Search for it on Duckduckgo, is what you meant. Clearly you're not a pede.
As for the rest of what you typed, you lost all credibility when you started advocating for wearing unneeded masks and agreeing with that leftist troll Booleh.
...because I'm not a lazy as fuck millennial
So I guess all other generations that used abbreviations in their line of work were lazy, too?
I'm well aware of duckduckgo and it is my default search engine, however when used as a verb 'google it' happens to have much more widespread understanding of meaning.
Or do you want to continue arguing semantics as of why you can't be bothered to be inconvenienced to wear a mask when in crowds? How about addressing some of the points made in my write up rather than herp derp HCP TIK TOK pedantics?
if masks work why six feet apart? If six feet apart works, why require masks. Besides, it's already known the masks don't work. Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.
I spoon fed you 2 links, first link a TLDR and second link for if you want to read further on the point i was making. The first link was on a first grade level of understanding, the second link was based on a study from the 'New England Journal of Medicine'. I can't help it if you are too ignorant to be bothered to read the literature presented before you.
Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.
nice job following the MSM WHO (chinese health organization) narrative, how stunningly intellectual of you
edit: Added WHO stuff. Might i remind you, GEOTUS pulled funding from the WHO precisely for the reasons you are arguing for
I spoon fed you 2 links, first link a TLDR and second link for if you want to read further on the point i was making. The first link was on a first grade level of understanding, the second link was based on a study from the 'New England Journal of Medicine'. I can't help it if you are too ignorant to be.
You never linked anything. You never answered the question, either.
nice job following the MSM WHO (chinese health organization) narrative, how stunningly intellectual of you
There's a difference between hearing it, and believing it. Nice straw-man argument.
Search for it on Duckduckgo, is what you meant. Clearly you're not a pede.
As for the rest of what you typed, you lost all credibility when you started advocating for wearing unneeded masks and agreeing with that leftist troll Booleh.
So I guess all other generations that used abbreviations in their line of work were lazy, too?
I'm well aware of duckduckgo and it is my default search engine, however when used as a verb 'google it' happens to have much more widespread understanding of meaning.
Or do you want to continue arguing semantics as of why you can't be bothered to be inconvenienced to wear a mask when in crowds? How about addressing some of the points made in my write up rather than herp derp HCP TIK TOK pedantics?
You could also say "look it up". "Google it" isn't the only term that exists when it comes to synonyms of "research it".
Tell me, if masks work why six feet apart? If six feet apart works, why require masks? Besides, it's already known the masks don't work.
Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.
spez:
Said the 'nurse', as well as the person drinking the misleadia Kool-Aid. Just stop.
I spoon fed you 2 links, first link a TLDR and second link for if you want to read further on the point i was making. The first link was on a first grade level of understanding, the second link was based on a study from the 'New England Journal of Medicine'. I can't help it if you are too ignorant to be bothered to read the literature presented before you.
nice job following the MSM WHO (chinese health organization) narrative, how stunningly intellectual of you
edit: Added WHO stuff. Might i remind you, GEOTUS pulled funding from the WHO precisely for the reasons you are arguing for
You never linked anything. You never answered the question, either.
There's a difference between hearing it, and believing it. Nice straw-man argument.