I follow a strict interpretation of the bible (i.e., authorial intent) just like I do of the constitution, and this doesn't lead me to these ridiculous claims. Lewis wasn't an occultist.
It depends what you mean by "occultist". His friend Cecil Harwood was an Anthroposophist, and Charles Williams certainly had unorthodox ideas, tried to practice them and used them in his writings.
Jesus isn’t a lion. Ra, the Egyptian sun god, is a lion by way of an ancient pun.The lion is the king of the jungle, the strongest of those who live outside of God’s law, whose legitimacy is guaranteed not by God’s will but by his own might. The lion is lucifer, not Jesus (who is typically portrayed as a lamb, no? Not as a predator!).
Symbols have meaning, anon. (((They))) laugh and laugh at us as we hold up their many satanic/pagan symbols as Christian symbols. Further, there is no need to analogize the bible since the bible stands on its own.
I am not saying we should burn these books or anything. There is nothing wrong with reading, even enjoying the written ideas of the (((enemy))). It is important, however, that you also understand.
Uhhh..this cite also calls the perseverance of the saints false doctrine. Says Gods unconditional love for his children (those Christ died for) is false doctrine. You need to dump this source becuase your error on CS Lewis seems to stem from trusting a false authority and misreading scripture.
IMO they're both occultists, not Christians.
Let me guess - listening to rock and roll will send me to hell?
“If it’s got a syncopated rhythm then your soul is gonna rot!”
Source or shush.
His sources are probably based on strict interpretation of the Bible, mostly like this.
"C.S. Lewis: The Devil's Wisest Fool"
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/cs_lewis-fool.htm
They also have similar complaints about Harry Potter, Dungeons and Dragons, etc.
I follow a strict interpretation of the bible (i.e., authorial intent) just like I do of the constitution, and this doesn't lead me to these ridiculous claims. Lewis wasn't an occultist.
There is always need for some moderation in all things, even the Bible.
It depends what you mean by "occultist". His friend Cecil Harwood was an Anthroposophist, and Charles Williams certainly had unorthodox ideas, tried to practice them and used them in his writings.
Jesus isn’t a lion. Ra, the Egyptian sun god, is a lion by way of an ancient pun.The lion is the king of the jungle, the strongest of those who live outside of God’s law, whose legitimacy is guaranteed not by God’s will but by his own might. The lion is lucifer, not Jesus (who is typically portrayed as a lamb, no? Not as a predator!).
Symbols have meaning, anon. (((They))) laugh and laugh at us as we hold up their many satanic/pagan symbols as Christian symbols. Further, there is no need to analogize the bible since the bible stands on its own.
I am not saying we should burn these books or anything. There is nothing wrong with reading, even enjoying the written ideas of the (((enemy))). It is important, however, that you also understand.
Uhhh..this cite also calls the perseverance of the saints false doctrine. Says Gods unconditional love for his children (those Christ died for) is false doctrine. You need to dump this source becuase your error on CS Lewis seems to stem from trusting a false authority and misreading scripture.
nods head
Yep, on the money, and they were both friends with L ron Hubbard..but their estates have buried proof of it