74
posted ago by bellcurvestrikesback +74 / -0

The strange nature of these dystopian policies unfolding without any delay or dissent is reminiscent of the thousand page Patriot Act passed in under three weeks twenty years ago and the stripping away a large part of our civil liberties.

I always trusted the basic gist of the official story of 9/11 but this recent coordinated govt response that seems to have an ulterior motive other than public health (and that some term the "plandemic" to allude to that) has been making me consider that maybe there was some level of foreknowledge or even orchestration to both events, and that this is just a continuation of that.

Has anyone else thought about this, or went back and reexamined their knowledge of the events of Sept 11 over the last couple months?

Comments (53)
sorted by:
13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
4
rebelde_sin_causa 4 points ago +4 / -0

The same people tried to goad GEOTUS into a war with Iran

but he is too nimble for them

3
One_Man_Militia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well said!

1
congruent 1 point ago +2 / -1

I am like the only person that believes there were WMD's. For the simple reason of: why would Hussein (Sadaam, not Barack) get rid of them? He has no motive to do that. He would have kept them unless they were forced out of his hand. So they were there. It's the only thing that makes sense.

6
ADAM_SCHITT 6 points ago +6 / -0

He had some chemical weapona but thats about it. And they were old and shitty and no threat to the USA.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Mr_Pink 1 point ago +2 / -1

One theory is that he buried them in the desert. Iraq has lots of that. It would be almost impossible to confirm either way.

1
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The MSM is conflating some old sarin and nerve gases with what the public pictures when WMD's is mentioned, which is nuclear weapons. Noone cares about some rusty barrels of chlorine gas.

13
Harambe 13 points ago +15 / -2

Building 7

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
johnbillaby 1 point ago +2 / -1

A giant skyscraper fell on it and then it burned without sprinklers or fire fighters for many hours.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
johnbillaby 0 points ago +1 / -1

The entire building was on fire with nobody fighting the fires because they were dead under the other buildings. When has that ever happened in the history of large buildings?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
johnbillaby 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh man, that means the US government and millions of US citizens all knew about this big plot to have a fake terrorist attack and they kept it a secret all these years. I bet the people on the planes were fake too.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
johnbillaby -1 points ago +1 / -2

The entire building was on fire and a large chunk of the enormous skyscraper hit it. Then it fell because the fires burned all day without anyone trying to put them out.

1
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's possible but I find it strange no other steel skycrapers throughout history that underwent extensive fires collapsed

1
johnbillaby 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which skyscraper fires went without any sprinklers or firefighters for a whole day?

4
ohwell316 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is the only answer.

9
sustainable_saltmine 9 points ago +9 / -0

dont like the naked body scans at TSA checkpoints? get ready for temperature checks, "immunity passports" and less seats at airport terminals and higher prices for tickets due to seats being ripped out to allow more "social distancing" and because the airlines wanting to recover massive losses during all this.
we gave up rights for security after 9/11 now we will end up doing it again for a benign virus

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
0
johnbillaby 0 points ago +1 / -1

There wasn't enough destruction, they felt they had to knock down a smaller building that nobody cared about many hours later just to make the conspiracy work out or something.

8
DonnieRamesJio 8 points ago +8 / -0

, OKC bombing, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Iran Hostage Crisis, Energy Crisis, Watergate, Gulf of Tonkin, WW2, WW1. Gone back and questioned opinion on just a couple of things

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
Saltsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did we even win WWII? We brought Nazis into sci nice and intel then deep state ok over and here we are.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
sustainable_saltmine 7 points ago +8 / -1

"jet fuel doesnt melt steel beams"
it burns plenty hot enough to weaken them to the point they cant hold the weight above them.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
ForHumans 4 points ago +4 / -0

and collapse at free-fall speed into itself

3
Mr_Pink 3 points ago +3 / -0

True regarding the softening of steel at those temperatures, but there is plenty more to consider. For example, the black smoke indicating incomplete combustion and lower temperatures. More importantly, if the failure of said beams led to a progressive collapse of the floors as they separated from the core, why did the core also fall? And why did it fall straight down into itself at freefall speeds? And where is the rubble?

The whole thing stinks in so so many ways.

6
knightofday 6 points ago +6 / -0

I actually just had the 9/11 talk with someone a week ago, we’re both convinced without a shadow of a doubt that the deep state either knew it was coming and turned a blind eye, organized it, or a combination of both.

The official story is 1000% bullshit on its face knowing what we know now about soo much other fuckery and lies.

6
rebelde_sin_causa 6 points ago +6 / -0

After the Russia Hoax which is a 100% proven hoax, one wonders if the deep state does anything besides spin hoaxes to expand their power

The thing all their hoaxes have in common is that they are based on real events that actually happened. So that people have a hard time calling it an outright lie.

Except the Gulf of Tonkin incident. There weren't any real events there. That was a complete lie all the way.

5
ForHumans 5 points ago +9 / -4

I figured most of us here are truther nutjobs

10
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 10 points ago +11 / -1

We are living in strange times. At some level, who's the conspiracy theorist?

Are people who think Epstein jumped five feet off a top bunk with braided toilet paper around his neck and broke his neck (at the same time the cameras malfunctioned) the nutjobs, or is it those who feel he was murdered to stop him from incriminating others?

9
Freedom_Feels_Good 9 points ago +10 / -1

August 10, 2019: the day Jeffrey Epstein died, and everyone in America became a conspiracy theorist.

3
FooLyCooLie 3 points ago +5 / -2

Well said.

2
NecturusMaculosus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I prefer the term "freethinkers"

4
Songofsixpence 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lots of things have bothered me for a very long time. WikiLeaks when they first came out with stuff was a huge eye opener. I always only wanted the truth, come what may. There is a documentary on YouTube called "Everything is a Rich Man's Trick". It covers from WWI through JFK up to 9/11. This really helped me put it all together.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

^^^ implying a US president would ever be impeached for real reasons like war crimes, rather than political things like phone calls

LMAO

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
farangbak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately, yes. It sickens me to question it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Songofsixpence 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lots of things have bothered me for a very long time. WikiLeaks when they first came out with stuff was a huge eye opener. I always only wanted the truth, come what may. There is a documentary on YouTube called "Everything is a Rich Man's Trick". It covers from WWI through JFK up to 9/11. This really helped me put it all together.

1
Aedenwolf187 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes.