279
Comments (59)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
George 7 points ago +9 / -2

Good of the country? Shut the fuck up. You are talking about lynching. You are talking about denying a man his right to a trial. Aren't you mad about the unconstitutional orders that governments have been enforcing, and here you are saying we should bring back public lynching.

Good fucking grief.

If we are to call oursselves a free country then we cannot deny any man his basic right to a trial or any rights at that.

-1
Hillary2020 [S] -1 points ago +2 / -3

Public lynchings can damn well be the result of a jury trial, ffs I never said without a trial, but every one of you snowflakes dog piled the PRESUMPTION that I meant without a trial. He deserves a trial, all I'm saying is, after seeing all these rapists and murderers get freed from jail, I want to see retribution! No more slaps on the wrist, I want real justice. You complacent fools.

3
dems_be_crazy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Words have meaning. Lynchings are extra-judicial punishments regardless of trial. It is mob justice and anytime you add a descriptor to the word justice, you are no longer talking about justice.

Perhaps your chose poorly in your wording. Your problem doesn't seem to be with life in prison, but democrat governors letting them go because they might get the flu. If that is true, I'd focus on the core of the problem.

0
Hillary2020 [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

I was actually not aware that lynchings were extra judicial. I figured it was done as punishment by jury. I'm only suggesting it as a replacement for life in prison or lethal injection. You're absolutely right though, it was poor wording, out of ignorance. Thats another good point, my main quarrel is with the demons letting these people out of jail.