd variety. If there is no one bringing a criminal complaint then there is nothing to adjudicate.
It is not an exaggeration to suggest that this judge is acting completely outside of his authority.
It 100% is. SCOTUS even in current form would likely rule 9-0 that it's an abuse of separation of powers.
Wow, if even RBG rules against you, you done fucked up good!
Supreme Court literally ruled on this last week 9-0, and it was RBJ herself that literally wrote the courts opinion that Amici briefs used like this are bullshit.
Or you're an unborn baby.
In fact they did pretty much that just over a week ago, which I'm sure is what you're referencing.
Expect it to be more like 5-4 if Flynn goes before them because of TDS, though.
It's just a sad fact of life people don't always show their true colours until they do such as murder cases where the murderer seemed perfectly normal until they weren't and no one expected it or could believe it.
Where or what is the dirt on Sullivan?
Someone has their heavy thumb on Sullivan's scale of fair justice, IMHO.
he got his son rape and beating charges dismissed
Pretty sure his "amicus" is close to some of Mueller's team. Based on the "treason" comments, I'm pretty sure his head is deep up the ass of some cuck conspiracy theories like those on redacted.