2893
Comments (168)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
52
ProphetOfKek 52 points ago +52 / -0

In other news: some scientists are retarded.

42
RespectMyNipples5 42 points ago +42 / -0

Social scientists.

21
chuckachookah 21 points ago +22 / -1

Good point.

WAPO loves to drop those qualifiers and let the ready jump to (incorrect) conclusions.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
GottliebPins 5 points ago +5 / -0

Political scientists.

3
EntilZha 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doctors (of Gender Studies) agree.

20
OmarsHijab 20 points ago +20 / -0

Paid off*

2
MedPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

93,000+ patients and ZERO of them with Zinc as part of the treatment. Either patients aren't getting Hydroxy + Zithromax +Zinc (They are, some of ours are on that treatment plan) or they intentionally omitted such patients.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
11
powershellder 11 points ago +11 / -0

Another trick is when the headline is a question, the answer is usually “no”.

“Did Trump collude with Russia against Hillary Clinton?”

“No.”

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
stanplank 7 points ago +7 / -0

'fears are growing' or 'calls are growing'. There's never any evidence of the claim though.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
EntilZha 4 points ago +4 / -0

NY Slimes and Washington Compost have poisoned the well of "confidential sources" for reporters for at least a generation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
14
kag-2020- 14 points ago +14 / -0

Speculation Scientists

12
Modern_Times 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just look at how many sign off on global warming; That should be a good indicator.

10
ProphetOfKek 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hard not to when your grant money depends on it. Not that that’s an excuse.