1464
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-8
TrumpKnowsKungFu -8 points ago +5 / -13

Cursory searches are showing all three of these points to be false. Also, you cited an instagram image as a source :(

9
powershellder 9 points ago +10 / -1

He has links to sources on his website: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/

Care to provide the evidence you saw that these claims are “false”?

-2
TrumpKnowsKungFu -2 points ago +2 / -4

I actually don't. The 'source' is a highly biased individual. who is neither a scientist nor a statician. On the other end of the spectrum, there's a TON of debunks, but almost all are SIMILARLY highly politicized, so I don't really care to post them. I'll be goddamned to put snopes on here, anyway.

I do see some things, like the rise in Indian polio arising from a single study, that was later countered and pointed out it was a statistical confirmation bias issue, not a Gates foundation problem.

That said, I don't care to defend Bill Gates, so I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Feel free to believe Robert F Kennedy Jr. Also, it's bad karma to disagree with conspiracy theories here.

Edit - I did find ONE reasonable source IRT Gates Polio - https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?op=1

6
ChickNorris 6 points ago +6 / -0

karma karma or fake internet points karma? Just wondering bc I would wager 99% of us here don't care about fake internet points karma and if you do then you should rethink that.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
-11
deleted -11 points ago +2 / -13
-3
TrumpKnowsKungFu -3 points ago +2 / -5

Go with the flow, man, or the rocks start flying

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6