14
Comments (37)
sorted by:
2
FatDickNick 2 points ago +3 / -1

We like to keep things in tippy top shape.

1
Robert [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Now, I wonder if Cloudflare will go down again just as soon it hits rising? Hurry, get your memes in before it does! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Robert [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he replied to a tweet from May of 2019. Completely out of the blue, sporting a WWG1WGA hashtag.

If you want to take the blue pill, you absolutely can. But the choice is yours.

1
highenergywinning 1 point ago +2 / -1

THE BEST IS YET TO COME

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
-3
FooLyCooLie -3 points ago +0 / -3

I never called you a Qtard, nor did I use the term larp.

Yet you still won't answer my question about fair criticisms. You're just ruining your own credibility, as well as that of Q.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
Robert [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow that dude just straight up gangstalked your posts to find you when you weren't even talking to him. Holy fuck these chicoms are obsessive.

-1
FooLyCooLie -1 points ago +0 / -1

How am I 'obssesive' when he refused to respond? You get a notification every time you get a reply, which he willingly ignored. I know he did because he replied to a few different comments in the same post while I was waiting.

Yeah, I'm a 'ChiCom' because I don't believe the credibility of Q. Didn't Trump just tweet the exact opposite of what Q is saying? Lmfao.

-3
FooLyCooLie -3 points ago +0 / -3

You replied to the wrong comment, first of all. In your response to the wrong comment, you implied it's the same thing. Which isn't an answer to why Q seems to be wrong a majority of the time. Try again.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +0 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Robert [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you're witnessing here is an actual, legitimate attempt to slide a thread's discussion. This dude is a real deal shill with a playbook and all.

-2
FooLyCooLie -2 points ago +0 / -2

Still can't answer the question, I see. Never mind the fact that I've asked it three separate times now.

Gate-keeping

Cute projection.

spez: Also,

But to say that I've "replied to the wrong comment", merely shows that you think you're some conversational gatekeeper, which is egotistical and a little bit sad.

"You did reply to the wrong comment. I linked a comment to your originally, asking about the fair criticisms of Q. You replied to a comment of the linked comment with 'it's the same thing'. Which is an insufficient answer. Why do I have to keep explaining that to you?"

1
Robert [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

He wasn't replying to anyone. His was a top-level post. Learn 2 .win.

-2
FooLyCooLie -2 points ago +0 / -2

You were just commenting on how Q is full of it. Why are you defending Q now?

spez: He did reply to the wrong comment. He replied to a comment of the comment I linked originally.

spez: u/Robert Here is the comment I posted, with the link. Click it, and you'll see he didn't respond to the linked question. But to a comment of said linked question, with an insufficient response none the less.

0
COnDEMnED 0 points ago +2 / -2

The “hur dur trust sessions” Q bash post a bit down the page is in shambles.

2
Robert [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

With Trump being a big wrestling fan, I can't tell for sure whether it's all theatre or not. But I also can't deny that it absolutely benefits Trump to stay as far away from Sessions as possible considering Sessions was the one who initially started the FISA abuse investigation(Source) as soon as he recused from the Russia probe (he wasn't recused from his FISA investigation though likely would have had to later because they would claim it was a bogus investigation tainted with COIs) and hired the man who is currently running the FISA abuse investigation as a DC attorney. (Source

When Barr prosecutes, Trump can throw his hands up and say "Hey, I hated the guy, I didn't ask him to start any investigations, in fact, I couldn't get rid of him soon enough!"

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
4
COnDEMnED 4 points ago +4 / -0

Essentially, Q is alleged to be a team from NSA.
Q posts a topic and a general direction to start looking. Anons start digging in open source and find the intel pertinent to the topic. Has to be open source as to not break certain laws.

We’re told over the target, or keep digging. We sometimes get a confirmation and are told to watch upcoming news to see the real goings on, not just what the fake news is reporting.

The Anons are the ones actually doing the research, which is why so many people think “Q lied”. It’s not that Q lied, it’s that you’re hearing the interpretation of what someone else thinks Q was trying to say. Very rarely does Q make posts in absolutes. He has in the past about Schiff, basically calling him a treasonous asshole.

I hope this helps understand some of the basics.

1
FooLyCooLie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Interesting. Thanks for breaking it down.

u/Robert, and u/NimbleNavigator I owe you an apology. This response is what I was looking for, and it explains the other side of things.

2
Robert [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly I just find conspiracy-type stuff fun in general because I have a genuine distrust of authority, and I hope you can understand where that kind of mindset comes from for a lot of people, considering half the governors in the country are trying to keep people locked down and can't even keep their story straight on the efficacy of masks.

I'd buy you a beer if you were my neighbor, as is the American way.

1
FooLyCooLie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Of course I can. I'm the same way, and the existence of Echelon proved the suspicions of many conspiracy theorists right.

Here's to hoping the NSA is the final shot in the foot needed to take the Deep State down for good.

🥃

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
FooLyCooLie 0 points ago +1 / -1

No. I replied to it, and issued an apology to both of you there.

I get why you thought my behavior was suspect. It's hard not to go from 0-100mph when we're constantly being inundated with ChiComs, and leftist trolls. I was also beginning to suspect Q was an attempt by the left to divide us.

spez: Dammit, I didn't check the parent post. You got me.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
FooLyCooLie -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh, so any person that doesn't believe Q is suddenly a ChiCom?

Busted.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
FooLyCooLie 0 points ago +1 / -1

I owe you an apology. I got the answer I was looking for, and it explained things.

2
Robert [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Q is for people not interested in the dry and boring politics?

Well, it's probably a little bit of that. But what it really is, is a great aggregator of actual important news from journalists worth following, such as Sara Carter and John Solomon, as opposed to fake news, and even pointed out when they were being spied on before it hit the headlines that they were, in fact, being spied on.

It does get pretty spicy and even suggests that the Rothschilds (who Hillary can be seen sucking up to in her emails here) aren't standing at the top of the ladder. Direct Source, you'll have to scroll down

The basic idea is that it serves as a military backchannel to the people because MSM is fake news and Twitter and Youtube and other places tend to censor conservatives or call them white supremacist conspiracy theorists lol. 4chan was used to great effect in the 2016 election and it looks like they moved to 8ch because even 4chan has mods that spend half their day dilating.

I never needed anything Q to understand how team Trump unravels spygate.. There are 2-3 blogs and a few people on twitter, epoch times etc. that laid it out perfectly.

That said, if your sources are accurate, there's no reason not to stick with them.