Neither do we, the judge has gone completely off the rails here.

The basic answer is that he didn't like that the DoJ dropped the prosecution due to prosecutorial misconduct, so he appointed his own prosecutor under the guise of an "amicus" to take over the state's role. Said "amicus" has already publicly declared Flynn guilty in an op-ed in a major paper. The court, as well, has called Flynn a "traitor" in open court, something in no way supported by any of the accusations against him.

He should absolutely be censured for abuse of discretion when they decide on this writ, but only in a just world if we draw a just judge to review this instead of someone biased.