17
Comments (89)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-11
Sir_Tater [S] -11 points ago +2 / -13

I'm well aware of duckduckgo and it is my default search engine, however when used as a verb 'google it' happens to have much more widespread understanding of meaning.

Or do you want to continue arguing semantics as of why you can't be bothered to be inconvenienced to wear a mask when in crowds? How about addressing some of the points made in my write up rather than herp derp HCP TIK TOK pedantics?

8
FooLyCooLie 8 points ago +9 / -1

You could also say "look it up". "Google it" isn't the only term that exists when it comes to synonyms of "research it".

Tell me, if masks work why six feet apart? If six feet apart works, why require masks? Besides, it's already known the masks don't work.

Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.

spez:

...herp derp HCP TIK TOK pedantics.

Said the 'nurse', as well as the person drinking the misleadia Kool-Aid. Just stop.

-10
Sir_Tater [S] -10 points ago +1 / -11

if masks work why six feet apart? If six feet apart works, why require masks. Besides, it's already known the masks don't work. Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.

I spoon fed you 2 links, first link a TLDR and second link for if you want to read further on the point i was making. The first link was on a first grade level of understanding, the second link was based on a study from the 'New England Journal of Medicine'. I can't help it if you are too ignorant to be bothered to read the literature presented before you.

Or let me guess, you don't remember when the misleadia flip-flopped from "wear masks", to "they don't work", and back to "wear masks"? How convenient.

nice job following the MSM WHO (chinese health organization) narrative, how stunningly intellectual of you

edit: Added WHO stuff. Might i remind you, GEOTUS pulled funding from the WHO precisely for the reasons you are arguing for

0
FooLyCooLie 0 points ago +1 / -1

I spoon fed you 2 links, first link a TLDR and second link for if you want to read further on the point i was making. The first link was on a first grade level of understanding, the second link was based on a study from the 'New England Journal of Medicine'. I can't help it if you are too ignorant to be.

You never linked anything. You never answered the question, either.

nice job following the MSM WHO (chinese health organization) narrative, how stunningly intellectual of you

There's a difference between hearing it, and believing it. Nice straw-man argument.