It's sad, but some dudes just have no restraint and end up simping, then they prop up these young women and it creates a shitty situation for everyone. Twitch used to just be a gaming site and now it's a festering shitscape of thots and their legions of pay piggies that cause all kinds of changes and ruin it for the rest of us. Youtube is the same way, shit all of social media really.
If someone is not interfering with your or anyone else's health, property, or liberty let them live their lives. I think the guy that sent photos to the dads is a tool. Who died and made him the moral police? Do onto others, the golden rule, do you want someone sending your dad things you do that he would disapprove of?
That's a slippery slope. When laws are not being broken, and no one is doing anything against their own will, who decides what is classified as correct and holy and what falls into "darkest and scummiest places"?
I worry that is a flip-side liberal thought. "I'm right; your wrong. Reee."
But yeah if you are ashamed of your actions in private and are afraid of the sun then maybe you should rethink your actions.
Personal responsibility is a two-way street. If some dumbasses are paying these women a lot of money for whatever reason, that's their problem.
Yes, the women are preying on them. Yes they're stupid to part with their money. Plenty of blame to go around--but ignoring one side while admonishing the other goes completely counter to the tenants of individual responsibility.
"Modern day dating created simps and incel culture and women now try and cash in on that by using manipulation to make men want to give them their hard earned bucks"
This is different from strippers and champagne girls how? Women have used looks to sucker horny men out of their money since the first thot climbed out of a tree
I agree with shaming people to a certain extent, and think it is a powerful tool when combined with guidance catered to the individual, but the libertarian in me thinks this is perverse in a more malicious way than self-destructive (if profitable) hedonism.
Fundamentally those shaming such girls playing at being women are fulfilling a predatory role similar to those of their enablers or more literal predators in the venues attention seeking women are known to gather at. While the purpose of shaming is often "shape up or ship out" the threat of ostracization / rejection is not always itself the end goal - as people that genuinely care offer a healthy carrot option along with the stick. A carrot isn't cocaine or free bottle service and dancing with the DJ, but when combined with the stick at the very least it makes the individual reevaluate their own actions and the cost of continuing as they have been.
It could be argued that reintroducing them to family is part of that process and thus other than malicious, however I think that it is a hard case to make for internet strangers trading cash for sex.
Personal responsibility is a big part of being conservative, and this scattershot (if cruelly amusing) methodology is not what I would call responsible. Some people do end up being fucked up by their family or other bad experiences, and they self destruct and destroy themselves to feel as though they're in control.
I love having cheap laughs, but sometimes the price is too high, and I think this is one of those cases.
It's sad, but some dudes just have no restraint and end up simping, then they prop up these young women and it creates a shitty situation for everyone. Twitch used to just be a gaming site and now it's a festering shitscape of thots and their legions of pay piggies that cause all kinds of changes and ruin it for the rest of us. Youtube is the same way, shit all of social media really.
I dunno, Twitch hired some "guy" who thinks he's a deer to manage their community, I think Twitch killed themselves long before the thots did.
If someone is not interfering with your or anyone else's health, property, or liberty let them live their lives. I think the guy that sent photos to the dads is a tool. Who died and made him the moral police? Do onto others, the golden rule, do you want someone sending your dad things you do that he would disapprove of?
Yes-ish.
That's a slippery slope. When laws are not being broken, and no one is doing anything against their own will, who decides what is classified as correct and holy and what falls into "darkest and scummiest places"?
I worry that is a flip-side liberal thought. "I'm right; your wrong. Reee."
Personal responsibility is a two-way street. If some dumbasses are paying these women a lot of money for whatever reason, that's their problem.
Yes, the women are preying on them. Yes they're stupid to part with their money. Plenty of blame to go around--but ignoring one side while admonishing the other goes completely counter to the tenants of individual responsibility.
"Modern day dating created simps and incel culture and women now try and cash in on that by using manipulation to make men want to give them their hard earned bucks"
This is different from strippers and champagne girls how? Women have used looks to sucker horny men out of their money since the first thot climbed out of a tree
I don't think it takes any conditioning to lust after thots; a billion years of evolution has taken care of that nicely.
I'm not too butthurt by individual vices, and all people are vulnerable or not in proportion to there ability to sniff out and fend off bull shit.
I’m sorry to say, but this is funny as fuck. What’s the term for this? Undercover simp to complete boss?
It’s a great warning for others. Keep your legs closed. The snatch you save might be your own.
I agree with shaming people to a certain extent, and think it is a powerful tool when combined with guidance catered to the individual, but the libertarian in me thinks this is perverse in a more malicious way than self-destructive (if profitable) hedonism.
Fundamentally those shaming such girls playing at being women are fulfilling a predatory role similar to those of their enablers or more literal predators in the venues attention seeking women are known to gather at. While the purpose of shaming is often "shape up or ship out" the threat of ostracization / rejection is not always itself the end goal - as people that genuinely care offer a healthy carrot option along with the stick. A carrot isn't cocaine or free bottle service and dancing with the DJ, but when combined with the stick at the very least it makes the individual reevaluate their own actions and the cost of continuing as they have been.
It could be argued that reintroducing them to family is part of that process and thus other than malicious, however I think that it is a hard case to make for internet strangers trading cash for sex.
Personal responsibility is a big part of being conservative, and this scattershot (if cruelly amusing) methodology is not what I would call responsible. Some people do end up being fucked up by their family or other bad experiences, and they self destruct and destroy themselves to feel as though they're in control.
I love having cheap laughs, but sometimes the price is too high, and I think this is one of those cases.
well said
You wrote too much for me.