Public lynchings can damn well be the result of a jury trial, ffs I never said without a trial, but every one of you snowflakes dog piled the PRESUMPTION that I meant without a trial. He deserves a trial, all I'm saying is, after seeing all these rapists and murderers get freed from jail, I want to see retribution! No more slaps on the wrist, I want real justice. You complacent fools.
Words have meaning. Lynchings are extra-judicial punishments regardless of trial. It is mob justice and anytime you add a descriptor to the word justice, you are no longer talking about justice.
Perhaps your chose poorly in your wording. Your problem doesn't seem to be with life in prison, but democrat governors letting them go because they might get the flu. If that is true, I'd focus on the core of the problem.
I was actually not aware that lynchings were extra judicial. I figured it was done as punishment by jury. I'm only suggesting it as a replacement for life in prison or lethal injection. You're absolutely right though, it was poor wording, out of ignorance. Thats another good point, my main quarrel is with the demons letting these people out of jail.
That's alright. We've all been there, but it is good that you can take this and learn from it.
One lesson I've learned over the years is to always ask myself if I'm focused on the problem or the symptom.
In the context of early release: Is it ever a good thing under any circumstance? Is it early release that is the problem or is it the piss poor judgment of those making the decision to release? If it is the poor judgment, why? Why are they deciding to release people for a minor virus?
It leads to an elaborate rabbit hole until you boil it down to first principles (principles that rely on no other assumption). What is prison for? Retribution, incapacitation, deterrence or rehabilitation?
Interesting approach. Definitely merit to that. I appreciate your calm, calcluated approach, rather than putting words in my mouth. Wise people like you are a fountain of life.
Early release would be good if they were innocent of the crime, or of they had the book thrown at them like flynn. To answer your question, i would say equally all four parts.
Public lynchings can damn well be the result of a jury trial, ffs I never said without a trial, but every one of you snowflakes dog piled the PRESUMPTION that I meant without a trial. He deserves a trial, all I'm saying is, after seeing all these rapists and murderers get freed from jail, I want to see retribution! No more slaps on the wrist, I want real justice. You complacent fools.
Then why don't you lynch the judicial branch?
But by all means don't go off being unlawful and making mobs and acting as executioner.
Like why do you sound more angry at the scum rather than the people letting them go?
Because i just watched this guy beat the shit out of two helpless elders?
Corrupt deepstaters and their media puppets also deserve a day at the gallows.
Words have meaning. Lynchings are extra-judicial punishments regardless of trial. It is mob justice and anytime you add a descriptor to the word justice, you are no longer talking about justice.
Perhaps your chose poorly in your wording. Your problem doesn't seem to be with life in prison, but democrat governors letting them go because they might get the flu. If that is true, I'd focus on the core of the problem.
I was actually not aware that lynchings were extra judicial. I figured it was done as punishment by jury. I'm only suggesting it as a replacement for life in prison or lethal injection. You're absolutely right though, it was poor wording, out of ignorance. Thats another good point, my main quarrel is with the demons letting these people out of jail.
That's alright. We've all been there, but it is good that you can take this and learn from it.
One lesson I've learned over the years is to always ask myself if I'm focused on the problem or the symptom.
In the context of early release: Is it ever a good thing under any circumstance? Is it early release that is the problem or is it the piss poor judgment of those making the decision to release? If it is the poor judgment, why? Why are they deciding to release people for a minor virus?
It leads to an elaborate rabbit hole until you boil it down to first principles (principles that rely on no other assumption). What is prison for? Retribution, incapacitation, deterrence or rehabilitation?
Interesting approach. Definitely merit to that. I appreciate your calm, calcluated approach, rather than putting words in my mouth. Wise people like you are a fountain of life. Early release would be good if they were innocent of the crime, or of they had the book thrown at them like flynn. To answer your question, i would say equally all four parts.