Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
VERY high T party! That has the wrong optics though; they'd confuse us with Libertarians, lol. Stop the bs with ASR15s if necessary party also has the wrong optics, even if everybody's thinking it.
I just hope prosecutions are complete before 11/3, but I know they can't possibly be.
It’s not about being liked really other than acting like miss congeniality to garner votes.
It’s more like professional wrestling: both sides act like they hate each other and duke it out for show but at the end of the night they’re drinking together at the bar, slapping each other high fives at tricking the audience, with their paychecks in their pocket signed by the same boss.
Plus most of them on both sides have some skeletons in their closet, and they both know it, and that can be used as blackmail if either one steps out of line.
Most people entering public service don't do it for this reason. They actually want to make things better. Then two things happen: they get disillusioned, and they're amazed at how much money can be made. Usually once they get a taste of the power that goes along with it, they're too far gone to do any good.
This is why the left assumes Trump's in it for all the wrong reasons. Next time I hear somebody spout off that schtick I'm likely to go ballistic
This actually happens and is far FAR more common than you might think:
You are running for a local office. Some mystery donor wants to meet, so you go out to lunch. He writes a check out for 50k, something that in a grassroots campaign might make a lot of difference. He fills out the whole check except for the name.
The he says, "You are going to decide who this check goes to. Do you want it, or should I give it to the other guy?"
This is usually how it works, and it happens when you ENTER low level politics. So by the time youve worked your way up to higher positions, those people were already compromised long ago. And then it just gets worse from there.
its done on purpose to create a sense of demoralization. When someone bright eyed and feels they can 'make a difference' enters the maintenance room of thee machine only to find out how lazy everyone else is. How corrupt everyone else is and how sloppy they all are. They get the sense of dread that not even one person can make a difference. This is the FDR legacy, this is the Democrat legacy in full view.
You make government workers part timers and you'll see how fast our freedoms get restored to us. Mainly because there's no money and graft to be made in being a mid-level bureaucrat.
This check is given to the Official; why is bribery not illegal?
And if you take the check but keep your integrity, you're basically saying Soros doesn't contribute to your campaign in the next election. This should have 0 consequence.
I agree with your first part but disagree about what the left assumes about Trump. They just don’t want their dirty laundry Aires and know GEOTUS will do it. That’s my belief.
I wish that's all it was. I've heard WAY too many democrats express this very thing. Not even leftists; old people that maybe haven't voted D all their life but somehow wound up there.
There may be lots of people as you describe, I don't know. I don't see why they'd be defensive about dirty laundry being aired though; it's not their own. I mean if half the "dirty laundry" DJT's been accused of had even a morsel of truth, I'd be PISSED and want to know all about it.
Nah - I’m not talking about the retarded sheep followers. I’m talking about everyone in the media, Hollywood and in political office. They either have been raping children or taking bribes and know the party is about to end with a tremendous hangover if DJT gets 4 more years. The rest are just idiots.
The democrats stick together and fight way harder than the GOP.
What's so weird is that /r/politics claims it's the exact opposite -- the GOP always sticks together, doubles down, never backs down, and Democrats don't fight hard enough.
Whoa, the guy makes a good point (thank you Scott) don't discount him because you don't seen it.
He's right about r/politics, those turds do in fact claim it's GOP voters and their gov't reps that fight harder and stick together and whatnot. We can't dispute that, it's true, that's what they believe, and they are not quiet nor shy about their belief.
I'll give you a prime example; a thing that happened that frankly we consider a win but was really self-inflicted damage from Democrats, and how disappointed democrat voters and liberal faggots were that their guys couldn't fight, couldn't stick together.
Exhibit A: The Green New Deal.
They democrat voters love this hair-brained scheme to bankrupt their country and themselves: a half-baked five-page double-spaced size 14 font essay cooked up from something Alex Cortez misunderstood about the reality of the world and it's climate. It's D+ work at best, but they [Dem voters, r/politics users] love the Green New Deal because they buy into this climate change malarkey whole-heartedly. But Nancy hates it, DiFI hates it, Schumer hates it, and no one with a brain likes it either. Remember what happened when those conniving GOPers brought the Green New Deal to a vote? The Democrats in the house didn't want to call a vote on it, and when they had to vote, they all voted "present" instead of "yea". Green New Deal went down in flames like the laughing stock it is. BUT... that's a major letdown for the Democrat voters and le redditeurs on r/politics. Accusations abound that their own team can't all play together *and for the *planet ** no less!
There's lots of much smaller stuff too: Schiff and Nadler bungled impeachment, Nancy and Schumer couldn't negotiate DACA, Ginsburg should have left office when the gay muslim was in the White House, DiFi told those cute school children who came to her office to beg her to do something about Climate Change and endorse the GND and she told them to grow up because they're just stupid children and they're not in charge of anything...
They have their own theater where they watch their own politics film, and in that film they see that their own party is disjointed and non-functional and their villain is the GOP and by extension us, and in their film we're a very competent villain.
@mishaclara, I actually think we are seeing the end of the Republican party and the Democratic party as we know it. I really do. What do you think the new party will be?
We need some kind of realignment, somewhere. I've never seen a party that represents what I believe. I believe in wisely regulated freedom, liberty and Capitalism. The Libertarians are close, but their stupidity regarding regulation and government is a non-starter. They're way too close to the Anarchism party.
Basically, what I want is the anti-Authoritarian party. Maximize Liberty and Freedom while recognizing that government has a role in smoothing out the rough parts and preserving things for future generations. There are parts of the Republicans that are way too Authoritarian, and unfortunately there are a lot of people here who are okay with it, because it happens to align with their own personal beliefs. Government should be protecting liberty and freedom FROM people's personal beliefs. It's that part of the Republicans that drive many people away and turn them into "Never-Republicans". It's not that they like all the Democrat corruption, it's that the Republicans give them no other possible home.
And I hate the term "Conservative". I'm not conservative in the sense that I want to never improve anything. I want to fix problems and evolve toward a better and better civilization. I'm a liberal in the classic definition of "maximize Liberty". We need way better labels.
"Conservative" in no way means "never improve anything." This false impression is what makes people think progressivism is the answer.
I don't think the Libertarian party stands for anything, at all. Talk to 10 libertarians, get 12 opinions. The concept should be limited government. Our founding Fathers were wise enough to know that government is evil, but it's a necessary evil. The Constitution exists largely to hem the federal government in; anything it isn't specifically empowered to do in the Constitution, it is forbidden from having the power to do. Except We the People haven't kept them honest with this.
We need to fix this. That may require refreshing a certain tree ... but right now I see it's the States (Governors) that are the biggest offenders. What a switch!
"Conservative" in no way means "never improve anything." This false impression is what makes people think progressivism is the answer.
Exactly why it's such a crappy term and why I hate it so much. It's like calling ourselves "Never Changists" and then telling everyone it doesn't really mean that. Words have meanings.
Libertarians also believe we should sell off the National Parks (right in their platform).
I once had a debate with a Libertarian that private nukes should be allowed. I'm a strong believer in personal defense, but that's the idiocy of Libertarians. It's all applying simple rules to a complex world with no nuance, wisdom or common sense.
They also don't have any leg to stand on when it comes to foreign policy. I'm an isolationist in the sense that we shouldn't be invading countries for their resources, but I'm also smart enough to know there are countries out there that would want to topple America because we set the bar on individual freedom and will always be an example to the rest of the world. I also understand that smaller countries who want to hold that bar as high want our protection. I'm glad Trump is calling out the reason why we were the police of the world: because no one else wanted to donate resources into the effort. While past presidents have used that as a means to conduct anything they want, trump is reeling it in, and has shown peace through power.
For the record, the actual philosophy of libertarianism doesn't support open borders. Libertarianism has a foundation in property rights, aka a fucking border. The left has co-opted libertarianism and turned then into "left libertarians" who are SJW-lites. Completely illogical.
Look, someone who has been brainwashed their entire life by the left.
Or, you could stop acting brainwashed by your biases and actually, you know, READ WHAT I WROTE.
I know what it means and what it represents. But the word itself sucks and drives people away. Why do I want to drive people away from the ideas of Liberty and Freedom? I don't, which is why I don't use words that drive people away. Not that all of conservative philosophy actually believes in Liberty and Freedom, but they're closer than a lot of other political stripes.
Bottom line, it doesn't matter what conservatives think conservative means. I'm trying to convince new people, particularly new generations.
You're picking a weird battle. He's talking about the marketing aspect of conservatism and offering his opinion on it. You're just being rude for no reason. You can disagree but his opinion on the marketing of conservatism doesn't reflect his political leanings.
The word only drives people away because the left has poisoned people against it. Seriously go look at the dictionary definitions of the word conservative and all of its derivations. It's a very accurate way to portray the party as a whole.
If you really want to be so fussy about it then call yourself a constitutionalist.
Conservative in no way means "never changing anything." It means you're predisposed to conserve things and to limit change, and that you take a cautious approach to all things.
Conservativism is how this country should be run. A bill shouldn't be rammed through Congress on the grounds of an emergency that increases incentives for healthcare companies to lie and extort money from the government. A gun ban shouldn't be instituted just because of a mass shooting somewhere. Everything should be taken with an abundance of caution when it comes to passing new laws and legislations because you can't always tell how freedoms will be destroyed and what loopholes will be created if you proceed too quickly with such wide ranging policy decisions.
Conservative in no way means "never changing anything." It means you're predisposed to conserve things and to limit change, and that you take a cautious approach to all things.
Conservativism is how this country should be run. A bill shouldn't be rammed through Congress on the grounds of an emergency that increases incentives for healthcare companies to lie and extort money from the government. A gun ban shouldn't be instituted just because of a mass shooting somewhere. Everything should be taken with an abundance of caution when it comes to passing new laws and legislations because you can't always tell how freedoms will be destroyed and what loopholes will be created if you proceed too quickly with such wide ranging policy decisions.
I say just go for a "Constitutionalist" party. Perhaps something to do with Logos or Truth, since Truth (of the Divine sort) is such a powerful concept in our founding
-Extreme government reductions in Welfare/education/etc. Yes even for vets. (The less we spend the less we tax, the lower price of living is, easier to find work and a house for disenfranchised. Charity rises with these numbers)
-Extreme tax reductions, and the abolition of Income Tax
-Obliteration of federal banks and fiat currency.
-Setting a definite limit of rules allowed on books (to prevent bureaucracy)
-Setting a word/page limit to legislature to prevent Pork that gets read by noone passing in congress.
-Honoring patents and copyrights for ALL.
-Ending of ALL Limits on the second amendment currently in the books.
The Constitutionalist party exists. Great ideas; they've never done anything. Your second sentence deserves discussion, since people exist that don't realize this isn't any violation of the principle of separation of Church and State. The FFRF (Freedom From Religion Foundation) is exactly such a bunch of idiots, and their HQ is about 50 miles from here.
People need to realize that when Cryin' Chuck etc talk about using this plannedemic to "advance their agenda," FFRF is included. Plus a million other evil things.
I took one of those "what party should you vote for quizzes" and it turns out I agreed 96% with the constitution party. Too bad the constitution party is about as obscure as the communist party of the USA.
I just took a look at the Constitution party. A lot of it is good, but there's really tragic irony in calling themselves the "Constitution" party when the Constitution intentionally makes no references to God or a specific religion. The first part of the Constitution party platform is, "...gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States."
Way to miss the point of religious freedom, Constitution Party. Christianity is great, but I do not want the government giving me a particular interpretation of religion. Religion is a strictly private matter between an individual and their God, and the government has no place in telling me what or how to believe.
There's a reason the founding fathers did it the way they did, and too many people don't understand the importance of it.
Imagine agreeing with everything else but drawing a line on God.
Public schools really battered into our heads the dangers of Christianity in politics.
Oh well. At least the gays can marry. Sorry we put trannies in public libraries and called you a bigot if you disagreed with it. Sorry that same tranny molested a kid. If that kid is molested, there's a good chance he too can become a mythical tranny if he chops off his dick and pumps himself full of hormones.
And isn't it great the demographics of all European countries will be transformed in about 30 years? Lol Haha its kinda funny really, white genocide (xd).
At least marijuana is legal. It's pretty cool to get high and think deeply about nothing at all. All your favorite rappers and movie stars do it. Seth Rogan, dude brah! Joe Rogan, dude brah! Lil Yachty! And soon your favorite sportsballers(who all hate America and whites) will be doing it. Don't you wanna be cool bruh?
And sex, man sex is great. Premarital extramarital anything except just boring o' marital! Gay sex, group sex. Gotta protect the NAPs, too - Non Aggressive Pedophiles. Lord knows society is too harsh on them.
God is fine -- just not in government. Let me be clear: You're welcome to your interpretation of religion, but I do NOT want your interpretation forced on me or my children.
Assuming you're not a Catholic, imagine if the Catholics were dominant in American government, and they decided that we needed the Pope to be taught as divinely inspired in public schools as part of school prayer. That's an extreme example, but it illustrates why I don't want ANYONE'S interpretation of religion anywhere near me or my children. You seem to think that Christians are somehow immune from being corrupt, but history teaches a very different lesson, lots and lots of times.
At least we didn't put God in the constitution!
Yes, thank God. If you need your religion pushed on everyone with the force of government, then the problem is with how you're preaching to people, not with the government. If you can't teach your children religion at home, then your problem is with your home, not with the schools. Take care of your own business and leave me and my children alone. We're fine, thanks. I don't need or want your interpretation of religion.
That's all wonderful and you're welcome to your opinion. As long as you keep your opinion to yourself and never, ever, try and put that opinion into law, or force it on me or my children in any way, then we're good. Parts of it I agree with, and parts of it I believe you're dead wrong about. And that's why the founding fathers wrote the constitution the way they did, and why religious freedom is Amendment #1.
Keep religion in church and families, keep administration in government, and nobody needs to have any problems.
But we already have countries build around Islamic values. How's that experiment working?
Terrible -- exactly because they mix religion into government.
Fair enough. Just do me a favor and drop any references to “rights”, because without someone higher than humanity to bestow them, you’re left with whoever wields power.
Actually, and this is really cool, the Truths that are self-evident are capitalized as to inform that the Truths are universal. They are universal despite the religion you follow. It's why in the D.o.I. "Truths" is capitalized. It's about LOGOS or the Word. This is YUUUUGE.
Technically, the land itself Bestows those rights. Be it the Universe or whatever. Christian God plays only a personal part in it for individuals of Christian nature. Others would view this as a Deist concept.
The fact that youve never seen a party that represents what you believe, and neither has anyone else, is by design. We are all a lot alike, and we all have similar ideas about what government should look like, but our natural platform is split in half ---> republicans get one half of it, dems get the other, and then both halves of that platform are twisted, warped, and filled with poison.
They want us all to be acclimated to the dissatisfaction we feel with BOTH parties, so that you never get a taste of what real representation is like.
Also it's pretty much impossible to find even another single person who agrees with everything that you do. Political parties are a give and take. This is why I get frustrated on here when people say you shouldn't vote for this Republican or that Republican because they dont agree with Trump on these two topics.
I'll always vote for someone who will vote with Trump 70% of the time compared to someone who will vote with Trump 0% of the time. Purity control in parties is an absolute poison and is what causes the two halves of our system to constantly be at war. When you're not allowed to be an anti-gun Republican or an anti-abortion Democrat it just leads to gatekeeping and makes a lot of people become disinterested in government in the first place. Which is dangerous because that's when government will take the chance to grab more power, when the people aren't paying attention.
The NSA and spy powers that arose from 9/11 allowed more ability for the powers that be to leverage the politicians into compliant mailable traitorous cunts.
Hmmm ... when you say TPTB I take that to mean the swamp; i.e. those that own the Fed and control our currency, and profit obscenely from it. They're known for not caring who makes our laws as long as they can control our currency.
So I'm thinking you're not referring to them? Our IC (intelligence community) probably works for them far more than they do anything in the interest of the US, so these are the folks you refer to with leverage? That seems to pertain to Gowdy, but I can't say I know how this leverage works. Or maybe Trey just stayed more loyal to the FBI than the US?
But yes the grossly misnamed "patriot act" sure gave our IC lots more power. I guess I never thought about that power being used over or against Congress.
I feel we would have been where we are now with Dems/rino much sooner had 9/11 never happened. It basically forced them to love America and support it for a little.
Yes, the horrible spying/surveillance state also came out of it.
it was WW2. There are multiple instances of us and Britain executing spies and traitors after ww2. In Britain, they executed a radio show host who was pro-nazi and used to broadcast a propaganda show in English for Englanders.
Execute a spy or traitor? You must be dreaming. We don’t do that anymore. We hand them book deals now and a spot on the CNN panels. Deserters? Even better? We send out real soldiers to go get him back at the risk of their own lives.
Yup, the enemy within is far more dangerous than external forces. That is what is so scary, our chunk of the population is going up against the entire world AND our own countrymen
Oh I've known how big the swamp is since 1990 and I've been trying to raise people's awareness of it all this time. Not familiar with Bongino in the least and I usually avoid Tucker. He's spot on here though! He also seems to be getting better.
one reason to catch a bongino sometimes is that he is known to have some of the highest level reliable inside sources in news. Even senators and congressmen will occasionally comment about it like Nunez saying sometimes he'll be watching the Bongino and think 'Wow! Who in the HECK are your sources!? Not many people could have known that!'
Why avoid Tucker? Every news program has its bias. Tucker at least seems to care. And I have yet to see him blatantly lie the way CNN and MSNBC do on the regular. I'm actually curious.
Most of the time I've seen Tucker he just seemed dumb, or dumbed down, maybe deliberately to appeal to the masses more? Overly simple, even when he did make a good point.
Lately he's come out with some great truth though. Of course there's been so MUCH of it! I'll agree he's always seemed to care, and to be honest and sincere. I like that. I hope he can undo all the influence peddling Jon Stewart did, but there seems to be no aisle crossing anymore I dunno ...
His opening monologue is all you need to catch. He has been on fucking point every time i tuned in more so these last six months
I know what you mean though and some of his guests are retards he brings on to spar with. I’m telling you just give him a shot, just watch his opening monologue
Jon's hypocrisy was so thick in that one. Acting all sanctimonious and preachy on crossfire. Then turned around and did worse than what he alleged crossfire was doing.
Back in my daily show days as a naive high schooler I thought Stewart wiped the floor with the “bow tie tucker” but my how times have changed 😂
I rewatched the video around 2016 election and man was I in liberal la la land. Tucker was still an inexperienced young buck at the time. I’d LOVE to see them get together and talk again during these times. I still think Tucker is just a cog in the system but damnit he’s MY cog!
Every time you hit Stewart with a good point, he just says oh but I'm just doing comedy. But he can come on your show and take a giant shit on it? Its a cop out, you don't get it both ways.
Its funny because I watched that when it originally aired and thought Jon came out the "winner" so to speak. But looking back at it with a more educated perspective, and without the spin, I was duped without realizing it.
Add a little more context: pre 911 game shows were the thing. Then 24 hour news cycle started after 911 and game shows were kaput. Pretty quickly they didn't have that many new developments to need a 24 hour news cycle, but that's still the loop most are stuck in.
But yeah in 2004 CNN was still viewed as credible by most. They started out as mostly showing legislative sessions, which is a legitimate way to help produce an informed electorate which is the only reason the press was given freedom in our Constitution to begin with.
Thanks for the link, I'm trying to take it in now. I found Stewart somewhat funny maybe late '99, before his opinions made him intolerable.
The funny thing about Jon Stewart;s Crossfire 'beatdown' is that at the time Jon Stewart was incredibly more influential on the Daily Show than Tucker was on Crossfire. Stewart was more than willing to go on Tucker's show and berate him for failing to give a fair and honest representation of what people really care about, while also actively dismissing his own responsibility to a larger audience. "I come on after Crank Yankers" he said, as if the subliminal, incorrect messaging coming from the Daily Show wasn't just as caustic to society, if not moreso, than the mockery of 'important debate' Crossfire was.
Anyone who watched the Daily Show during the writer's strike, where they attempted to try and still run the show without the writers behind the scenes doing the job, and you'll realize how much of a puppet all of those shows are. It's just a script and they're just actors. Compare that to the way that Tucker Carlson's show is now. I don't think Stewart obliterated Carlson then, or changed his mind. At best perhaps he pointed out, hypocritically, that the country is always in desperate need of honest news. I don't think that was news to Tucker at the time, however.
it was dangerous and crappy because a bunch of liberals watched it daily and forgot that in order to be well informed, you have to actually read the news. They thought John was all they needed.
John himself ran his show in the style of SNL vintage Dennis Miller, where you can tell from the outset that he is comedy. At least in his first half of his daily show stint, he is NOT in any way trying to pass himself off as news.
But the way the show was packaged, the way viewers tended to watch it... took him more seriously than he took himself. And then he started to believe that garbage, and became a more circumspect host, everything started to slide away from comedy and toward this kind of propaganda news crap.
Why would anybody let Jon Stewart influence them? If you're going to have your generation be influenced, at least let it be by The Who or Jimi Hendrix or Led Zeppelin or even Ozzy Osborne. Hey, War Pigs is every bit as relevant now as the day it was written. His dark stuff is mainly warnings to not be evil. Ironic.
Jon Stewart was orders of magnitude better than both Stephen Colbert and Trevor Noah, and is a huge supporter of 9/11 families. He had a liberal bias but it was a different sort of bias at the time.
The deleted comment contained this link. You need to read it. And it's VERY typical Jon Stewart, not some one off.
Mockingbird is completely in sync with how the Fed bought and controlled the MSM, and has nothing to do with "zionism" which merely means the existence of Israel as a Nation.
Don't spread nazism here. Brain dead Storm Trooper bs just has no place. Get some facts right and all that crap washes down the drain where it belongs.
You're expressing nazi sentiment. It is false. Not everyone who owns the Fed is Jewish. They may be over represented there and in the rest of the problematic institutions, but it's not exclusively Jewish, it's not because of Judaism, neither are all Jews the problem.
Please see the link below that specifically debunks the woefully wrong claim about this individual
Lots of people! Some are arabs - not exactly Jewish. Some are Chinese, which doesn't mean that the whole problem is China like many here concluded. Also note that the Fed has many different branches. It's the NY branch that's most important because it controls the most money. It's an interesting exercise to see which private individuals own this for profit corporation, and also to see what else they own.
No, generalizations are not okay. If you have a legitimate gripe about someone, or about Israeli policy or something legitimate fine. But you’re clearly an antisemite. Do better.
Nope. Stewart's a leftist. Or smarter than that, but still responds like a puppet. "Mossad" is not what's been controlling the Fed since 1913. Neither is China. Neither are Jews. Neither is Judaism. Neither is everyone who's Jewish.
Arabs own it. Chinese own it. And yes, Jews are over-represented there and in all the related groups. It's about money and power, not religion.
Is that how millennials got so fucked up? Lol I thought it was far more complex. No really no generation is a monolithic block. It'd be nice if our society could return to recognizing individuals.
It was one of those deals like the Ukranian phone call with Donald Trump. They all just decided that no matter what really happened, they were going to tell everyone that Jon Stewart demolished Tucker. It's no different than Schiff going up there and reading his own version of the call. Total bullshit hit job.
Kind of like when Slavoj "destroyed" Jordan peterson.
Peterson said he doesnt know a lot about communism, but you can start with points of fallacy in the Communist Manifesto.
Then Slavoj, after having just heard Peterson say that he is not well versed in communism, but has studied the CManifest, proceeds to force Peterson to return over and over again to subjects he is not versed as well in, and discounting the CManifesto as irrelavant to todays marxism.
That was a complete mexican hat dance around what would have been a debate if Slavoj knew how to debate.
And then is it really fair if one of them is high on amphetamines and the other one is doped up on sedatives???
The comedy tells the story of what happens when a small Wisconsin town transforms into a political circus after a top Democratic strategist (Steve Carell) sees a video of a retired Marine colonel (Chris Cooper) standing up for the rights of his town’s undocumented workers and believes he has found the key to winning back America's Heartland. However, when the Republicans counter him by sending in his brilliant nemesis Faith (Rose Byrne), what started out as a local race quickly becomes an out-of-control and hilarious fight for the soul of America.
Remember the time when movies went out of their way to display politicians as blank slates, without the slightest inference of what party they were representing?
Well, I mean, at least they used to be subtle about it.
"undocumented workers" have NO rights other than the right to gtfo and be correctly identified as ILLEGAL ALIENS. They certainly have nothing to do with "winning back America's heartland."
LEGAL workers? Fine.
There's nothing "hilarious" about "fighting for the soul of America." Maybe movie theaters should just stay closed if this is the crap they're going to poison society with.
I'll live in WI the rest of my life. I don't mean to be oversensitive but FUCK THAT. You know the phrase "some things are worth dying for?" Yeah no. War is not dying for your Country, it's the art of making the other SOB die for wanting to fuck up your Country. This is far too real to be in any way humorous. And VA proved that the time for peaceful protest is over.
I feel like how you walk away from that interview is a window into where a person is in their understanding of the political landscape. Those who see Stewart obliterating Carlson (and I was one of those people at the time) haven't yet understood the wide reach of propaganda going on in America. Once you understand how the leftists are programming everybody, Stewart comes across as a blatant hypocrite who got caught and is desparetly trying to backpedal.
It was mostly body language. They were expecting a goofball and he came in crying and pointing fingers. A LOT of people got all of their news from the daily show rag and he said “its comedy central bro.” I wasnt aware of who was who then but it was flawed logic and hypocrisy even to a younger apolitical me
I believe Tapper is basically a decent person. Being paid to lie on a daily basis is bad for you, especially if you know deep down what you are doing is wrong.
Notice how he occasionally reports something that is true, as if to show himself that he's still a good guy
Yeah it's almost as if they have a little clique of connected people who try to control both sides of the political discourse in our nation
Levin and Shapiro both hated Trump and did everything they did to stop his election until he won, then when they realized how wrong they were and how little voters valued their opinions they tried to jump on the band wagon
Now people are allowed to change their minds and admit they were wrong. And I'm allowed to say that Shapiro and Levin are hacks and I don't value their opinions or dubious insights.
Influential Jews are completely ok with complaining about "white privilege." In fact they're the ones funding progressive politicians. 7/8 of the largest Democratic donors are ethnic Jews (Eyechaner is the only one who doesn't have a Jewish parent)
And if your counter to someone finding it remarkable that the Democratic Party is almost completely funded by wealthy Jews (who are only 2-4 percent of the population) is to point out that the Republican Party is also funded by wealthy Jews, isn't that even more remarkable?
Is it not reasonable to ask if American politicians are selling out to Jewish donors and giving them an Israel First foreign policy?
Absolutely. I just find it counterproductive when people go Zoggin within doing their homework and bringing the receipts to back themselves and their positions up. But you have definitely done that here, so I will close by saying that I overall agree with you and suggest a couple policy changes:
No dual citizenship in congress
No foreign aid to Israel (or nearly anyone else)
Relegalization of BDS and natl divestment from West Bank
Lobbying groups for other countries are outlawed
Relegalization of criticism of Israel and questioning of history
BDS has one goal: cause Israel to cease existing. Not ok.
"Natl divestment from west bank." US, or Israel?
I agree with the rest, but "questioning of history" in this context usually means holocaust denial. Just no. If you want to compare how other ethnicities were killed on a larger scale than Jews? Ok. Nazism was largely about genocide and racial supremacy. Jews were singled out as the worst, but lots more Soviets were killed. Civilians in Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad may not be counted as accurately, (or maybe are counted more accurately?) but just in these 3 cities more Soviets were killed nazis than Jews were.
Yep, me, a TD commenter, I'm the same as an overwhelming amount of media owners and talking heads who are all of a certain persuasion. Totally spiritual brothers. Ad hominem, the tactic of fags without arguments.
Maybe 2-5 Senators and 10-20 Representatives care about this country and common sense. The rest are the equivalent of a medieval court protecting their quasi oligarchy and king, the DS. Undoing this will take years of concerted effort at the local, state, and federal levels. We can't participate only in the presidential election and expect anything to change. A true MAGA (NOT republican/democrat) majority in Congress would solve almost every problem that matters. They are the swamp's mother and gatekeeper.
I know it’s popular here to spitball about, but we MUST FORM A NEW MAGA TYPE POLITICAL PARTY.
No more vote republican and hope they’re based, no more that guy that’s been in DC for a decade might still be one of us. Seriously, this shot is imperative.
How in the fuck do we start getting the mall rolling, besides funding??
Congress was duped when the swamp took over. That was in 1913 with the creation of the Fed (and the IRS)
We do not have time to exist as a Nation to change Congress that much and let them take the lead. They have fucked it up that much. Citizen's arrest is legal when we stop a felony in progress. About 40 Governors deny sick people medicine. It's criminal! 20,0000 at each State Capitol at the same time is more than enough to insure nobody needs to get hurt. I could do it with 300, but getting out might get a little dicey. We do this the rest of our enemies retreat to their shadows where they prefer to operate anyway. DJT says he "caught them all," that means he can help us rout them out of their hiding places. Class action lawsuits, both civil and criminal is how we gain long lasting victory, but we have to expect they take years to get through Court. We need results before November
There’s prob more we all agree on really but these fucks divide us to get a better grasp on their power and do the will of the people when it’s in their best interest not ours. Fuck them all!
Our President is such a hero. I can't believe he's made it through this far with every single person in DC fighting against him tooth and nail. He drags them all kicking and screaming toward a better America. Thank you God for giving us such a wonderful person to lead us!
A rising tide lifts all boats. Our past Presidents used our country to export wickedness and prop up terrible people. It's not just us that suffer their tyranny and likewise, he may help your people, instead of hold you down.
Absolutely. If the U.S is weak, all kinds of bad things happen. Obama brought nothing but war and misery to the world (ISIS, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Crimea and Ukraine) and the great migrant wave bringing islamic terror to Europe
If U.S becomes weak again after Trump, the world will be looking at China dominating the 21st century, that can't happen
China has serious designs on dominating from space. I'll see if I can dig up a link to a vid that covers this. A guy that has read everything the Chinese government has put out on the subject for something like 22 years.
Good clip. So do we have people lined up ready to help MAGA and take out these Rinos, and are the citizens educated enough to know to actually vote for them?
It's good that we've highlighted the problem, but we need to know the solutions just as much, if not more.
Leftists haven;t had a shred of integrity until just recently. Liberals are not the same thing as leftists. Or at least they didn't used to be. Now they've all been drug so far left it's hard to tell, but hopefully the DNC shoves the AOC wing out of the party and relegates them to third party status. It was looking like that would happen for a while there, anyway.
Parts of this make for a good long term ad campaign to rid the system of RINOs (imho).
Those of us who are conservatives and Trump supporters need to start calling out the RINO GOP. Once again, Thus group is the reason I donate to POTUS direct website in lieu of the RNC.
In some ways I disagree with this, actually. I am glad the Mueller investigation reached its natural conclusion, without interference. It revealed, unambiguously, that there was no Russian collusion, and nobody gives a shit about his wishy washy answer on obstruction when the crime being investigated never happened.
I think a lot of these congressional republicans made a calculation, they knew the President was innocent, and allowing the investigation to conclude on its own settled that question in the minds of every American who's not 100% dead set against Trump no matter what. If the investigation had been derailed or ended prematurely, MSMDNC could have endlessly spun it that Trump had something to hide and the American people never got a real answer. They tried anyway, but it didn't work.
Thanks for saying this. It might have been the better choice. My relatives are swing voters. After russiagate and ukrainegate, they said theyre never voting for another democrat again.
Well it seems to me that most people that aren't already Trump supporters completely skipped the memo that Mueller simply showed DJT's innocence, the shampeachment was worse than a waste because it deflected attention from CCPvirus, and Flynn is beyond innocent. (And by implication everyone else they went after in DJT's cabinet, too)
And yet RedPillMissionary says the exact opposite about people he knows a couple posts down; I hope there are a LOT of people in that category!!
I kinda do feel DJT acted like he wanted to stop Mueller, just so they would relentlessly pursue it. And used all that to expose the DS. This does have significant overlap with Q ...
There was nothing natural about the investigation and they wrote a bullshit report on it too. Half the American public thinks that the investigation declared Trump guilty.
We need term limits, and a retirement vote of confidence at large. Losing the VOC: no retirement pay and permanent bar from ANY public office, including appointments.
There's TONS of talent to take over in 2024. I don't think we can call it the GOP anymore though. DJT was never a Republican, and he's changed the party. Rename it the lion party?
Or really make them reee and call it the Gadsden party, lol. We need to get TOUGH
Because they were all enriching themselves under Obama, the most corrupt administration in history. We all have a common enemy, the swamp, and both parties rule there. The elites are probably in their mansions laughing at how divided they have us.
Don't think it's elected Officials that are in control. They're puppets. Look at who owns the Fed and profits obscenely from it's perverse relationship with our US Treasury. The same elite few also own the MSM and big pharma. I have no idea where Fauci rates on this scale but he's evil.
Matt Gaetz is good shit. 3 years ago gowdy was a T_D darling, but he's turned to shit. Nobody really ever liked McConnell. A couple Cocaine Mitch moments, but he's shit. Lindsey has always been songbird' McCains little bitch. He had a couple viral moments, but he's just a worthless RINO whenever push came to shove
YES!! The time for peaceful protest is long past, VA proved that. Time to start removing Governors from Office physically, all on the same day. 20,000 ar med patriots at every State Capitol all at the same time insures no one has to get hurt. See them stand trial for mass murder. (With exceptions for those few that aren't guilty) Citizen's arrest is legal if we're stopping a felony in progress. The only legitimacy any government ever had on this continent is the consent of the governed. We cannot consent to THIS! Due process allows us to charge them with their every act of tyranny, as well as file civil suits that have them die in prison as paupers. Send a clear message as to who the power is in the Country. It's always been We the People. It's absolutely essential to send that message loud and clear to any future would-be tyrants. Now we know it won't last 245 years, but it will last more than 20.
My attitude has long been: I support those Republicans who support President Trump. If they don't support my President, they are Democrats to me (which is like "You're dead to me" but more insulting.)
I've been saying for years that Gowdy was superb in his questioning and reasoning but that he always seemed to disappointment in some way. In a way that just didn't feel right. It's because he was a fucking mole. When he announcing that he wouldn't be running for re-election I knew he was no good. At the end of the day none of his decisions made sense. The only thing that made sense was that he was in on it. My only question is, was he a willing participant or was he forced into it.
Man, that video is brutal.
Fuck the DC Republicans.
We need the Lion Party.
Big PP
RINO= smol pp
DNC = lady pp
Front hole
Indeed.
Please don’t address everyone by their gender
Innie?
Lady with pp
Big Mike?
Smollest of PPs.
(Breathes in Darth Vader)
T Party
High-T Party
VERY high T party! That has the wrong optics though; they'd confuse us with Libertarians, lol. Stop the bs with ASR15s if necessary party also has the wrong optics, even if everybody's thinking it.
I just hope prosecutions are complete before 11/3, but I know they can't possibly be.
🐸
Big Pepe.
It’s not about being liked really other than acting like miss congeniality to garner votes.
It’s more like professional wrestling: both sides act like they hate each other and duke it out for show but at the end of the night they’re drinking together at the bar, slapping each other high fives at tricking the audience, with their paychecks in their pocket signed by the same boss.
Pretty much this.
Plus most of them on both sides have some skeletons in their closet, and they both know it, and that can be used as blackmail if either one steps out of line.
Jesus Christ that’s good
Term limits!
Don't forget those after work Parties at Epstein's for best scores on Beijing's good boy list
They never wanted to win. They just use different marketing techniques to make their way to the same feeding troughs the Democrats feed from.
Most people entering public service don't do it for this reason. They actually want to make things better. Then two things happen: they get disillusioned, and they're amazed at how much money can be made. Usually once they get a taste of the power that goes along with it, they're too far gone to do any good.
This is why the left assumes Trump's in it for all the wrong reasons. Next time I hear somebody spout off that schtick I'm likely to go ballistic
This actually happens and is far FAR more common than you might think:
You are running for a local office. Some mystery donor wants to meet, so you go out to lunch. He writes a check out for 50k, something that in a grassroots campaign might make a lot of difference. He fills out the whole check except for the name.
The he says, "You are going to decide who this check goes to. Do you want it, or should I give it to the other guy?"
This is usually how it works, and it happens when you ENTER low level politics. So by the time youve worked your way up to higher positions, those people were already compromised long ago. And then it just gets worse from there.
its done on purpose to create a sense of demoralization. When someone bright eyed and feels they can 'make a difference' enters the maintenance room of thee machine only to find out how lazy everyone else is. How corrupt everyone else is and how sloppy they all are. They get the sense of dread that not even one person can make a difference. This is the FDR legacy, this is the Democrat legacy in full view.
You make government workers part timers and you'll see how fast our freedoms get restored to us. Mainly because there's no money and graft to be made in being a mid-level bureaucrat.
This check is given to the Official; why is bribery not illegal?
And if you take the check but keep your integrity, you're basically saying Soros doesn't contribute to your campaign in the next election. This should have 0 consequence.
I agree with your first part but disagree about what the left assumes about Trump. They just don’t want their dirty laundry Aires and know GEOTUS will do it. That’s my belief.
I wish that's all it was. I've heard WAY too many democrats express this very thing. Not even leftists; old people that maybe haven't voted D all their life but somehow wound up there.
There may be lots of people as you describe, I don't know. I don't see why they'd be defensive about dirty laundry being aired though; it's not their own. I mean if half the "dirty laundry" DJT's been accused of had even a morsel of truth, I'd be PISSED and want to know all about it.
Nah - I’m not talking about the retarded sheep followers. I’m talking about everyone in the media, Hollywood and in political office. They either have been raping children or taking bribes and know the party is about to end with a tremendous hangover if DJT gets 4 more years. The rest are just idiots.
Idiots that vote ...
What's so weird is that /r/politics claims it's the exact opposite -- the GOP always sticks together, doubles down, never backs down, and Democrats don't fight hard enough.
Same screen, two films!
Whoa, the guy makes a good point (thank you Scott) don't discount him because you don't seen it.
He's right about r/politics, those turds do in fact claim it's GOP voters and their gov't reps that fight harder and stick together and whatnot. We can't dispute that, it's true, that's what they believe, and they are not quiet nor shy about their belief.
I'll give you a prime example; a thing that happened that frankly we consider a win but was really self-inflicted damage from Democrats, and how disappointed democrat voters and liberal faggots were that their guys couldn't fight, couldn't stick together.
Exhibit A: The Green New Deal. They democrat voters love this hair-brained scheme to bankrupt their country and themselves: a half-baked five-page double-spaced size 14 font essay cooked up from something Alex Cortez misunderstood about the reality of the world and it's climate. It's D+ work at best, but they [Dem voters, r/politics users] love the Green New Deal because they buy into this climate change malarkey whole-heartedly. But Nancy hates it, DiFI hates it, Schumer hates it, and no one with a brain likes it either. Remember what happened when those conniving GOPers brought the Green New Deal to a vote? The Democrats in the house didn't want to call a vote on it, and when they had to vote, they all voted "present" instead of "yea". Green New Deal went down in flames like the laughing stock it is. BUT... that's a major letdown for the Democrat voters and le redditeurs on r/politics. Accusations abound that their own team can't all play together *and for the *planet ** no less!
There's lots of much smaller stuff too: Schiff and Nadler bungled impeachment, Nancy and Schumer couldn't negotiate DACA, Ginsburg should have left office when the gay muslim was in the White House, DiFi told those cute school children who came to her office to beg her to do something about Climate Change and endorse the GND and she told them to grow up because they're just stupid children and they're not in charge of anything...
They have their own theater where they watch their own politics film, and in that film they see that their own party is disjointed and non-functional and their villain is the GOP and by extension us, and in their film we're a very competent villain.
Food for thought.
I agree. It's just another thing leftists are blind to.
@mishaclara, I actually think we are seeing the end of the Republican party and the Democratic party as we know it. I really do. What do you think the new party will be?
"Oh we can't oppose Obama because we'll be crucified in the media" they used to say.
The media was their cover for supporting all the Lefist/globalist selling out of America that their handlers hired them to do.
Trump takes the media weapon and beats them over the head with it.
Yep. Take a look at the FISA reauthorization bill that just passed. No major reform to address any of the historic abuses, and the only two Republicans to vote against it were Richard Burr (who we all know is utterly corrupt) and Rand Paul. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00092
Wait. that link goes to a reauthorization of a bill that started in 1978. Is that what you meant to link to?
Yes. HR 6172 is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reauthorization bill.
We need some kind of realignment, somewhere. I've never seen a party that represents what I believe. I believe in wisely regulated freedom, liberty and Capitalism. The Libertarians are close, but their stupidity regarding regulation and government is a non-starter. They're way too close to the Anarchism party.
Basically, what I want is the anti-Authoritarian party. Maximize Liberty and Freedom while recognizing that government has a role in smoothing out the rough parts and preserving things for future generations. There are parts of the Republicans that are way too Authoritarian, and unfortunately there are a lot of people here who are okay with it, because it happens to align with their own personal beliefs. Government should be protecting liberty and freedom FROM people's personal beliefs. It's that part of the Republicans that drive many people away and turn them into "Never-Republicans". It's not that they like all the Democrat corruption, it's that the Republicans give them no other possible home.
And I hate the term "Conservative". I'm not conservative in the sense that I want to never improve anything. I want to fix problems and evolve toward a better and better civilization. I'm a liberal in the classic definition of "maximize Liberty". We need way better labels.
"Conservative" in no way means "never improve anything." This false impression is what makes people think progressivism is the answer.
I don't think the Libertarian party stands for anything, at all. Talk to 10 libertarians, get 12 opinions. The concept should be limited government. Our founding Fathers were wise enough to know that government is evil, but it's a necessary evil. The Constitution exists largely to hem the federal government in; anything it isn't specifically empowered to do in the Constitution, it is forbidden from having the power to do. Except We the People haven't kept them honest with this.
We need to fix this. That may require refreshing a certain tree ... but right now I see it's the States (Governors) that are the biggest offenders. What a switch!
Underrated comment. You must listen to Mark Levin, like me.
I’ve listened to him on my drive home a few times. I like what I have heard from him so far.
I don't even know who that is. Let's spread the ideas though! It's a good time for some of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1mlCPMYtPk
Exactly why it's such a crappy term and why I hate it so much. It's like calling ourselves "Never Changists" and then telling everyone it doesn't really mean that. Words have meanings.
Libertarians also believe we should sell off the National Parks (right in their platform).
I once had a debate with a Libertarian that private nukes should be allowed. I'm a strong believer in personal defense, but that's the idiocy of Libertarians. It's all applying simple rules to a complex world with no nuance, wisdom or common sense.
They also don't have any leg to stand on when it comes to foreign policy. I'm an isolationist in the sense that we shouldn't be invading countries for their resources, but I'm also smart enough to know there are countries out there that would want to topple America because we set the bar on individual freedom and will always be an example to the rest of the world. I also understand that smaller countries who want to hold that bar as high want our protection. I'm glad Trump is calling out the reason why we were the police of the world: because no one else wanted to donate resources into the effort. While past presidents have used that as a means to conduct anything they want, trump is reeling it in, and has shown peace through power.
For the record, the actual philosophy of libertarianism doesn't support open borders. Libertarianism has a foundation in property rights, aka a fucking border. The left has co-opted libertarianism and turned then into "left libertarians" who are SJW-lites. Completely illogical.
Or, you could stop acting brainwashed by your biases and actually, you know, READ WHAT I WROTE.
I know what it means and what it represents. But the word itself sucks and drives people away. Why do I want to drive people away from the ideas of Liberty and Freedom? I don't, which is why I don't use words that drive people away. Not that all of conservative philosophy actually believes in Liberty and Freedom, but they're closer than a lot of other political stripes.
Bottom line, it doesn't matter what conservatives think conservative means. I'm trying to convince new people, particularly new generations.
You're picking a weird battle. He's talking about the marketing aspect of conservatism and offering his opinion on it. You're just being rude for no reason. You can disagree but his opinion on the marketing of conservatism doesn't reflect his political leanings.
The word only drives people away because the left has poisoned people against it. Seriously go look at the dictionary definitions of the word conservative and all of its derivations. It's a very accurate way to portray the party as a whole.
If you really want to be so fussy about it then call yourself a constitutionalist.
Conservative in no way means "never changing anything." It means you're predisposed to conserve things and to limit change, and that you take a cautious approach to all things.
Conservativism is how this country should be run. A bill shouldn't be rammed through Congress on the grounds of an emergency that increases incentives for healthcare companies to lie and extort money from the government. A gun ban shouldn't be instituted just because of a mass shooting somewhere. Everything should be taken with an abundance of caution when it comes to passing new laws and legislations because you can't always tell how freedoms will be destroyed and what loopholes will be created if you proceed too quickly with such wide ranging policy decisions.
Conservative in no way means "never changing anything." It means you're predisposed to conserve things and to limit change, and that you take a cautious approach to all things.
Conservativism is how this country should be run. A bill shouldn't be rammed through Congress on the grounds of an emergency that increases incentives for healthcare companies to lie and extort money from the government. A gun ban shouldn't be instituted just because of a mass shooting somewhere. Everything should be taken with an abundance of caution when it comes to passing new laws and legislations because you can't always tell how freedoms will be destroyed and what loopholes will be created if you proceed too quickly with such wide ranging policy decisions.
I say just go for a "Constitutionalist" party. Perhaps something to do with Logos or Truth, since Truth (of the Divine sort) is such a powerful concept in our founding
-Extreme government reductions in Welfare/education/etc. Yes even for vets. (The less we spend the less we tax, the lower price of living is, easier to find work and a house for disenfranchised. Charity rises with these numbers) -Extreme tax reductions, and the abolition of Income Tax -Obliteration of federal banks and fiat currency. -Setting a definite limit of rules allowed on books (to prevent bureaucracy) -Setting a word/page limit to legislature to prevent Pork that gets read by noone passing in congress. -Honoring patents and copyrights for ALL. -Ending of ALL Limits on the second amendment currently in the books.
The Constitutionalist party exists. Great ideas; they've never done anything. Your second sentence deserves discussion, since people exist that don't realize this isn't any violation of the principle of separation of Church and State. The FFRF (Freedom From Religion Foundation) is exactly such a bunch of idiots, and their HQ is about 50 miles from here.
People need to realize that when Cryin' Chuck etc talk about using this plannedemic to "advance their agenda," FFRF is included. Plus a million other evil things.
I took one of those "what party should you vote for quizzes" and it turns out I agreed 96% with the constitution party. Too bad the constitution party is about as obscure as the communist party of the USA.
I just took a look at the Constitution party. A lot of it is good, but there's really tragic irony in calling themselves the "Constitution" party when the Constitution intentionally makes no references to God or a specific religion. The first part of the Constitution party platform is, "...gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States."
Way to miss the point of religious freedom, Constitution Party. Christianity is great, but I do not want the government giving me a particular interpretation of religion. Religion is a strictly private matter between an individual and their God, and the government has no place in telling me what or how to believe.
There's a reason the founding fathers did it the way they did, and too many people don't understand the importance of it.
Imagine agreeing with everything else but drawing a line on God.
Public schools really battered into our heads the dangers of Christianity in politics.
Oh well. At least the gays can marry. Sorry we put trannies in public libraries and called you a bigot if you disagreed with it. Sorry that same tranny molested a kid. If that kid is molested, there's a good chance he too can become a mythical tranny if he chops off his dick and pumps himself full of hormones.
And isn't it great the demographics of all European countries will be transformed in about 30 years? Lol Haha its kinda funny really, white genocide (xd).
At least marijuana is legal. It's pretty cool to get high and think deeply about nothing at all. All your favorite rappers and movie stars do it. Seth Rogan, dude brah! Joe Rogan, dude brah! Lil Yachty! And soon your favorite sportsballers(who all hate America and whites) will be doing it. Don't you wanna be cool bruh?
And sex, man sex is great. Premarital extramarital anything except just boring o' marital! Gay sex, group sex. Gotta protect the NAPs, too - Non Aggressive Pedophiles. Lord knows society is too harsh on them.
At least we didn't put God in the constitution!
This is fine
God is fine -- just not in government. Let me be clear: You're welcome to your interpretation of religion, but I do NOT want your interpretation forced on me or my children.
Assuming you're not a Catholic, imagine if the Catholics were dominant in American government, and they decided that we needed the Pope to be taught as divinely inspired in public schools as part of school prayer. That's an extreme example, but it illustrates why I don't want ANYONE'S interpretation of religion anywhere near me or my children. You seem to think that Christians are somehow immune from being corrupt, but history teaches a very different lesson, lots and lots of times.
Yes, thank God. If you need your religion pushed on everyone with the force of government, then the problem is with how you're preaching to people, not with the government. If you can't teach your children religion at home, then your problem is with your home, not with the schools. Take care of your own business and leave me and my children alone. We're fine, thanks. I don't need or want your interpretation of religion.
That's all wonderful and you're welcome to your opinion. As long as you keep your opinion to yourself and never, ever, try and put that opinion into law, or force it on me or my children in any way, then we're good. Parts of it I agree with, and parts of it I believe you're dead wrong about. And that's why the founding fathers wrote the constitution the way they did, and why religious freedom is Amendment #1.
Keep religion in church and families, keep administration in government, and nobody needs to have any problems.
Terrible -- exactly because they mix religion into government.
Actually, and this is really cool, the Truths that are self-evident are capitalized as to inform that the Truths are universal. They are universal despite the religion you follow. It's why in the D.o.I. "Truths" is capitalized. It's about LOGOS or the Word. This is YUUUUGE.
Technically, the land itself Bestows those rights. Be it the Universe or whatever. Christian God plays only a personal part in it for individuals of Christian nature. Others would view this as a Deist concept.
The fact that youve never seen a party that represents what you believe, and neither has anyone else, is by design. We are all a lot alike, and we all have similar ideas about what government should look like, but our natural platform is split in half ---> republicans get one half of it, dems get the other, and then both halves of that platform are twisted, warped, and filled with poison.
They want us all to be acclimated to the dissatisfaction we feel with BOTH parties, so that you never get a taste of what real representation is like.
Also it's pretty much impossible to find even another single person who agrees with everything that you do. Political parties are a give and take. This is why I get frustrated on here when people say you shouldn't vote for this Republican or that Republican because they dont agree with Trump on these two topics.
I'll always vote for someone who will vote with Trump 70% of the time compared to someone who will vote with Trump 0% of the time. Purity control in parties is an absolute poison and is what causes the two halves of our system to constantly be at war. When you're not allowed to be an anti-gun Republican or an anti-abortion Democrat it just leads to gatekeeping and makes a lot of people become disinterested in government in the first place. Which is dangerous because that's when government will take the chance to grab more power, when the people aren't paying attention.
good point, pede. very insightful, i think youre absolutely right.
Well said. I love this.
Trump was more libertarian than the Libertarian Party's anti-gun "candidate" in 2016.
After Sept 11th 2001 America was never the same but not for the reasons you may think.
Give us the reasons?
The NSA and spy powers that arose from 9/11 allowed more ability for the powers that be to leverage the politicians into compliant mailable traitorous cunts.
Hmmm ... when you say TPTB I take that to mean the swamp; i.e. those that own the Fed and control our currency, and profit obscenely from it. They're known for not caring who makes our laws as long as they can control our currency.
So I'm thinking you're not referring to them? Our IC (intelligence community) probably works for them far more than they do anything in the interest of the US, so these are the folks you refer to with leverage? That seems to pertain to Gowdy, but I can't say I know how this leverage works. Or maybe Trey just stayed more loyal to the FBI than the US?
But yes the grossly misnamed "patriot act" sure gave our IC lots more power. I guess I never thought about that power being used over or against Congress.
CoughScaliacoughAndrew
Yuuuuuuuup
"Patriot" Act.
I would think that would be the first thing we'd all think of.
I feel we would have been where we are now with Dems/rino much sooner had 9/11 never happened. It basically forced them to love America and support it for a little.
Yes, the horrible spying/surveillance state also came out of it.
Well put
"Now?" This has been the case for 60 years, at least. If the CIA ever had a reason to exist, that ended with the USSR.
What did you mean by a "two front war?" Are you simply referring to both major parties? Because the swamp is MUCH bigger than that.
Ok, thanks. And I agree. And I only wish I could say our only domestic enemies were the obvious ones like Omar. Or even AOC.
The goal is to destroy the US, permanently. They hate us! And they are NOT stuck here with us; they can leave anytime.
And he's from Chicago. How appropriate lol
I think some couple that spied for the USSR got executed in the late '50s or early '60s
Rosenbergs i think...
it was WW2. There are multiple instances of us and Britain executing spies and traitors after ww2. In Britain, they executed a radio show host who was pro-nazi and used to broadcast a propaganda show in English for Englanders.
CNN, lookin at you.
"Look here Florence Nightingale, you tended to the wounds of this traitor so we hang you high too!"
I hope there was more to it than just that.
Hard times make tough men.
Execute a spy or traitor? You must be dreaming. We don’t do that anymore. We hand them book deals now and a spot on the CNN panels. Deserters? Even better? We send out real soldiers to go get him back at the risk of their own lives.
supposedly mccain was put to death
That's what many said. It sure wouldn't have taken much at that point. I never bought into that story; he wasn't on the side that gets whacked.
Yup, the enemy within is far more dangerous than external forces. That is what is so scary, our chunk of the population is going up against the entire world AND our own countrymen
And just like that Republicans learned the swamp is much bigger than they thought.
Great video, love Dan... A true American Patriot.
Oh I've known how big the swamp is since 1990 and I've been trying to raise people's awareness of it all this time. Not familiar with Bongino in the least and I usually avoid Tucker. He's spot on here though! He also seems to be getting better.
one reason to catch a bongino sometimes is that he is known to have some of the highest level reliable inside sources in news. Even senators and congressmen will occasionally comment about it like Nunez saying sometimes he'll be watching the Bongino and think 'Wow! Who in the HECK are your sources!? Not many people could have known that!'
Dude was secret services for 12 years...he knows the shit going on behind the scenes.
Why avoid Tucker? Every news program has its bias. Tucker at least seems to care. And I have yet to see him blatantly lie the way CNN and MSNBC do on the regular. I'm actually curious.
Most of the time I've seen Tucker he just seemed dumb, or dumbed down, maybe deliberately to appeal to the masses more? Overly simple, even when he did make a good point.
Lately he's come out with some great truth though. Of course there's been so MUCH of it! I'll agree he's always seemed to care, and to be honest and sincere. I like that. I hope he can undo all the influence peddling Jon Stewart did, but there seems to be no aisle crossing anymore I dunno ...
His opening monologue is all you need to catch. He has been on fucking point every time i tuned in more so these last six months
I know what you mean though and some of his guests are retards he brings on to spar with. I’m telling you just give him a shot, just watch his opening monologue
Why? Tucker is about as based as it gets on MSM. He's a great asset and an all around truth seeker.
"On MSM." Which I usually avoid. Although I must admit Tucker's been spitting fire lately!
One word; Uniparty.
Lmao at the "Lindsey 2.0" and "Cocaine Mitch" fools. It's called the UNIPARTY for a reason. DC is one Big Club - and we ain't in it.
One party, and we're not invited.
George Carlin reference, I like it
Lol ok now fess up - have long have you waited to pounce on a good occasion to use this username?
We have the best people!
How is "cocaine Mitch" a positive label?
He knows there's no coming back from this point, you know they're trying to get him "6 ways from Sunday"
Indeed. He’s well that after crossing that line, there is now turning back.
I commend his bravery, seriously takes balls and grit to face the threats he most certainly is facing.
He should just go on his own as a subscription service. I'd pay for that.
Tucker has come a long, long way since getting obliterated by Jon Stewart years back. He has redeemed himself and then some
Tucker was never "obliterated" by Jon Leibowitz dipshit
Jon's hypocrisy was so thick in that one. Acting all sanctimonious and preachy on crossfire. Then turned around and did worse than what he alleged crossfire was doing.
Anybody got a link to this? I missed it completely. Now it seems like an important moment in history ...
I'm old enough to remember when Jon Stewart was funny. Even though his viewpoints were of questionable ethics, even then
Just youtube ‘stewart carlson crossfire’
Back in my daily show days as a naive high schooler I thought Stewart wiped the floor with the “bow tie tucker” but my how times have changed 😂
I rewatched the video around 2016 election and man was I in liberal la la land. Tucker was still an inexperienced young buck at the time. I’d LOVE to see them get together and talk again during these times. I still think Tucker is just a cog in the system but damnit he’s MY cog!
He's been spitting fire lately!
Every time you hit Stewart with a good point, he just says oh but I'm just doing comedy. But he can come on your show and take a giant shit on it? Its a cop out, you don't get it both ways.
Its funny because I watched that when it originally aired and thought Jon came out the "winner" so to speak. But looking back at it with a more educated perspective, and without the spin, I was duped without realizing it.
Add a little more context: pre 911 game shows were the thing. Then 24 hour news cycle started after 911 and game shows were kaput. Pretty quickly they didn't have that many new developments to need a 24 hour news cycle, but that's still the loop most are stuck in.
But yeah in 2004 CNN was still viewed as credible by most. They started out as mostly showing legislative sessions, which is a legitimate way to help produce an informed electorate which is the only reason the press was given freedom in our Constitution to begin with.
Thanks for the link, I'm trying to take it in now. I found Stewart somewhat funny maybe late '99, before his opinions made him intolerable.
How do you win an argument with self-deprecation? That makes no sense.
Jon Stewart didn't win shit but the Pompous Asshole Award.
Why would they hide their real name? Isn't that weird? Like Hussein Obama being called Barry Soweto?
The funny thing about Jon Stewart;s Crossfire 'beatdown' is that at the time Jon Stewart was incredibly more influential on the Daily Show than Tucker was on Crossfire. Stewart was more than willing to go on Tucker's show and berate him for failing to give a fair and honest representation of what people really care about, while also actively dismissing his own responsibility to a larger audience. "I come on after Crank Yankers" he said, as if the subliminal, incorrect messaging coming from the Daily Show wasn't just as caustic to society, if not moreso, than the mockery of 'important debate' Crossfire was.
Anyone who watched the Daily Show during the writer's strike, where they attempted to try and still run the show without the writers behind the scenes doing the job, and you'll realize how much of a puppet all of those shows are. It's just a script and they're just actors. Compare that to the way that Tucker Carlson's show is now. I don't think Stewart obliterated Carlson then, or changed his mind. At best perhaps he pointed out, hypocritically, that the country is always in desperate need of honest news. I don't think that was news to Tucker at the time, however.
If you know history or politics, stewart’s show was cringe and downright damaging to a generation.
it was dangerous and crappy because a bunch of liberals watched it daily and forgot that in order to be well informed, you have to actually read the news. They thought John was all they needed.
John himself ran his show in the style of SNL vintage Dennis Miller, where you can tell from the outset that he is comedy. At least in his first half of his daily show stint, he is NOT in any way trying to pass himself off as news.
But the way the show was packaged, the way viewers tended to watch it... took him more seriously than he took himself. And then he started to believe that garbage, and became a more circumspect host, everything started to slide away from comedy and toward this kind of propaganda news crap.
Why would anybody let Jon Stewart influence them? If you're going to have your generation be influenced, at least let it be by The Who or Jimi Hendrix or Led Zeppelin or even Ozzy Osborne. Hey, War Pigs is every bit as relevant now as the day it was written. His dark stuff is mainly warnings to not be evil. Ironic.
Jon Stewart was orders of magnitude better than both Stephen Colbert and Trevor Noah, and is a huge supporter of 9/11 families. He had a liberal bias but it was a different sort of bias at the time.
Fixed that for you
Most people on TD arent there yet but yes. What you're saying also applies to pretty much all of the folk you see on TV telling people what to think.
Can you expand on this?
He's saying it is all the Jooz, trouble is I used to watch the Daily Show back then and Stewart was often very anti-Israel.
You can research mossad mockingbird media and the american zionism movement.
That should elaborate it if you're truly curious
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jon-stewart-so-funny-so-wrong-on-israel-gaza/
The deleted comment contained this link. You need to read it. And it's VERY typical Jon Stewart, not some one off.
Mockingbird is completely in sync with how the Fed bought and controlled the MSM, and has nothing to do with "zionism" which merely means the existence of Israel as a Nation.
Don't spread nazism here. Brain dead Storm Trooper bs just has no place. Get some facts right and all that crap washes down the drain where it belongs.
You're expressing nazi sentiment. It is false. Not everyone who owns the Fed is Jewish. They may be over represented there and in the rest of the problematic institutions, but it's not exclusively Jewish, it's not because of Judaism, neither are all Jews the problem.
Please see the link below that specifically debunks the woefully wrong claim about this individual
Who owns the Fed?
Lots of people! Some are arabs - not exactly Jewish. Some are Chinese, which doesn't mean that the whole problem is China like many here concluded. Also note that the Fed has many different branches. It's the NY branch that's most important because it controls the most money. It's an interesting exercise to see which private individuals own this for profit corporation, and also to see what else they own.
Don’t turn the MAGA movement into some leftist BS antisemitism. Don’t be a mouth-breather who generalizes like that. Just don’t. It’s gross.
Yes all criticism of the tribe is anti-Semitism and generalizations quit noticing things goy!
No, generalizations are not okay. If you have a legitimate gripe about someone, or about Israeli policy or something legitimate fine. But you’re clearly an antisemite. Do better.
Thanks for proving my point
A: “[Responds with anything that isn’t blind fealty].”
B: “Hurr durr, thanks for proving my point.”
You want people to agree with your generalizations. You’re just a pathetic clown who’s no better than any commie pinko leftist.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jon-stewart-so-funny-so-wrong-on-israel-gaza/
What is controlled opposition for $500 Alex?
Nope. Stewart's a leftist. Or smarter than that, but still responds like a puppet. "Mossad" is not what's been controlling the Fed since 1913. Neither is China. Neither are Jews. Neither is Judaism. Neither is everyone who's Jewish.
Arabs own it. Chinese own it. And yes, Jews are over-represented there and in all the related groups. It's about money and power, not religion.
Fair point, he was a bit hypocritical berating Tucker for spreading division when he was shirking responsibility for essentially doing the same
Sounds like shampeachment
Stewart hid behind his comedian title while giving fake news to tens of millions of millennials.
Is that how millennials got so fucked up? Lol I thought it was far more complex. No really no generation is a monolithic block. It'd be nice if our society could return to recognizing individuals.
At the 12:30 mark, when Tucker hits him saying "think your better on your show"
Jon lets the "laid back, just a comedian here to take you to task" mask slip to reveal a real angry guy in there
You can hear him try to yell over Tucker "You know what's interesting though, your as big a Dick on your show"
Jon's got an ego the size of Trump Tower
His famous "Just stop, you're hurting America" monologue when he went on Crossfire
Going on someone's show and intentionally being a cunt to them isn't obliterating them, it's just being a cunt.
It was one of those deals like the Ukranian phone call with Donald Trump. They all just decided that no matter what really happened, they were going to tell everyone that Jon Stewart demolished Tucker. It's no different than Schiff going up there and reading his own version of the call. Total bullshit hit job.
Kind of like when Slavoj "destroyed" Jordan peterson.
Peterson said he doesnt know a lot about communism, but you can start with points of fallacy in the Communist Manifesto.
Then Slavoj, after having just heard Peterson say that he is not well versed in communism, but has studied the CManifest, proceeds to force Peterson to return over and over again to subjects he is not versed as well in, and discounting the CManifesto as irrelavant to todays marxism.
That was a complete mexican hat dance around what would have been a debate if Slavoj knew how to debate.
And then is it really fair if one of them is high on amphetamines and the other one is doped up on sedatives???
Oh, but Peterson was "demolished".
And there's no cure for being a cunt
Sounds like something The Hound would say
Where is that faggot Stewart now
Apparently he just finished a film out soon.
Yechhh gag me with a spoon. Typical Hollywood libshit propoganda
Remember the time when movies went out of their way to display politicians as blank slates, without the slightest inference of what party they were representing?
Well, I mean, at least they used to be subtle about it.
And Jordan Peele has another anti white movie coming out, yay
"undocumented workers" have NO rights other than the right to gtfo and be correctly identified as ILLEGAL ALIENS. They certainly have nothing to do with "winning back America's heartland."
LEGAL workers? Fine.
There's nothing "hilarious" about "fighting for the soul of America." Maybe movie theaters should just stay closed if this is the crap they're going to poison society with.
I'll live in WI the rest of my life. I don't mean to be oversensitive but FUCK THAT. You know the phrase "some things are worth dying for?" Yeah no. War is not dying for your Country, it's the art of making the other SOB die for wanting to fuck up your Country. This is far too real to be in any way humorous. And VA proved that the time for peaceful protest is over.
I'm having a hard time imagining anything more hypocritical or more blatantly projection.
Is it bad if I hate him now? Like want to bash his face in hate?
I feel like how you walk away from that interview is a window into where a person is in their understanding of the political landscape. Those who see Stewart obliterating Carlson (and I was one of those people at the time) haven't yet understood the wide reach of propaganda going on in America. Once you understand how the leftists are programming everybody, Stewart comes across as a blatant hypocrite who got caught and is desparetly trying to backpedal.
It was mostly body language. They were expecting a goofball and he came in crying and pointing fingers. A LOT of people got all of their news from the daily show rag and he said “its comedy central bro.” I wasnt aware of who was who then but it was flawed logic and hypocrisy even to a younger apolitical me
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DTXIoJn0KTsV
Link to the video. Obliterate may not be the right word, but I do agree Tucker has come along way.
Look at Jake Tappers physical decline. Looks like a before and after on a faces of meth video. Coincidence?
I believe Tapper is basically a decent person. Being paid to lie on a daily basis is bad for you, especially if you know deep down what you are doing is wrong.
Notice how he occasionally reports something that is true, as if to show himself that he's still a good guy
Yeah, well being half a coward is tough. He's dying 500 times a day.
Same thing is happening to Bill Maher to a lesser extent, even he is not left enough for his audience these days
What do Bill Maher and Jon Leibowitz have in common 🤔🤔🤔
Now do Mark Levin, Kushner, and Shapiro.
While they may have outsized influence in the media, not all jewish people are liberals just as not all jewish people support Israel
Yeah it's almost as if they have a little clique of connected people who try to control both sides of the political discourse in our nation
Levin and Shapiro both hated Trump and did everything they did to stop his election until he won, then when they realized how wrong they were and how little voters valued their opinions they tried to jump on the band wagon
https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/275722-mark-levin-i-would-never-vote-for-trump
https://www.dailywire.com/news/shapiro-i-will-never-vote-donald-trump-heres-why-ben-shapiro
Now people are allowed to change their minds and admit they were wrong. And I'm allowed to say that Shapiro and Levin are hacks and I don't value their opinions or dubious insights.
Influential Jews are completely ok with complaining about "white privilege." In fact they're the ones funding progressive politicians. 7/8 of the largest Democratic donors are ethnic Jews (Eyechaner is the only one who doesn't have a Jewish parent)
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/most-influential-democratic-donors-2020-elections.html
And if your counter to someone finding it remarkable that the Democratic Party is almost completely funded by wealthy Jews (who are only 2-4 percent of the population) is to point out that the Republican Party is also funded by wealthy Jews, isn't that even more remarkable?
https://www.axios.com/2018-midterm-elections-sheldon-adelson-donations-1cda86b7-e4bf-4d12-bb38-27feec9ec28c.html
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-adelson-reportedly-watches-election-with-trump-1.6632299
Is it not reasonable to ask if American politicians are selling out to Jewish donors and giving them an Israel First foreign policy?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/08/sheldon-adelson-trump-middle-east-policy
https://www.haaretz.com/1.4764706
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinon_Plan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean_Break:_A_New_Strategy_for_Securing_the_Realm
Absolutely. I just find it counterproductive when people go Zoggin within doing their homework and bringing the receipts to back themselves and their positions up. But you have definitely done that here, so I will close by saying that I overall agree with you and suggest a couple policy changes:
No dual citizenship in congress
No foreign aid to Israel (or nearly anyone else)
Relegalization of BDS and natl divestment from West Bank
Lobbying groups for other countries are outlawed
Relegalization of criticism of Israel and questioning of history
Sounds good to me
BDS has one goal: cause Israel to cease existing. Not ok.
"Natl divestment from west bank." US, or Israel?
I agree with the rest, but "questioning of history" in this context usually means holocaust denial. Just no. If you want to compare how other ethnicities were killed on a larger scale than Jews? Ok. Nazism was largely about genocide and racial supremacy. Jews were singled out as the worst, but lots more Soviets were killed. Civilians in Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad may not be counted as accurately, (or maybe are counted more accurately?) but just in these 3 cities more Soviets were killed nazis than Jews were.
"Of the $675 million given by the top 50 donors, 66 percent of the money came from Jews and 34 percent from gentiles.
Of the $297 million that GOP candidates and conservative causes received from the top 50 donors, 56 percent was from Jewish individuals.
Of the $361 million Democratic politicians and liberal causes received, 76 percent came from Jewish givers."
http://archive.is/KvgBj
They're cunts who use racial, ethnic and religious stereotypes to belittle people they envy. Your spiritual brothers.
Yep, me, a TD commenter, I'm the same as an overwhelming amount of media owners and talking heads who are all of a certain persuasion. Totally spiritual brothers. Ad hominem, the tactic of fags without arguments.
Those who own the Fed also own the MSM. And big pharma. They are NOT all Jews! Arabs own it. Chinese. Many other ethnicities.
Get some facts here. You are WAY off base.
[citation needed]
Stewart flamed warmingering republicans, then shilled for obamma’s warmongering
Stewart is weasel
Maybe 2-5 Senators and 10-20 Representatives care about this country and common sense. The rest are the equivalent of a medieval court protecting their quasi oligarchy and king, the DS. Undoing this will take years of concerted effort at the local, state, and federal levels. We can't participate only in the presidential election and expect anything to change. A true MAGA (NOT republican/democrat) majority in Congress would solve almost every problem that matters. They are the swamp's mother and gatekeeper.
I know it’s popular here to spitball about, but we MUST FORM A NEW MAGA TYPE POLITICAL PARTY.
No more vote republican and hope they’re based, no more that guy that’s been in DC for a decade might still be one of us. Seriously, this shot is imperative.
How in the fuck do we start getting the mall rolling, besides funding??
The Lion Party
Take over the Repubs like Trump did.
Can't primary Repubs if we don't have MAGA candidates running against them.
Congress was duped when the swamp took over. That was in 1913 with the creation of the Fed (and the IRS)
We do not have time to exist as a Nation to change Congress that much and let them take the lead. They have fucked it up that much. Citizen's arrest is legal when we stop a felony in progress. About 40 Governors deny sick people medicine. It's criminal! 20,0000 at each State Capitol at the same time is more than enough to insure nobody needs to get hurt. I could do it with 300, but getting out might get a little dicey. We do this the rest of our enemies retreat to their shadows where they prefer to operate anyway. DJT says he "caught them all," that means he can help us rout them out of their hiding places. Class action lawsuits, both civil and criminal is how we gain long lasting victory, but we have to expect they take years to get through Court. We need results before November
Awesome. In many respects, it’s not about right or left, it’s about swamp or Patriot.
There’s prob more we all agree on really but these fucks divide us to get a better grasp on their power and do the will of the people when it’s in their best interest not ours. Fuck them all!
I would say we can simplify it further: good or evil. It really has come to that.
Hang them all and let God sort ‘em out.
I will provide the necessary rope.
Username checks out! I'm thinking I missed my life's calling as a hangman.
And dont forget Danny B. So Glad i found his podcast few years ago. He has been all over spygate for years.
Shout out to 279.
Gotalink? Too bad Trey Gowdy wasn't doing that in Congress
Our President is such a hero. I can't believe he's made it through this far with every single person in DC fighting against him tooth and nail. He drags them all kicking and screaming toward a better America. Thank you God for giving us such a wonderful person to lead us!
Not American but I firmly believe Trump is one of the greatest persons to ever walk this planet and certainly in my lifetime
He's unique, there is no one like him
Been following him closely since 2015 because I recognize true greatness when I see it
A rising tide lifts all boats. Our past Presidents used our country to export wickedness and prop up terrible people. It's not just us that suffer their tyranny and likewise, he may help your people, instead of hold you down.
Absolutely. If the U.S is weak, all kinds of bad things happen. Obama brought nothing but war and misery to the world (ISIS, Syria, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Crimea and Ukraine) and the great migrant wave bringing islamic terror to Europe
If U.S becomes weak again after Trump, the world will be looking at China dominating the 21st century, that can't happen
China has serious designs on dominating from space. I'll see if I can dig up a link to a vid that covers this. A guy that has read everything the Chinese government has put out on the subject for something like 22 years.
Good clip. So do we have people lined up ready to help MAGA and take out these Rinos, and are the citizens educated enough to know to actually vote for them?
It's good that we've highlighted the problem, but we need to know the solutions just as much, if not more.
Can we afford to try to oust incumbent Rs this November?
FUCK PAUL RYAN!
Not enough play on RYAN's name in this. But, hey, it's FOX News.
At least Ryan was a consistent Never Trumper. Not like the all-hat-no-cattle players constantly on the networks talking tough.
I hate RINOs more then liberals'.
Leftists haven;t had a shred of integrity until just recently. Liberals are not the same thing as leftists. Or at least they didn't used to be. Now they've all been drug so far left it's hard to tell, but hopefully the DNC shoves the AOC wing out of the party and relegates them to third party status. It was looking like that would happen for a while there, anyway.
We were in a one party system until Donald J. Trump, change my mind.
Parts of this make for a good long term ad campaign to rid the system of RINOs (imho). Those of us who are conservatives and Trump supporters need to start calling out the RINO GOP. Once again, Thus group is the reason I donate to POTUS direct website in lieu of the RNC.
lindsay graham is the most useless among them...
In some ways I disagree with this, actually. I am glad the Mueller investigation reached its natural conclusion, without interference. It revealed, unambiguously, that there was no Russian collusion, and nobody gives a shit about his wishy washy answer on obstruction when the crime being investigated never happened.
I think a lot of these congressional republicans made a calculation, they knew the President was innocent, and allowing the investigation to conclude on its own settled that question in the minds of every American who's not 100% dead set against Trump no matter what. If the investigation had been derailed or ended prematurely, MSMDNC could have endlessly spun it that Trump had something to hide and the American people never got a real answer. They tried anyway, but it didn't work.
Mueller probe's lead person is now openly campaigning for Biden. It's unreal, they don't even hide their corruption
Thanks for saying this. It might have been the better choice. My relatives are swing voters. After russiagate and ukrainegate, they said theyre never voting for another democrat again.
Well it seems to me that most people that aren't already Trump supporters completely skipped the memo that Mueller simply showed DJT's innocence, the shampeachment was worse than a waste because it deflected attention from CCPvirus, and Flynn is beyond innocent. (And by implication everyone else they went after in DJT's cabinet, too)
And yet RedPillMissionary says the exact opposite about people he knows a couple posts down; I hope there are a LOT of people in that category!!
I kinda do feel DJT acted like he wanted to stop Mueller, just so they would relentlessly pursue it. And used all that to expose the DS. This does have significant overlap with Q ...
There was nothing natural about the investigation and they wrote a bullshit report on it too. Half the American public thinks that the investigation declared Trump guilty.
Mirror?
MOAB !!!
Nobody's in jail. Still.
We need term limits, and a retirement vote of confidence at large. Losing the VOC: no retirement pay and permanent bar from ANY public office, including appointments.
No retirement pay OR BENEFITS
Finally someone said it outside of here!! Yay Tucker
and THIS is why we have Trump. The GOP is completely exposed for the profiteering criminal assholes they are. There's no going back now.
Can anyone imagine voting for another GOP president after Trump??
There's TONS of talent to take over in 2024. I don't think we can call it the GOP anymore though. DJT was never a Republican, and he's changed the party. Rename it the lion party?
Or really make them reee and call it the Gadsden party, lol. We need to get TOUGH
If I can vote a MAGA candidate I will. Unfortunately there aren't that many.
DRAIN THE SWAMP! ON BOTH SIDES!!
Tucker and Dan are both national treasures. More like them, please.
#WhoseSideAreTheyOn
Human scum
I would shank someone to have Tucker look at me in that ‘befuddled dog’ face.
i kinda want to see a cut of someone asking 'you want to go outside?' or 'you want a treat?' and then have tucker making the face.
why doesnt jeff tedrich reply to these damning videos on twatter? I'll wait.....
Need a new link to the video
https://streamable.com/2ik1nj Credit to pmurTJdlanoD
Because they were all enriching themselves under Obama, the most corrupt administration in history. We all have a common enemy, the swamp, and both parties rule there. The elites are probably in their mansions laughing at how divided they have us.
Don't think it's elected Officials that are in control. They're puppets. Look at who owns the Fed and profits obscenely from it's perverse relationship with our US Treasury. The same elite few also own the MSM and big pharma. I have no idea where Fauci rates on this scale but he's evil.
Wow just wow. The mask is off!
Tucker makes me so hard when he talks this way. UUUNnngh!
God I fucking hate politicians.
LION PARTY NOW
Don't care what anyone says, Tucker is Cable News Batman.
The GOP is why I wrote NONE OF THE ABOVE on my presidential election ballot in 2012 and why I voted third party in 2008.
They are a bunch of tyrannical, backstabbing hypocrites with no balls and no backbone and can be just as bad as the Democrats.
I don't consider myself a Republican. I am a Trumplican.
Cinematic brilliance
Solid mashup but what's with the 1:1 frame and comical level of zooming/panning?
It's great on substance but the editing makes it feel like it's supposed to be a funny meme.
I'll take that over funny memes with 0 substance any day. I mean, this is GREAT on substance!!
I remember three years ago when I got suspended from T_D for saying Gowdy and Sessions were do-nothing phonies that were ruining Trump's presidency.
We had to vote Rep to get the right person in, we dont trust them either and we let the bad ones know at every turn
Matt Gaetz is good shit. 3 years ago gowdy was a T_D darling, but he's turned to shit. Nobody really ever liked McConnell. A couple Cocaine Mitch moments, but he's shit. Lindsey has always been songbird' McCains little bitch. He had a couple viral moments, but he's just a worthless RINO whenever push came to shove
Here's an idea...
Arrest them all and start over
YES!! The time for peaceful protest is long past, VA proved that. Time to start removing Governors from Office physically, all on the same day. 20,000 ar med patriots at every State Capitol all at the same time insures no one has to get hurt. See them stand trial for mass murder. (With exceptions for those few that aren't guilty) Citizen's arrest is legal if we're stopping a felony in progress. The only legitimacy any government ever had on this continent is the consent of the governed. We cannot consent to THIS! Due process allows us to charge them with their every act of tyranny, as well as file civil suits that have them die in prison as paupers. Send a clear message as to who the power is in the Country. It's always been We the People. It's absolutely essential to send that message loud and clear to any future would-be tyrants. Now we know it won't last 245 years, but it will last more than 20.
"carry hot sauce in your purse" - Priceless!!
My attitude has long been: I support those Republicans who support President Trump. If they don't support my President, they are Democrats to me (which is like "You're dead to me" but more insulting.)
"Dead dog democrat?" Lol. We should make that a thing.
Fucking epic breakdown
Thank you. Inquiring minds want to know...
I’ll admit - gowdy duped me hard.
He is a fuckin snake who went on tv to talk tough then after the cameras he did the exact opposite. Fuck that guy and his little fruit-bag costumes.
I've been saying for years that Gowdy was superb in his questioning and reasoning but that he always seemed to disappointment in some way. In a way that just didn't feel right. It's because he was a fucking mole. When he announcing that he wouldn't be running for re-election I knew he was no good. At the end of the day none of his decisions made sense. The only thing that made sense was that he was in on it. My only question is, was he a willing participant or was he forced into it.